IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i20p7217-d1265727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO 2 Injection via a Horizontal Well into the Coal Seam at the Experimental Mine Barbara in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Stańczyk

    (Department of Acoustics, Electronics and IT Solutions, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Robert Hildebrandt

    (Department of Underground Research and Surface Maintenance, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Jarosław Chećko

    (Department of Geology and Geophysics and Surface Protection, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Tomasz Urych

    (Department of Geology and Geophysics and Surface Protection, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Marian Wiatowski

    (Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Shakil Masum

    (Geoenvironmental Research Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Sivachidambaram Sadasivam

    (Geoenvironmental Research Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Thomas Kempka

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Christopher Otto

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Priscilla Ernst

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

  • Hywel Rhys Thomas

    (Geoenvironmental Research Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

Abstract

This study, conducted as part of the ROCCS project, investigates the potential of coal seams for CO 2 sequestration through in situ tests. The in situ tests, performed at Experimental Mine Barbara in Mikołów, Poland, involved injecting CO 2 through a horizontal well into a coal seam, with variable well lengths and injection parameters. The experiments included monitoring for CO 2 leakage and migration within the coal seam. The objective was to examine the correlation between the CO 2 injection rate and the coal–CO 2 contact area, monitoring for any potential leakage. The total mass of CO 2 injected was about 7700 kg. Significant leakage, probably due to the formation of preferential pathways, prevented pressure buildup in the injection well. The results provide insights into challenges regarding CO 2 injection into coal seams, with implications for the design of commercial-scale CO 2 storage installations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Stańczyk & Robert Hildebrandt & Jarosław Chećko & Tomasz Urych & Marian Wiatowski & Shakil Masum & Sivachidambaram Sadasivam & Thomas Kempka & Christopher Otto & Priscilla Ernst & Hywel Rhys Tho, 2023. "CO 2 Injection via a Horizontal Well into the Coal Seam at the Experimental Mine Barbara in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7217-:d:1265727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruhn, Thomas & Naims, Henriette & Olfe-Kräutlein, Barbara, 2016. "Separating the debate on CO2 utilisation from carbon capture and storage," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 38-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Trubetskaya, 2022. "Reactivity Effects of Inorganic Content in Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Lena Mikhelkis & Venkatesh Govindarajan, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Partial Environmental Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCU/S): Case Study from Proposed Waste-Fed District-Heating Inciner," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Parisa Rafiaani & Zoumpolia Dikopoulou & Miet Dael & Tom Kuppens & Hossein Azadi & Philippe Lebailly & Steven Passel, 2020. "Identifying Social Indicators for Sustainability Assessment of CCU Technologies: A Modified Multi-criteria Decision Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 15-44, January.
    5. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Han, Rong & Yu, Bi-Ying & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. van Heek, Julia & Arning, Katrin & Ziefle, Martina, 2017. "Reduce, reuse, recycle: Acceptance of CO2-utilization for plastic products," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 53-66.
    7. Ilkka Hannula & David M Reiner, 2017. "The race to solve the sustainable transport problem via carbon-neutral synthetic fuels and battery electric vehicles," Working Papers EPRG 1721, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Meunier, Nicolas & Chauvy, Remi & Mouhoubi, Seloua & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1192-1203.
    9. Arning, K. & Offermann-van Heek, J. & Linzenich, A. & Kaetelhoen, A. & Sternberg, A. & Bardow, A. & Ziefle, M., 2019. "Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 235-249.
    10. Wim Carton & Adeniyi Asiyanbi & Silke Beck & Holly J. Buck & Jens F. Lund, 2020. "Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    11. Pavel Tcvetkov, 2021. "Climate Policy Imbalance in the Energy Sector: Time to Focus on the Value of CO 2 Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Koytsoumpa, E.I. & Magiri – Skouloudi, D. & Karellas, S. & Kakaras, E., 2021. "Bioenergy with carbon capture and utilization: A review on the potential deployment towards a European circular bioeconomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Xiping Wang & Shaoyuan Qie, 2018. "Study on the investment timing of carbon capture and storage under different business modes," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 639-649, August.
    14. Hanne Lamberts-Van Assche & Tine Compernolle, 2022. "Using Real Options Thinking to Value Investment Flexibility in Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Biancolillo Ilaria & Paletto Alessandro & Bersier Jacques & Keller Michael & Romagnoli Manuela, 2020. "A literature review on forest bioeconomy with a bibliometric network analysis," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(7), pages 265-279.
    16. Shuai Nie & Guotian Cai & Yixuan Li & Yushu Chen & Ruxue Bai & Liping Gao & Xiaoyu Chen, 2022. "To Adopt CCU Technology or Not? An Evolutionary Game between Local Governments and Coal-Fired Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    18. Pavel Tcvetkov & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Sergey Fedoseev, 2019. "The Changing Role of CO 2 in the Transition to a Circular Economy: Review of Carbon Sequestration Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Linzenich, Anika & Arning, Katrin & Ziefle, Martina, 2021. "Acceptance of energy technologies in context: Comparing laypeople's risk perceptions across eight infrastructure technologies in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7217-:d:1265727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.