IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1264-d1045975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-Treatment of Separately Collected Biowaste as a Way to Increase Methane Production and Digestate Stability

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Bernat

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Thi Cam Tu Le

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Magdalena Zaborowska

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Dorota Kulikowska

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

To produce a valuable final product from anaerobic digestion (AD), one of the preferred methods of organic recycling, high quality feedstock must be ensured. In this study, separately collected real biowaste (B) was used, consisting of 90% food waste and 10% green waste. The priority issues of AD are both high methane production (MP) and high organics removal efficiency (as organic matter, OM and dissolved organics, and D COD ), which may be improved after pre-treatment. In this study, the effect of hydrothermal pre-treatment (B HT ) and enzymatic additives (B E ) on MP and organics removal from biowaste in mesophilic (37 °C) conditions was analyzed. To assess the adequacy of pre-treatment application, biowaste without treatment (B WT ) was used. Pre-treatment of biowaste prior to AD affected the maximal MP, the removal effectiveness of both OM and D COD , and the kinetic parameters of these processes. For B WT , the maximal cumulative MP reached 239.40 ± 1.27 NL/kg OM; the kinetic coefficient of MP (k CH4 ) and the initial MP rate (r CH4 ) were 0.32 ± 0.02 d −1 and 76.80 ± 1.10 NL/(kg OM·d), respectively. After hydrothermal pre-treatment, the MP of B HT (253.60 ± 1.83 NL/kg OM) was 6.3% higher than B WT . However, the highest MP was found for B E , 268.20 ± 1.37 NL/kg OM; to compare, it increased by 12.1% and 5.5% with B WT and B HT , respectively. However, the kinetic parameters of MP were highest with B HT :k CH4 0.56 ± 0.02 d −1 vs. 0.32 ± 0.02 d −1 (B WT ) and 0.34 ± 0.02 d −1 (B E ); r CH4 141.80 ± 0.02 NL/(kg OM·d) (B HT ) vs. 76.80 ± 1.10 NL/(kg OM·d) (B WT ) and 89.80 ± 0.50 NL/(kg OM·d) (B E ). The effectiveness of OM removal was highest with B E , similarly to the MP with the use of an enzymatic additive. The kinetics of OM removal (r OM , k OM ) were highest with B HT , similarly to the kinetics of MP (r CH4 , k CH4 ). The highest effectiveness of OM and, consequently, its lowest final content obtained with BE means that the organics were used most efficiently, which, in turn, may result in obtaining a more stable digestive system.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Bernat & Thi Cam Tu Le & Magdalena Zaborowska & Dorota Kulikowska, 2023. "Pre-Treatment of Separately Collected Biowaste as a Way to Increase Methane Production and Digestate Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1264-:d:1045975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    2. Shuijing Wang & Chenming Xu & Liyan Song & Jin Zhang, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Vasiliki Kamperidou & Paschalina Terzopoulou, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulosic Waste Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Katarzyna Bernat & Irena Wojnowska-Baryła & Magdalena Zaborowska & Izabela Samul, 2021. "Insight into the Composition of the Stabilized Residual from a Full-Scale Mechanical-Biological Treatment (MBT) Plant in Terms of the Potential Recycling and Recovery of Its Contaminants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    2. Chowdhury, M.M.I. & Nakhla, G. & Zhu, J., 2017. "Ultrasonically enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge using fluidized bed reactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 807-818.
    3. Niu, Xian & Zhang, Jianbin & Suo, Yonglu & Fu, Jilagamazhi, 2022. "Proteomic analysis of Fusarium sp. NF01 revealed a multi-level regulatory machinery for lignite biodegradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    5. Zhang, Chen & Li, Tinggang & Su, Guandong & He, Jianzhong, 2020. "Enhanced direct fermentation from food waste to butanol and hydrogen by an amylolytic Clostridium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 522-529.
    6. Żukowski, Witold & Jankowski, Dawid & Wrona, Jan & Berkowicz-Płatek, Gabriela, 2023. "Combustion behavior and pollutant emission characteristics of polymers and biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    7. Kyriakou, Maria & Patsalou, Maria & Xiaris, Nikolas & Tsevis, Athanasios & Koutsokeras, Loukas & Constantinides, Georgios & Koutinas, Michalis, 2020. "Enhancing bioproduction and thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via cell immobilization on biochar: Application in a citrus peel waste biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 53-64.
    8. Adrian Eugen Cioabla & Francisc Popescu & Timotei Bogdan Bacos, 2022. "Experimental Analysis for Determining Potential of Wastewater Sludge Mixed with Degraded Biomass as Substrates for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-9, November.
    9. Brémond, Ulysse & de Buyer, Raphaëlle & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernet, Nicolas & Carrere, Hélène, 2018. "Biological pretreatments of biomass for improving biogas production: an overview from lab scale to full-scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 583-604.
    10. Can, Ali, 2022. "Investigation of provincial capacity to produce biogas from waste disposal sites in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Aerobic Granular Sludge as a Substrate in Anaerobic Digestion—Current Status and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Yan, Mi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yucai & Xu, Aiming & Zhu, Gaojun & Jiang, Jiahao & Hantoko, Dwi, 2022. "Comprehensive experimental study on energy conversion of household kitchen waste via integrated hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Sangmin Kim & Seung-Gyun Woo & Joonyeob Lee & Dae-Hee Lee & Seokhwan Hwang, 2019. "Evaluation of Feasibility of Using the Bacteriophage T4 Lysozyme to Improve the Hydrolysis and Biochemical Methane Potential of Secondary Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Barua, Visva Bharati & Rathore, Vidhi & Kalamdhad, Ajay S., 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and banana peels with and without thermal pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 103-112.
    15. Przemysław Seruga & Małgorzata Krzywonos & Emilia den Boer & Łukasz Niedźwiecki & Agnieszka Urbanowska & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion as a Component of Circular Bioeconomy—Case Study Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Liana Vanyan & Adam Cenian & Karen Trchounian, 2022. "Biogas and Biohydrogen Production Using Spent Coffee Grounds and Alcohol Production Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    17. Ma, Chaonan & Liu, Jianyong & Ye, Min & Zou, Lianpei & Qian, Guangren & Li, Yu-You, 2018. "Towards utmost bioenergy conversion efficiency of food waste: Pretreatment, co-digestion, and reactor type," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 700-709.
    18. Matevž Zupančič & Valerija Možic & Matic Može & Franc Cimerman & Iztok Golobič, 2022. "Current Status and Review of Waste-to-Biogas Conversion for Selected European Countries and Worldwide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    19. Ma, Yingqun & Cai, Weiwei & Liu, Yu, 2017. "An integrated engineering system for maximizing bioenergy production from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 83-89.
    20. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1264-:d:1045975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.