IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p3265-d1116731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristic Evaluation of Different Carbonization Processes for Hydrochar, Torrefied Char, and Biochar Produced from Cattle Manure

Author

Listed:
  • Eunhye Song

    (Bio Resource Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, Yongin 17180, Republic of Korea)

  • Ho Kim

    (Bio Resource Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, Yongin 17180, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyung Woo Kim

    (Bio Resource Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, Yongin 17180, Republic of Korea)

  • Young-Man Yoon

    (Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
    Plant Engineering Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, Yongin 17528, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The amount of cattle manure generated accounts for over 40% of the livestock manure in South Korea. Most livestock manure is utilized as a fertilizer and a soil amendment. However, the soil nutrients have exceeded saturation in South Korea. Accordingly, cattle manure, including lignocellulosic biomass, was applied for solid fuel production in this study. The three different types of carbonization process, namely, hydrothermal carbonization, torrefaction, and carbonization (slow pyrolysis), were estimated for a comparison of the hydrochar, torrefied char, and biochar characteristics derived from cattle manure. The processes were performed at temperatures ranging from 190 to 450 °C. The evaluation of the hydrochar, torrefied char, and biochar produced by three processes was conducted by the proximate, ultimate, calorific value, fuel ratio, and energy yield, which were used for the analysis of fuel quality. Additionally, the ash properties, including silicon dioxide, chlorine, and base-to-acid ratio (B/A) on hydrochar, torrefied char, and biochar were investigated to predict ash deposition during combustion. These analyses are essential to stabilize the operation of the combustion chamber. The thermogravimetric analysis represented the upgraded quality of hydrochar, torrefied char, and biochar by three different carbonization processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunhye Song & Ho Kim & Kyung Woo Kim & Young-Man Yoon, 2023. "Characteristic Evaluation of Different Carbonization Processes for Hydrochar, Torrefied Char, and Biochar Produced from Cattle Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3265-:d:1116731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Neng & Zhao, Peitao & Ghosh, Sudip & Fedyukhin, Alexander, 2019. "Co-hydrothermal carbonization of polyvinyl chloride and moist biomass to remove chlorine and inorganics for clean fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 882-892.
    2. Goyal, H.B. & Seal, Diptendu & Saxena, R.C., 2008. "Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 504-517, February.
    3. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    4. Yuan, Xinsong & He, Tao & Cao, Hongliang & Yuan, Qiaoxia, 2017. "Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 489-496.
    5. Michela Lucian & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2019. "Hydrothermal Carbonization Kinetics of Lignocellulosic Agro-Wastes: Experimental Data and Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    7. Gao, Pin & Zhou, Yiyuan & Meng, Fang & Zhang, Yihui & Liu, Zhenhong & Zhang, Wenqi & Xue, Gang, 2016. "Preparation and characterization of hydrochar from waste eucalyptus bark by hydrothermal carbonization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Numan Luthfi & Takashi Fukushima & Xiulun Wang & Kenji Takisawa, 2024. "Hydrochar as an Alternative to Coal: A Comparative Study of Lignocellulosic and Nonlignocellulosic Biomass," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eunhye Song & Seyong Park & Seongkuk Han & Eusil Lee & Ho Kim, 2022. "Characteristics of Hydrothermal Carbonization Hydrochar Derived from Cattle Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Bonassa, Gabriela & Schneider, Lara Talita & Canever, Victor Bruno & Cremonez, Paulo André & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Dieter, Jonathan & Teleken, Joel Gustavo, 2018. "Scenarios and prospects of solid biofuel use in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2365-2378.
    3. Cheng, Chen & Ding, Lu & Guo, Qinghua & He, Qing & Gong, Yan & Alexander, Kozlov N. & Yu, Guangsuo, 2022. "Process analysis and kinetic modeling of coconut shell hydrothermal carbonization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    4. Yao, Zhongliang & Ma, Xiaoqian & Xiao, Zhiyuan, 2020. "The effect of two pretreatment levels on the pyrolysis characteristics of water hyacinth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 514-527.
    5. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Pozarlik, A.K. & Bramer, E.A. & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, H. & Brem, G., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomass from nitrogen and phosphorus approach: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 401-415.
    6. Sánchez, M. & Clifford, B. & Nixon, J.D., 2018. "Modelling and evaluating a solar pyrolysis system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 630-638.
    7. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    8. Akbari, Maryam & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Kumar, Amit, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of wet and dry torrefaction of biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Nepal, Prakash & Runge, Troy & Bergman, Richard, 2023. "Environmental impacts and techno-economic assessments of biobased products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Wang, Tengfei & Zhai, Yunbo & Zhu, Yun & Li, Caiting & Zeng, Guangming, 2018. "A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 223-247.
    11. Pablo J. Arauzo & Maciej P. Olszewski & Andrea Kruse, 2018. "Hydrothermal Carbonization Brewer’s Spent Grains with the Focus on Improving the Degradation of the Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Mao, Xiaoming & Ye, Lian & Xu, Wanren & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Wang, Chuan, 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of maize straw for hydrochar production and its injection for blast furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    13. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    14. Zhang, Chaoyue & Ma, Xiaoqian & Chen, Xinfei & Tian, Yunlong & Zhou, Yi & Lu, Xiaoluan & Huang, Tao, 2020. "Conversion of water hyacinth to value-added fuel via hydrothermal carbonization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Sahoo, Abhisek & Kumar, Sachin & Mohanty, Kaustubha, 2021. "Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of Putranjiva roxburghii (putranjiva) and Cassia fistula (amaltas) non-edible oilseeds using thermogravimetric analyzer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 261-277.
    16. Shen, Yafei & Yu, Shili & Ge, Shun & Chen, Xingming & Ge, Xinlei & Chen, Mindong, 2017. "Hydrothermal carbonization of medical wastes and lignocellulosic biomass for solid fuel production from lab-scale to pilot-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 312-323.
    17. Shulun Han & Li Bai & Mingshu Chi & Xiuling Xu & Zhao Chen & Kecheng Yu, 2022. "Conversion of Waste Corn Straw to Value-Added Fuel via Hydrothermal Carbonization after Acid Washing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Umut Şen & Bruno Esteves & Helena Pereira, 2023. "Pyrolysis and Extraction of Bark in a Biorefineries Context: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Ma, Peiyong & Yang, Jing & Xing, Xianjun & Weihrich, Sebastian & Fan, Fangyu & Zhang, Xianwen, 2017. "Isoconversional kinetics and characteristics of combustion on hydrothermally treated biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1069-1076.
    20. Al-Rumaihi, Aisha & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Mckay, Gordon & Mackey, Hamish & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2022. "A review of pyrolysis technologies and feedstock: A blending approach for plastic and biomass towards optimum biochar yield," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3265-:d:1116731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.