IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i12p4698-d1170736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Chemical and Physical Pretreatment on Methane Potential of Peanut Shells

Author

Listed:
  • Armando Oliva

    (Department of Microbiology and Ryan Institute, University of Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
    Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Stefano Papirio

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Giovanni Esposito

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Piet N. L. Lens

    (Department of Microbiology and Ryan Institute, University of Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

Abstract

The request for alternative sources of energy has led to evaluating untapped routes for energy production, such as using abundant and low-cost waste materials, e.g., lignocellulosic wastes, as the substrate for biological processes aimed at biofuel production. This study focused on peanut shells (PS) valorisation via anaerobic digestion (AD). Two emerging pretreatments, i.e., organosolv and ultrasounds, were investigated to unlock the full AD potential of PS. The impact of a substrate-to-solvent ratio in organosolv pretreatment was investigated (i.e., 1:5 vs. 1:10 vs. 1:20). Different exposure times were tested for ultrasound pretreatment, corresponding to applied energy densities of 30,000, 12,000, and 6000 kJ/kg VS, respectively. Organosolv pretreatment achieved the maximal polyphenol solubilisation, i.e., 4.90 mg/g TS, when increasing the substrate-to-solvent ratio, whereas methane production did not benefit from the pretreatment, being comparable with that of raw PS at most (i.e., 55.0 mL CH 4 /g VS). On the other hand, ultrasounds mainly affected sugar solubilisation (up to 37.90 mg/g TS), enhancing methane production up to an extra 64%, achieved with the highest energy density. The organosolv route would benefit from further downstream steps to recover the biomolecules released in the liquid fraction, whereas ultrasounds pretreatment provided a slurry suitable for direct AD.

Suggested Citation

  • Armando Oliva & Stefano Papirio & Giovanni Esposito & Piet N. L. Lens, 2023. "Impact of Chemical and Physical Pretreatment on Methane Potential of Peanut Shells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4698-:d:1170736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Zhenghui & Alshehri, Khaled & Li, Yuan & Qian, Hang & Sapsford, Devin & Cleall, Peter & Harbottle, Michael, 2022. "Advances in biological techniques for sustainable lignocellulosic waste utilization in biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Meneses-Quelal, W.O. & Velázquez-Martí, B. & Gaibor-Chávez, J. & Niño-Ruiz, Z., 2021. "Biochemical potential of methane (BMP) of camelid waste and the Andean region agricultural crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 406-415.
    3. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    4. Wang, Jianlong & Yin, Yanan, 2018. "Fermentative hydrogen production using various biomass-based materials as feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 284-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabarish Shankaran & Tamilarasan Karuppiah & Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2023. "Statistical Optimization of Chemo Sonic Liquefaction in Macroalgae for Biohydrogen Generation—An Energy-Effective Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio & Braglia, Roberto & Canini, Antonella, 2018. "Ampelodesmos mauritanicus pyrolysis biochar in anaerobic digestion process: Evaluation of the biogas yield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 663-669.
    3. Chalima, Angelina & Hatzidaki, Angeliki & Karnaouri, Anthi & Topakas, Evangelos, 2019. "Integration of a dark fermentation effluent in a microalgal-based biorefinery for the production of high-added value omega-3 fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 130-138.
    4. Liana Vanyan & Adam Cenian & Karen Trchounian, 2022. "Biogas and Biohydrogen Production Using Spent Coffee Grounds and Alcohol Production Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Karim, Ahasanul & Islam, M. Amirul & Mishra, Puranjan & Yousuf, Abu & Faizal, Che Ku Mohammad & Khan, Md. Maksudur Rahman, 2021. "Technical difficulties of mixed culture driven waste biomass-based biohydrogen production: Sustainability of current pretreatment techniques and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Magda Dudek & Marcin Dębowski & Anna Nowicka & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Zieliński, 2022. "The Effect of Autotrophic Cultivation of Platymonas subcordiformis in Waters from the Natural Aquatic Reservoir on Hydrogen Yield," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Khayum, Naseem & Anbarasu, S. & Murugan, S., 2018. "Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 760-768.
    8. Alanne, Kari & Cao, Sunliang, 2019. "An overview of the concept and technology of ubiquitous energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 284-302.
    9. A. E. Atabani & Eyas Mahmoud & Muhammed Aslam & Salman Raza Naqvi & Dagmar Juchelková & Shashi Kant Bhatia & Irfan Anjum Badruddin & T. M. Yunus Khan & Anh Tuan Hoang & Petr Palacky, 2023. "Emerging potential of spent coffee ground valorization for fuel pellet production in a biorefinery," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7585-7623, August.
    10. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Das, Devashish & Kim, Sun Chang & Cho, Byung-Kwan & Kalia, Vipin Chandra & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2021. "Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Shuang Liu & Wenzhe Li & Guoxiang Zheng & Haiyan Yang & Longhai Li, 2020. "Optimization of Cattle Manure and Food Waste Co-Digestion for Biohydrogen Production in a Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Sun, Chihe & Liao, Qiang & Xia, Ao & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xianqing & Zhu, Xun & Wang, Zhengxin, 2020. "Degradation and transformation of furfural derivatives from hydrothermal pre-treated algae and lignocellulosic biomass during hydrogen fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Nikolaj Kaae Kirk & Clara Navarrete & Jakob Ellegaard Juhl & José Luis Martínez & Alessandra Procentese, 2021. "The “Zero Miles Product” Concept Applied to Biofuel Production: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Horschig, Thomas & Adams, P.W.R. & Gawel, Erik & Thrän, Daniela, 2018. "How to decarbonize the natural gas sector: A dynamic simulation approach for the market development estimation of renewable gas in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 555-572.
    15. Agnieszka Urbanowska & Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz & Mateusz Wnukowski & Przemysław Seruga & Marcin Baranowski & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Monika Serafin-Tkaczuk & Krystian Krochmalny & Lukasz Niedzwi, 2020. "Treatment of Liquid By-Products of Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Agricultural Digestate Using Membrane Separation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Moreira, F.S. & Rodrigues, M.S. & Sousa, L.M. & Batista, F.R.X. & Ferreira, J.S. & Cardoso, V.L., 2022. "Single-stage repeated batch cycles using co-culture of Enterobacter cloacae and purple non-sulfur bacteria for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    17. Li, Kaiyu & Gao, Yitong & Zhang, Shengan & Liu, Guilian, 2022. "Study on the energy efficiency of bioethanol-based liquid hydrogen production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    18. Ochoa, Aitor & Bilbao, Javier & Gayubo, Ana G. & Castaño, Pedro, 2020. "Coke formation and deactivation during catalytic reforming of biomass and waste pyrolysis products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Yin, Yanan & Wang, Jianlong, 2019. "Hydrogen production and energy recovery from macroalgae Saccharina japonica by different pretreatment methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-8.
    20. Codignole Luz, Fàbio & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2018. "Biomass fast pyrolysis in a shaftless screw reactor: A 1-D numerical model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 792-805.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4698-:d:1170736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.