IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2023i1p112-d1306794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Performance of Monopile-Supported Wind Turbines (MWTs) under Different Operating and Ground Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Shaohui Xiao

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Hongjun Liu

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Kun Lin

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

A monopile is the most popular foundation type for wind turbines. However, the dynamic performance of monopile-supported wind turbines under different operating and ground conditions is not fully understood. In this study, an integrated monopile-supported wind turbine model in a wind tunnel was employed to jointly simulate the operating and ground conditions. A series of wind tunnel tests were designed and performed to investigate the dynamic performance of monopile-supported wind turbines. These tests included seven operating conditions (seven wind speeds and corresponding rotor speeds) and four ground conditions (one fixed ground condition and three deformable ground conditions with different soil relative densities). According to the test results, the structural responses and dynamic characteristics were analyzed and discussed. This shows that the assumption of fixed-base support significantly overestimates the natural frequency but underestimates the global damping ratio. With the increase in soil relative density, the natural frequency slightly increases, while the damping ratio decreases more significantly. With the increase in the wind speed and rotor speed, the increase in global damping is larger on softer ground. A regression analysis was performed to estimate the global damping ratio under different operating and ground conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaohui Xiao & Hongjun Liu & Kun Lin, 2023. "Dynamic Performance of Monopile-Supported Wind Turbines (MWTs) under Different Operating and Ground Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:112-:d:1306794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/1/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozbek, Muammer & Rixen, Daniel J. & Erne, Oliver & Sanow, Gunter, 2010. "Feasibility of monitoring large wind turbines using photogrammetry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4802-4811.
    2. Hong, Lixuan & Möller, Bernd, 2011. "Offshore wind energy potential in China: Under technical, spatial and economic constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4482-4491.
    3. Wang, Xuefei & Zeng, Xiangwu & Yang, Xu & Li, Jiale, 2019. "Seismic response of offshore wind turbine with hybrid monopile foundation based on centrifuge modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1335-1350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2014. "Study on offshore wind power potential and wind farm optimization in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 519-531.
    2. Wang, Xuefei & Zeng, Xiangwu & Li, Xinyao & Li, Jiale, 2019. "Investigation on offshore wind turbine with an innovative hybrid monopile foundation: An experimental based study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 129-141.
    3. Yanez-Rosales, Pablo & Río-Gamero, B. Del & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta, 2024. "Rationale for selecting the most suitable areas for offshore wind energy farms in isolated island systems. Case study: Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Davidson, Michael & Gunturu, Bhaskar & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang & Karplus, Valerie, 2013. "An Integrated Assessment of China’s Wind Energy Potential," Conference papers 332410, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Wei, Youzhou & Zou, Qing-Ping & Lin, Xianghong, 2021. "Evolution of price policy for offshore wind energy in China: Trilemma of capacity, price and subsidy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Nie, Bingchuan & Li, Jiachun, 2018. "Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 391-399.
    7. Li, Delei & Geyer, Beate & Bisling, Peter, 2016. "A model-based climatology analysis of wind power resources at 100-m height over the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 575-589.
    8. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2018. "Impact of government subsidies on economic feasibility of offshore wind system: Implications for Taiwan energy policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 336-345.
    9. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Bosch, Jonathan & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "Temporally explicit and spatially resolved global offshore wind energy potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 766-781.
    11. Guerrero-Lemus, Ricardo & Nuez, Ignacio de la & González-Díaz, Benjamín, 2018. "Rebuttal letter to the article entitled: “Spatial planning to estimate the offshore wind energy potential in coastal regions and islands. Practical case: The Canary Islands”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 12-16.
    12. Li, Jiangxia & Pan, Shunqi & Chen, Yongping & Yao, Yu & Xu, Conghao, 2022. "Assessment of combined wind and wave energy in the tropical cyclone affected region:An application in China seas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Tuy, Soklin & Lee, Han Soo & Chreng, Karodine, 2022. "Integrated assessment of offshore wind power potential using Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) downscaling with Sentinel-1 satellite imagery, optimal sites, annual energy production and equivalent C," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Liu, Fa & Sun, Fubao & Wang, Xunming, 2023. "Impact of turbine technology on wind energy potential and CO2 emission reduction under different wind resource conditions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    15. Pichan, Mohammad & Rastegar, Hasan & Monfared, Mohammad, 2013. "Two fuzzy-based direct power control strategies for doubly-fed induction generators in wind energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 154-162.
    16. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2014. "Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farms development in Region of Murcia, Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 311-324.
    17. Lu, Xi & McElroy, Michael B. & Nielsen, Chris P. & Chen, Xinyu & Huang, Junling, 2013. "Optimal integration of offshore wind power for a steadier, environmentally friendlier, supply of electricity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 131-138.
    18. Cooperman, Aubryn & Martinez, Marcias, 2015. "Load monitoring for active control of wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 189-201.
    19. Meng Gao & Jicai Ning & Xiaoqing Wu, 2015. "Normal and Extreme Wind Conditions for Power at Coastal Locations in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Yang, Zihao & Dong, Sheng, 2024. "A novel framework for wind energy assessment at multi-time scale based on non-stationary wind speed models: A case study in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:112-:d:1306794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.