IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1560-d1057691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioenergy for Community Energy Security in Canada: Challenges in the Business Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Vikas Menghwani

    (Department of Geography and Planning, Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada)

  • Rory Wheat

    (School of Environment and Sustainability, Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada)

  • Bobbie Balicki

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, 51 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada)

  • Greg Poelzer

    (School of Environment and Sustainability, Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada)

  • Bram Noble

    (Department of Geography and Planning, Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada)

  • Nicolas Mansuy

    (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 122 Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada)

Abstract

Bioenergy represents a viable renewable alternative for the many off-grid remote communities in Northern Canada that rely on diesel-based energy infrastructure. Despite the abundance of forest-based biomass, bioenergy for heat and power in Canada is used primarily in industrial contexts. Community-scale bioenergy, although growing, has been limited. Supply chain challenges, institutional and policy arrangements, and community perspectives indicate a need to better understand the ‘business ecosystem’ for bioenergy in Canada. The ecosystem includes technologies, community contexts, suppliers, developers, and policy makers. In this study, we explore the bioenergy business ecosystem challenges and perspectives from supply-side stakeholders. Interviews were conducted with representatives from the government, industry, and community—all working in bioenergy. The results indicate the following challenges facing the bioenergy ecosystem, with respect to community energy security: lack of cross-jurisdictional consistency in legislation and policies across Canada, structural issues such as subsidized energy and utility ownership, and misdirected support for local capacity building in the bioenergy sector. We also find that the existing support systems are prone to misuse, pointing to efficiency gaps in investment flows. The insights that emerge from this work, especially from industry stakeholders, are meaningful for communities and policy makers alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Vikas Menghwani & Rory Wheat & Bobbie Balicki & Greg Poelzer & Bram Noble & Nicolas Mansuy, 2023. "Bioenergy for Community Energy Security in Canada: Challenges in the Business Ecosystem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1560-:d:1057691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darvill, Rachel & Lindo, Zoë, 2015. "Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 153-161.
    2. Stephen, James D. & Mabee, Warren E. & Pribowo, Amadeus & Pledger, Sean & Hart, Randy & Tallio, Sheldon & Bull, Gary Q., 2016. "Biomass for residential and commercial heating in a remote Canadian aboriginal community," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 563-575.
    3. Karanasios, Konstantinos & Parker, Paul, 2018. "Tracking the transition to renewable electricity in remote indigenous communities in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 169-181.
    4. Heidi M. Neck & G. Dale Meyer & Boyd Cohen & Andrew C. Corbett, 2004. "An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 190-208, April.
    5. Christine Volkmann & Klaus Fichter & Magnus Klofsten & David B. Audretsch, 2021. "Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an emerging field of research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1047-1055, February.
    6. Coady, Joe & Duquette, Jean, 2021. "Quantifying the impacts of biomass driven combined heat and power grids in northern rural and remote communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2016. "Incorporating social benefits in multi-objective optimization of forest-based bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 721-735.
    8. Jennifer Buss & Nicolas Mansuy & Sebnem Madrali, 2021. "De-Risking Wood-Based Bioenergy Development in Remote and Indigenous Communities in Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Krupa, Joel, 2012. "Identifying barriers to aboriginal renewable energy deployment in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 710-714.
    10. Korhonen, Jouni & Wihersaari, Margareta & Savolainen, Ilkka, 2001. "Industrial ecosystem in the Finnish forest industry: using the material and energy flow model of a forest ecosystem in a forest industry system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 145-161, October.
    11. Yasunori Kikuchi & Yuichiro Kanematsu & Masamichi Ugo & Yosuke Hamada & Tatsuya Okubo, 2016. "Industrial Symbiosis Centered on a Regional Cogeneration Power Plant Utilizing Available Local Resources: A Case Study of Tanegashima," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(2), pages 276-288, April.
    12. Solomon, Barry D. & Barnett, John Brad & Wellstead, Adam M. & Rouleau, Mark D., 2020. "Deciphering support for woody biomass production for electric power using an ecosystem service framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Nicolas Mansuy & Diana Staley & Leila Taheriazad, 2020. "Woody Biomass Mobilization for Bioenergy in a Constrained Landscape: A Case Study from Cold Lake First Nations in Alberta, Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Cambero, Claudia & Hans Alexandre, Mariane & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2015. "Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of bioenergy generation alternatives using forest and wood residues in remote locations: A case study in British Columbia, Canada," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 59-72.
    15. Boyd Cohen, 2006. "Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vikas Menghwani & Chad Walker & Tim Kalke & Bram Noble & Greg Poelzer, 2022. "Harvesting Local Energy: A Case Study of Community-Led Bioenergy Development in Galena, Alaska," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Zapata, Oscar, 2022. "Renewable Energy and Community Development," OSF Preprints tk59y, Center for Open Science.
    3. Reis, Germano Glufke & Villar, Eduardo Guedes & Prado Gimenez, Fernando Antonio & Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte & Ferri, Priscila, 2022. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Fahimeh Khatami & Veronica Scuotto & Norris Krueger & Valter Cantino, 2022. "The influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model on sustainable innovation from a macro-level lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1419-1451, December.
    5. Quoc Hoang Thai & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Tung Thanh Do, 2023. "An Evolution of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Studies: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    6. Stephen Mago & Stephan van der Merwe, 2023. "Exploring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    7. Theodoraki, Christina & Dana, Léo-Paul & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 346-360.
    8. Sara Moggi & Paul Pierce & Nicole Bernardi, 2022. "From sustainability to thrivability: A novel framework for entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 829-853, June.
    9. Allan Villegas-Mateos, 2022. "Toward a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Jann Michael Weinand & Maximilian Hoffmann & Jan Gopfert & Tom Terlouw & Julian Schonau & Patrick Kuckertz & Russell McKenna & Leander Kotzur & Jochen Lin{ss}en & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Global LCOEs of decentralized off-grid renewable energy systems," Papers 2212.12742, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    11. Obiora S. Agu & Lope G. Tabil & Edmund Mupondwa, 2023. "Actualization and Adoption of Renewable Energy Usage in Remote Communities in Canada by 2050: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Coady, Joe & Duquette, Jean, 2021. "Quantifying the impacts of biomass driven combined heat and power grids in northern rural and remote communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Régis Y. Chenavaz & Alexandra Couston & Stéphanie Heichelbech & Isabelle Pignatel & Stanko Dimitrov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    14. Konstantinos Karanasios & Paul Parker, 2018. "Explaining the Diffusion of Renewable Electricity Technologies in Canadian Remote Indigenous Communities through the Technological Innovation System Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    15. Bertello, Alberto & Battisti, Enrico & De Bernardi, Paola & Bresciani, Stefano, 2022. "An integrative framework of knowledge-intensive and sustainable entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 683-693.
    16. Sanjay Chaudhary & Puneet Kaur & Hind Alofaysan & Jantje Halberstadt & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "Connecting the dots? Entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable entrepreneurship as pathways to sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5935-5951, December.
    17. Maria Urbaniec & Mariusz Sołtysik & Anna Prusak & Konrad Kułakowski & Magdalena Wojnarowska, 2022. "Fostering sustainable entrepreneurship by business strategies: An explorative approach in the bioeconomy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 251-267, January.
    18. Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. & Olabode, Joshua K. & Rafi, Syed K., 2021. "Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions and human development: Empirical comparison of the trajectories of world regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1836-1848.
    19. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    20. Donald F. Kuratko & Greg Fisher & James M. Bloodgood & Jeffrey S. Hornsby, 2017. "The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 119-140, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1560-:d:1057691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.