IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2023i1p184-d1309549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ternary Fe- or Mo-Au-Ni/GDC as Candidate Fuel Electrodes for the Internal Dry Reforming of CH 4 : Physicochemical and Kinetic Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelia Ioannidou

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), GR-26504 Patras, Greece)

  • Stylianos G. Neophytides

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), GR-26504 Patras, Greece)

  • Dimitrios K. Niakolas

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), GR-26504 Patras, Greece
    Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece)

Abstract

The present study deals with the physicochemical and catalytic/kinetic investigation of Fe, Au, Fe-Au, and Mo-Au modified Ni/GDC electrocatalysts towards their performance for the DRM, RWGS, and CH 4 decomposition reactions. For this purpose, Au-NiO/GDC (where Au = 1 or 3 wt.%), Fe-NiO/GDC (where Fe = 0.5 or 2 wt.%), 0.5Fe-3Au-NiO/GDC, and 0.4Mo-3Au-NiO/GDC were synthesized via deposition (co-) precipitation. There is discussion on the structural properties of the electrocatalysts on the oxidized and reduced state, as well as their use as electrolyte-supported (half) cells. A key remark after H 2 -reduction is the formation of binary or ternary solid solutions. Ni/GDC was the most active for the catalytic CO 2 reforming of CH 4 and the CH 4 decomposition reactions and as a result the most prone to carbon deposition. On the other hand, the modified 3Au-Ni/GDC, 0.5Fe-3Au-Ni/GDC, and 0.4Mo-3Au-Ni/GDC exhibited the following properties: (i) the highest E a,app for the non-desired RWGS reaction, (ii) high tolerance to carbon formation due to lower activity for the CH 4 decomposition, and (iii) were also less active for H 2 and CO production. Finally, 0.4Mo-3Au-Ni/GDC seems to perform the DRM reaction through a different mechanism when compared to Ni/GDC. Overall, the above three samples are proposed as potential fuel electrodes for further electrocatalytic measurements for the SOFC internal DRM process.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelia Ioannidou & Stylianos G. Neophytides & Dimitrios K. Niakolas, 2023. "Ternary Fe- or Mo-Au-Ni/GDC as Candidate Fuel Electrodes for the Internal Dry Reforming of CH 4 : Physicochemical and Kinetic Investigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:184-:d:1309549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Ming & van der Kleij, A. & Verkooijen, A.H.M. & Aravind, P.V., 2013. "An experimental study of the interaction between tar and SOFCs with Ni/GDC anodes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 149-157.
    2. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    2. Komatsu, Y. & Brus, G. & Kimijima, S. & Szmyd, J.S., 2014. "The effect of overpotentials on the transient response of the 300W SOFC cell stack voltage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 352-359.
    3. Jeong, Yong-Seong & Kim, Jong-Woo & Seo, Myung-Won & Mun, Tae-Young & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2021. "Characteristics of two-stage air gasification of polystyrene with active carbon as a tar removal agent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Yu, Fangyong & Xiao, Jie & Zhang, Yapeng & Cai, Weizi & Xie, Yongmin & Yang, Naitao & Liu, Jiang & Liu, Meilin, 2019. "New insights into carbon deposition mechanism of nickel/yttrium-stabilized zirconia cermet from methane by in situ investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Tao Li & Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman & Faidzul Hakim Adnan & Kang Li, 2023. "Progress in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Hydrocarbon Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    6. Alvaro Fernandes & Joerg Brabandt & Oliver Posdziech & Ali Saadabadi & Mayra Recalde & Liyuan Fan & Eva O. Promes & Ming Liu & Theo Woudstra & Purushothaman Vellayan Aravind, 2018. "Design, Construction, and Testing of a Gasifier-Specific Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Cavalli, A. & Kunze, M. & Aravind, P.V., 2018. "Cross-influence of toluene as tar model compound and HCl on Solid Oxide Fuel Cell anodes in Integrated Biomass Gasifier SOFC Systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    9. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Cinti, G. & Gallorini, F. & Pöniz, M., 2017. "SOFC stack coupled with dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 498-507.
    10. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2017. "The fate of SOFC anodes under biomass producer gas contaminants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1050-1066.
    11. Chen, Qianyang & Qiu, Qianyuan & Yan, Xiaomin & Zhou, Mingyang & Zhang, Yapeng & Liu, Zhijun & Cai, Weizi & Wang, Wei & Liu, Jiang, 2020. "A compact and seal-less direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell stack stepping into practical application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Fernandes, A. & Woudstra, T. & van Wijk, A. & Verhoef, L. & Aravind, P.V., 2016. "Fuel cell electric vehicle as a power plant and SOFC as a natural gas reformer: An exergy analysis of different system designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 13-28.
    13. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    14. Subotić, Vanja & Baldinelli, Arianna & Barelli, Linda & Scharler, Robert & Pongratz, Gernot & Hochenauer, Christoph & Anca-Couce, Andrés, 2019. "Applicability of the SOFC technology for coupling with biomass-gasifier systems: Short- and long-term experimental study on SOFC performance and degradation behaviour," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    15. Papurello, Davide & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi & Santarelli, Massimo, 2016. "The effect of heavy tars (toluene and naphthalene) on the electrochemical performance of an anode-supported SOFC running on bio-syngas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 747-753.
    16. Amedi, Hamid Reza & Bazooyar, Bahamin & Pishvaie, Mahmoud Reza, 2015. "Control of anode supported SOFCs (solid oxide fuel cells): Part I. mathematical modeling and state estimation within one cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 605-621.
    17. Choi, Min-Jun & Jeong, Yong-Seong & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2021. "Air gasification of polyethylene terephthalate using a two-stage gasifier with active carbon for the production of H2 and CO," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Huang, Liwen & Wang, Jia & Lin, Wen-Feng & Wu, Yan, 2023. "Layer-structured Li1-xNaxNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2-δ oxide anode for enhancing ceria electrolyte based solid ceramic fuel cell operating at lower temperatures down to 370 °C," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    19. Choi, Young-Kon & Mun, Tae-Young & Cho, Min-Hwan & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2016. "Gasification of dried sewage sludge in a newly developed three-stage gasifier: Effect of each reactor temperature on the producer gas composition and impurity removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 121-128.
    20. Zhao, Hongbin & Jiang, Ting & Hou, Hucan, 2015. "Performance analysis of the SOFC–CCHP system based on H2O/Li–Br absorption refrigeration cycle fueled by coke oven gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 983-993.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:184-:d:1309549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.