IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4282-d1465222.html

Process Model and Life Cycle Assessment of Biorefinery Concept Using Agricultural and Industrial Residues for Biohydrogen Production

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Gamero

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Sophia Ruppert

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Robert Miehe

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management IFF, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Alexander Sauer

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable waste management strategies are urgently needed due to an increasing global population and increased waste production. In this context, biorefineries have recently emerged as a promising approach to valorize waste streams and supply a broad range of products. This study presents the process model and life cycle assessment (LCA) of a biorefinery concept using a novel biochemical method, a so-called “dark photosynthesis” conversion. This process is coupled to a photo-fermentation using microalgae. Overall, the biorefinery concept can produce hydrogen, lutein, β-carotene, and proteins for animal feed. Apple pomace from apple juice production is used as feedstock for the primary conversion step. A process model was created with the process simulation software Aspen Plus ® using experimental and literature data. Results from this model were then used in an LCA. The environmental impacts of the proposed biorefinery concept are relatively high, showing the need for process optimization in several areas. Energy system integration, stream recycling, and higher hydrogen yields are recognized as especially important for improving the environmental performance of this concept. Despite these findings, the model shows the feasibility of implementing the biochemical conversion technologies in a biorefinery concept for effectively utilizing residue streams.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Gamero & Sophia Ruppert & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2024. "Process Model and Life Cycle Assessment of Biorefinery Concept Using Agricultural and Industrial Residues for Biohydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4282-:d:1465222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    2. Shuijing Wang & Chenming Xu & Liyan Song & Jin Zhang, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad & Zhou, John L. & Li, Xiaowei & Afsari, Morteza & Altaee, Ali, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefany A. Valdez-Valdes & Lesly P. Tejeda-Benitez & Ángel D. González-Delgado, 2024. "Assessing the Environmental Impacts of the Valorization of Creole-Antillean Avocado via an Extractive-Based Biorefinery in the Montes de María Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salah, Mohamed & Tsui, To-Hung & Zhang, Le & Smoliński, Adam & Mohamed Rasmey, Abdel-Hamied & Tong, Yen Wah & Liu, Ronghou, 2026. "Progress in enhancing strategies for hydrogen production from microbial fermentation of organic wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).
    2. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Aditiya, H.B. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Huang, Z., 2026. "Scaling green hydrogen: Production, storage, techno-economics and global perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).
    4. Zhang, Huan & Liu, Tao & Liu, Wang & Zhou, Jianzhao & Zhang, Quanguo & Ren, Jingzheng, 2025. "An interpretable deep learning framework for photofermentation biological hydrogen production and process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    5. Liu, Xinxin & Zhao, Junhui & He, Chao & Liu, Liang & Li, Gang & Pan, Xiaohui & Xu, Guizhuan & Lu, Chaoyang & Zhang, Quanguo & Jiao, Youzhou, 2023. "A new approach for evaluating photosynthetic bio-hydrogen production: The dissipation rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Shabarish Shankaran & Tamilarasan Karuppiah & Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2023. "Statistical Optimization of Chemo Sonic Liquefaction in Macroalgae for Biohydrogen Generation—An Energy-Effective Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Li, Xinxin & Tong, Jingjing & Yuan, Maomao & Song, Mei & Gao, Jingsi & Zhu, Jia & Liu, Yanping, 2023. "Demonstrating the application of batch anaerobic digestion recirculating slurry inoculation of food waste engineering from a microbiological perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Shuang Liu & Wenzhe Li & Guoxiang Zheng & Haiyan Yang & Longhai Li, 2020. "Optimization of Cattle Manure and Food Waste Co-Digestion for Biohydrogen Production in a Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Zdeněk Jegla & Silvio Bonaita & Komi Apélété Amou & Marcus Reppich, 2025. "Assessing the Theoretical Biohydrogen Potential from Agricultural Residues Using Togo as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Cvetković, Slobodan & Perendija, Jovana & Dželetović, Željko & Janković, Marija & Janković, Bojan & Grbović Novaković, Jasmina & Cvetinović, Dejan, 2025. "Harvesting renewable hydrogen from an energy crop in Serbia: Quantifying the energy saving potential, possible utilization, and environmental benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    11. Ahmed Fathy & Hegazy Rezk & Dalia Yousri & Abdullah G. Alharbi & Sulaiman Alshammari & Yahia B. Hassan, 2023. "Maximizing Bio-Hydrogen Production from an Innovative Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Yiyang Liu & Jingluo Min & Xingyu Feng & Yue He & Jinze Liu & Yixiao Wang & Jun He & Hainam Do & Valérie Sage & Gang Yang & Yong Sun, 2020. "A Review of Biohydrogen Productions from Lignocellulosic Precursor via Dark Fermentation: Perspective on Hydrolysate Composition and Electron-Equivalent Balance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    13. Cho, Si-Kyung & Trchounian, Karen & Reungsang, Alissara & Kumar, Vinod & Igliński, Bartłomiej & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan, 2025. "Critical factors influencing biohythane production from research to commercialization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    14. Jakub Soja & Tomasz Oniszczuk & Iryna Vaskina & Maciej Combrzyński & Agnieszka Wójtowicz, 2024. "Integration of Plant Pomace into Extruded Products: Analysis of Process Conditions, Post-Production Waste Properties and Biogas Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Mohamed Moffit, Mohamed Afiq & Suja', Fatihah & Kabir Ahmad, Irfana & Bhaskaran, Anusha Nair, 2025. "Biogas production and reactor performance of a pilot scale anaerobic biofilm digester treating food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Luo, Jianing & Yuan, Yanping & Joybari, Mahmood Mastani & Cao, Xiaoling, 2024. "Development of a prediction-based scheduling control strategy with V2B mode for PV-building-EV integrated systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    18. Luo, Geng & Zhao, Zi-Tong & Ding, Jie & Yang, Shan-Shan & Yu, Xin-Lei & Bao, Mei-Yi & Sun, Han-Jun & Pang, Ji-Wei & Zhang, Lu-Yan & Ren, Nan-Qi, 2025. "Comparative review of carbon emissions from hydrogen production technologies: The hydrogen color characteristic of biomass-based manufacturing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Andrés Rengel & Alexander Aguila Téllez & Leony Ortiz & Milton Ruiz, 2023. "Optimal Insertion of Energy Storage Systems Considering the Economic Dispatch and the Minimization of Energy Not Supplied," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Liu, Zipeng & Zhang, Meixi & Bauer, Christian & McKenna, Russell, 2025. "The role of low carbon fuels towards net-zero in integrated assessment models and energy system models: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4282-:d:1465222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.