IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5509-d1198583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling Parameters in the Efficiency of Hydrogen Production via Electrification with Multi-Phase Plasma Processing Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Shariful Islam Bhuiyan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Kunpeng Wang

    (LTEOIL, LLC, 2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 200, Houston, TX 77019, USA)

  • Md Abdullah Hil Baky

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Jamie Kraus

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Howard Jemison

    (LTEOIL, LLC, 2929 Allen Parkway, Suite 200, Houston, TX 77019, USA)

  • David Staack

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

A nanosecond pulsed non-equilibrium plasma reactor is used to crack hydrocarbons into hydrogen and lighter intermediates at atmospheric pressure and warm temperature. The effects of power, capacitance, breakdown voltage, pulsing frequency, energy per pulse, and carrier gas type are investigated for product generation. Multiple gaseous products including hydrogen and hydrocarbons are calculated and compared at different conditions. A statistical analysis is performed on hydrogen yield for different experimental conditions to determine the significance of the studied parameters. Comparable hydrogen yields are produced when using methane (4 to 22 g-H 2 /kWh) as a carrier gas as compared to argon (7 to 14 g-H 2 /kWh). Although, notably, the methane carrier is more selective to hydrogen and sensitive to other operating parameters, the argon is not. Statistical analysis shows that plasma power, capacitance, and energy per pulse appear to influence hydrogen yield while pulsing frequency and breakdown voltage do not. A higher yield of hydrogen is achieved with low plasma power and a low energy per pulse, with a low capacitance for both cases of pure CH 4 and pure Ar. The results show that low plasma power based on a low energy per pulse of <10 mJ is preferable for hydrogen production in a batch reactor. This CO 2 -free hydrogen production method produces hydrogen from fossil fuels at less than USD 2/kg in electricity.

Suggested Citation

  • Shariful Islam Bhuiyan & Kunpeng Wang & Md Abdullah Hil Baky & Jamie Kraus & Howard Jemison & David Staack, 2023. "Controlling Parameters in the Efficiency of Hydrogen Production via Electrification with Multi-Phase Plasma Processing Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5509-:d:1198583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Napp, T.A. & Gambhir, A. & Hills, T.P. & Florin, N. & Fennell, P.S, 2014. "A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 616-640.
    2. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Khezri, Mohsen & Heshmati, Almas & Khodaei, Mehdi, 2022. "Environmental implications of economic complexity and its role in determining how renewable energies affect CO2 emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    4. Wang, Qiuying & Zhu, Xiaomei & Sun, Bing & Li, Zhi & Liu, Jinglin, 2022. "Hydrogen production from methane via liquid phase microwave plasma: A deoxidation strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoon, Hae-Sung & Kim, Eun-Seob & Kim, Min-Soo & Lee, Jang-Yeob & Lee, Gyu-Bong & Ahn, Sung-Hoon, 2015. "Towards greener machine tools – A review on energy saving strategies and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 870-891.
    2. Mikovits, Christian & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wehrle, Sebastian & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2021. "Stronger together: Multi-annual variability of hydrogen production supported by wind power in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    3. Dincbas, Tugba & Ergeneli, Azize & Yigitbasioglu, Hakan, 2021. "Clean technology adoption in the context of climate change: Application in the mineral products industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    5. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Chisalita, Dora Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Tawiah, Vincent & Khan, Irfan & Alvarado, Rafael & Li, Guo, 2022. "Ensuring sustainable consumption and production pattern in Africa: Evidence from green energy perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Andersson, Elias & Karlsson, Magnus & Thollander, Patrik & Paramonova, Svetlana, 2018. "Energy end-use and efficiency potentials among Swedish industrial small and medium-sized enterprises – A dataset analysis from the national energy audit program," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 165-177.
    9. Farajiamiri, Mina & Meyer, Jörn-Christian & Walther, Grit, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of renewable fuel supply chains regarding cost, land use, and water use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    10. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Byung-Lip Ahn & Ji-Woo Park & Seunghwan Yoo & Jonghun Kim & Hakgeun Jeong & Seung-Bok Leigh & Cheol-Yong Jang, 2015. "Synergetic Effect between Lighting Efficiency Enhancement and Building Energy Reduction Using Alternative Thermal Operating System of Indoor LED Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Gatfaoui, Hayette, 2015. "Pricing the (European) option to switch between two energy sources: An application to crude oil and natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 270-283.
    13. Hür Bütün & Ivan Kantor & François Maréchal, 2019. "An Optimisation Approach for Long-Term Industrial Investment Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    14. Sayama, Shogo & Yamamoto, Seiji, 2022. "A 6-kW thermally self-sustained two-stage CO2 methanation reactor: design and experimental evaluation of steady-state performance under full-load conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    15. Su, Chi-Wei & Pang, Li-Dong & Tao, Ran & Shao, Xuefeng & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Renewable energy and technological innovation: Which one is the winner in promoting net-zero emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Peng, Hua-Rong & Su, Bin, 2017. "Energy rebound effect in China's Industry: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 199-208.
    17. van Beek, Andries & Groote Schaarsberg, Mirjam & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert & Veneman, Mattijs, 2023. "Cost Allocation in CO2 Transport for CCUS Hubs : a Multi-Actor Perspective," Discussion Paper 2023-008, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Stefan Nabernegg & Birgit Bednar-Friedl & Fabian Wagner & Thomas Schinko & Janusz Cofala & Yadira Mori Clement, 2017. "The Deployment of Low Carbon Technologies in Energy Intensive Industries: A Macroeconomic Analysis for Europe, China and India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Reducing CO2 emissions in China's manufacturing industry: Evidence from nonparametric additive regression models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 161-173.
    20. Liu, Nan & Ma, Zujun & Kang, Jidong & Su, Bin, 2019. "A multi-region multi-sector decomposition and attribution analysis of aggregate carbon intensity in China from 2000 to 2015," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 410-421.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5509-:d:1198583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.