IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6615-d1239677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Performance Indicators for Small-Scale Hydropower Project Attractiveness Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Augusto Cesar Campos de Souza Machado

    (Institute of Natural Resources (IRN), Itajuba Federal University, Itajuba 37500-903, MG, Brazil)

  • Geraldo Lucio Tiago Filho

    (Institute of Natural Resources (IRN), Itajuba Federal University, Itajuba 37500-903, MG, Brazil)

  • Thiago Modesto de Abreu

    (Institute of Electrical Systems and Energy (ISEE), Itajuba Federal University, Itajuba 37500-903, MG, Brazil)

  • Francesco Facchini

    (Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Robson Francisco da Silva

    (Industrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

  • Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Pinto

    (Industrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Small-scale hydropower plants (SHP) have been losing competitiveness compared to other renewable sources in the global electricity matrix due to technical, environmental, regulatory, and economic issues. In this context, and to contribute to the development and strengthening of SHP’s integration into the country’s electricity matrix, this study proposes the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategic evaluation tool for SHP projects from the prospecting phase to the pre-implementation phase, taking into account financial and non-financial performance indicators. This study aims to structure a strategic map of the SHP source composed of economic, socio-environmental, institutional, and technical perspectives, adapted to the four perspectives of the BSC, with the required performance indicators for the strategic evaluation of SHP. The development of a computer program allowed data visualization from eight case studies focusing on indicators or perspectives that jeopardize the project’s strategic viability. The results showed that (i) the adaptation of the BSC methodology for the strategic evaluation of SHP feasibility proved effective and (ii) the developed computer program demonstrated robustness and effectiveness in analyzing SHP, even in different stages of development and with different technical and environmental characteristics. Finally, the strategic evaluation of SHP feasibility is an effective tool in assisting decision makers, indicating the positive aspects and weaknesses of the project under evaluation and providing a better understanding of the asset and the areas of development that deserve greater attention to improve its performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Augusto Cesar Campos de Souza Machado & Geraldo Lucio Tiago Filho & Thiago Modesto de Abreu & Francesco Facchini & Robson Francisco da Silva & Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Pinto, 2023. "Use of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Performance Indicators for Small-Scale Hydropower Project Attractiveness Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6615-:d:1239677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dincer, Hasan & Yuksel, Serhat, 2019. "Balanced scorecard-based analysis of investment decisions for the renewable energy alternatives: A comparative analysis based on the hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1259-1270.
    2. Furlan, Claudia & Mortarino, Cinzia, 2018. "Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1879-1886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crescenzo Pepe & Silvia Maria Zanoli, 2024. "Digitalization, Industry 4.0, Data, KPIs, Modelization and Forecast for Energy Production in Hydroelectric Power Plants: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-35, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brumana, Giovanni & Franchini, Giuseppe & Ghirardi, Elisa & Perdichizzi, Antonio, 2022. "Techno-economic optimization of hybrid power generation systems: A renewables community case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Zhou, Dequn & Wu, Changsong & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2019. "Response of scale and leverage of thermal power enterprises to renewable power enterprises in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "Models for Predicting Non-Renewable Energy Competing with Renewable Source for Sustainable Energy Development: Case of Asia and Oceania Region," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 133-160, December.
    4. Sreekanth Manavalla & Feroskhan M. & Joseph Daniel & Sivakumar Ramasamy & T. M. Yunus Khan & Rahmath Ulla Baig & Naif Almakayeel & Bhanu Kiran Voddin Tirumalapur, 2023. "System Design, Optimization and 2nd Law Analysis of a 100 MWe Double Reheat s-CO 2 Power Plant at Full Load and Part Loads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Muhammad Raza & Ali Saleh Alshebami & Amena Sibghatullah, 2020. "Factors Influencing Renewable Energy Technological Innovation in Malaysia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 573-579.
    6. Li, Xiangrong & Zhu, Shaoying & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan & Ubay, Gözde Gülseven, 2020. "Kano-based mapping of innovation strategies for renewable energy alternatives using hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Quezada, Luis E. & López-Ospina, Héctor A. & Ortiz, César & Oddershede, Astrid M. & Palominos, Pedro I. & Jofré, Paulina A., 2022. "A DEMATEL-based method for prioritizing strategic projects using the perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. Wu, Yunna & Liao, Mingjuan & Hu, Mengyao & Lin, Jiawei & Zhou, Jianli & Zhang, Buyuan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2020. "A decision framework of low-speed wind farm projects in hilly areas based on DEMATEL-entropy-TODIM method from the sustainability perspective: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Pengran Zhou & Pengfei Zhou & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Gülsüm Sena Uluer, 2019. "Balanced Scorecard-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Investment Projects with IT2 Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Andrea Savio & Luigi De Giovanni & Mariangela Guidolin, 2022. "Modelling Energy Transition in Germany: An Analysis through Ordinary Differential Equations and System Dynamics," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Cidália Oliveira & Margarida Rodrigues & Rui Silva & Galvão Meirinhos & Mário Franco, 2022. "BSC’s Perspectives Ranking towards Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study Performed with Portuguese Exporters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    13. Lu, Hongfang & Xu, FengYing & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Jun & Campbell, Daniel E. & Ren, Hai, 2019. "Emergy-based analysis of the energy security of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 123-135.
    14. Kumar, P. Manoj & Mylsamy, K., 2020. "A comprehensive study on thermal storage characteristics of nano-CeO2 embedded phase change material and its influence on the performance of evacuated tube solar water heater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 662-676.
    15. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    16. Bessi, Alessandro & Guidolin, Mariangela & Manfredi, Piero, 2021. "The role of gas on future perspectives of renewable energy diffusion: Bridging technology or lock-in?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Hasan Dincer, 2019. "Analysing Managers’ Financial Motivation for Sustainable Investment Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Rekha Guchhait & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Increasing Growth of Renewable Energy: A State of Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Kaytez, Fazıl, 2022. "Evaluation of priority strategies for the expansion of installed wind power capacity in Turkey using a fuzzy analytic network process analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1281-1293.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6615-:d:1239677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.