IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2023i1p51-d1304754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Unit Commitment of Combined-Cycle Units with Real Operational Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro González-Sierra

    (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar, Cartagena 130010, Colombia)

  • Sonja Wogrin

    (Institute of Electricity Economics and Energy Innovation, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria
    Institute for Research in Technology (IIT), ICAI School of Engineering, Comillas Pontifical University, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This paper highlights the importance of accurately modeling the operational constraints of Combined-Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGTs) within a unit-commitment framework. In practice, in Colombia, when given an initial dispatch by the Independent System Operator, CCGT plants are operated according to the results of heuristic simulation codes. Such heuristics often omit technical operating constraints, including hot, warm, or cold startup ramps; the minimum operation hours required for a gas turbine to start a steam turbine; the relationship between the dispatched number of steam and gas turbines; the load distribution among gas turbines; and supplementary fires. Most unit-commitment models in the literature represent standard technical constraints like startup, shutdown, up/down ramps, and in some cases, supplementary fires. However, they typically overlook other real-life CCGT operating constraints, which were considered in this work. These constraints are crucial in integrated energy systems to avoid equipment damage, which can potentially put CCGT plants out of service and ultimately lead to lower operating costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro González-Sierra & Sonja Wogrin, 2023. "Self-Unit Commitment of Combined-Cycle Units with Real Operational Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:51-:d:1304754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Lei & Pan, Kai & Guan, Yongpei, 2019. "A strengthened mixed-integer linear programming formulation for combined-cycle units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 865-881.
    2. Mitra, Sumit & Sun, Lige & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2013. "Optimal scheduling of industrial combined heat and power plants under time-sensitive electricity prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 194-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leisen, Robin & Radek, Julian & Weber, Christoph, 2024. "Modeling combined-cycle power plants in a detailed electricity market model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Deetjen, Thomas A. & Vitter, J. Scott & Reimers, Andrew S. & Webber, Michael E., 2018. "Optimal dispatch and equipment sizing of a residential central utility plant for improving rooftop solar integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1044-1059.
    3. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2017. "Optimal design, operation and analytical criteria for determining optimal operating modes of a CCHP with fired HRSG, boiler, electric chiller and absorption chiller," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1052-1065.
    4. Rezaei, Navid & Pezhmani, Yasin & Khazali, Amirhossein, 2022. "Economic-environmental risk-averse optimal heat and power energy management of a grid-connected multi microgrid system considering demand response and bidding strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    5. Changsen Feng & Zhongliang Huang & Jun Lin & Licheng Wang & Youbing Zhang & Fushuan Wen, 2025. "Aggregation Model and Market Mechanism for Virtual Power Plant Participation in Inertia and Primary Frequency Response," Papers 2503.04854, arXiv.org.
    6. Wu, Chuanshen & Zhou, Yue & Gan, Wei & Wu, Jianzhong, 2025. "Robust scheduling of a pulp and paper mill considering flexibility provision from steam power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    7. Ferrari, Lorenzo & Esposito, Fabio & Becciani, Michele & Ferrara, Giovanni & Magnani, Sandro & Andreini, Mirko & Bellissima, Alessandro & Cantù, Matteo & Petretto, Giacomo & Pentolini, Massimo, 2017. "Development of an optimization algorithm for the energy management of an industrial Smart User," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1468-1486.
    8. Wu, Chenyu & Gu, Wei & Xu, Yinliang & Jiang, Ping & Lu, Shuai & Zhao, Bo, 2018. "Bi-level optimization model for integrated energy system considering the thermal comfort of heat customers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 607-616.
    9. Bischi, Aldo & Taccari, Leonardo & Martelli, Emanuele & Amaldi, Edoardo & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo & Campanari, Stefano & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "A detailed MILP optimization model for combined cooling, heat and power system operation planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 12-26.
    10. Ondeck, Abigail D. & Edgar, Thomas F. & Baldea, Michael, 2015. "Optimal operation of a residential district-level combined photovoltaic/natural gas power and cooling system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 593-606.
    11. Jun Yan & Yuqi Zhao & Qianpeng Hao & Yu Ji & Minhao Zhang & Huan Ma & Nan Meng, 2025. "Energy Scheduling Strategy for the Gas–Steam–Power System in Steel Enterprises Under the Influence of Time-Of-Use Tariff," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Iliev, I.K. & Terziev, A.K. & Beloev, H.I. & Nikolaev, I. & Georgiev, A.G., 2021. "Comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of different types co-generators at large scales CHPs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Heng Yang & Ziliang Jin & Jianhua Wang & Yong Zhao & Hejia Wang & Weihua Xiao, 2019. "Data-Driven Stochastic Scheduling for Energy Integrated Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Alipour, Manijeh & Zare, Kazem & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2014. "Short-term scheduling of combined heat and power generation units in the presence of demand response programs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 289-301.
    15. Kia, Mohsen & Setayesh Nazar, Mehrdad & Sepasian, Mohammad Sadegh & Heidari, Alireza & Sharaf, Adel M., 2017. "Coordination of heat and power scheduling in micro-grid considering inter-zonal power exchanges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 519-536.
    16. Keivan Rahimi-Adli & Egidio Leo & Benedikt Beisheim & Sebastian Engell, 2021. "Optimisation of the Operation of an Industrial Power Plant under Steam Demand Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, November.
    17. Karl-Kiên Cao & Kai von Krbek & Manuel Wetzel & Felix Cebulla & Sebastian Schreck, 2019. "Classification and Evaluation of Concepts for Improving the Performance of Applied Energy System Optimization Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-51, December.
    18. Huang, Zhijia & Lu, Yuehong & Wei, Mengmeng & Liu, Jingjing, 2017. "Performance analysis of optimal designed hybrid energy systems for grid-connected nearly/net zero energy buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1795-1809.
    19. Numbi, B.P. & Xia, X., 2016. "Optimal energy control of a crushing process based on vertical shaft impactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1653-1661.
    20. Gaigalis, Vygandas & Skema, Romualdas, 2015. "Analysis of the fuel and energy transition in Lithuanian industry and its sustainable development in 2005–2013 in compliance with the EU policy and strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-279.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:51-:d:1304754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.