IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i8p2848-d793213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility Investigation of Hydrogen Refuelling Infrastructure for Heavy-Duty Vehicles in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Wahiba Yaïci

    (CanmetENERGY Research Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 1 Haanel Drive, Ottawa, ON K1A 1M1, Canada)

  • Michela Longo

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

A potentially viable solution to the problem of greenhouse gas emissions by vehicles in the transportation sector is the deployment of hydrogen as alternative fuel. A limitation to the diffusion of the hydrogen-fuelled vehicles option is the intricate refuelling stations that vehicles will require. This study examines the practical use of hydrogen fuel within the internal combustion engine (ICE)-powered long-haul, heavy-duty trucking vehicles. Specifically, it appraises the techno-economic feasibility of constructing a network of long-haul truck refuelling stations using hydrogen fuel, across Canada. Hydrogen fuel is chosen as an option for this study due to its low carbon emissions rate compared to diesel. This study also explores various operational methods, including variable technology integration levels and truck traffic flows, truck and pipeline delivery of hydrogen to stations, and the possibility of producing hydrogen onsite. The proposed models created for this work suggest important parameters for economic development, such as capital costs for station construction, the selling price of fuel, and the total investment cost for the infrastructure of a nation-wide refuelling station. Results showed that the selling price of hydrogen gas pipeline delivery option is more economically stable. Specifically, it was found that at 100% technology integration, the range in selling prices was between 8.3 and 25.1 CAD$/kg. Alternatively, at 10% technology integration, the range was from 12.7 to 34.1 CAD$/kg. Moreover, liquid hydrogen, which is delivered by trucks, generally had the highest selling price due to its very prohibitive storage costs. However, truck-delivered hydrogen stations provided the lowest total investment cost; the highest is shown by pipe-delivered hydrogen and onsite hydrogen production processes using high technology integration methods. It is worth mentioning that once hydrogen technology is more developed and deployed, the refuelling infrastructure cost is likely to decrease considerably. It is expected that the techno-economic model developed in this work will be useful to design and optimize new and more efficient hydrogen refuelling stations for any ICE vehicles or fuel cell vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahiba Yaïci & Michela Longo, 2022. "Feasibility Investigation of Hydrogen Refuelling Infrastructure for Heavy-Duty Vehicles in Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-31, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2848-:d:793213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/8/2848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt3345f3wx is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt5m29d821 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alazemi, Jasem & Andrews, John, 2015. "Automotive hydrogen fuelling stations: An international review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 483-499.
    4. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt4mg378cf is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mario Fargnoli & Nicolas Haber & Massimo Tronci, 2022. "Case Study Research to Foster the Optimization of Supply Chain Management through the PSS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Sharma, Sunita & Ghoshal, Sib Krishna, 2015. "Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1151-1158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Haifeng & Ampah, Jeffrey Dankwa & Afrane, Sandylove & Adun, Humphrey & Jin, Chao & Yao, Mingfa, 2023. "Deployment of hydrogen in hard-to-abate transport sectors under limited carbon dioxide removal (CDR): Implications on global energy-land-water system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Zhang, Shuo & Geng, Zihan & Li, Yingzi & Li, Xinxin & Chen, Li, 2024. "A novel two-stage optimal layout model of hydrogen refueling facility network based on green electricity hydrogen production: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China as case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sehatpour, Mohammad-Hadi & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Sehatpour, Hesam-eddin, 2017. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles in Iran using a multi-criteria approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 295-310.
    2. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Nithin Isaac & Akshay Kumar Saha, 2022. "Predicting Vehicle Refuelling Trips through Generalised Poisson Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Alina E. Kozhukhova & Stephanus P. du Preez & Dmitri G. Bessarabov, 2021. "Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion for Domestic and Safety Applications: A Critical Review of Catalyst Materials and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Granada, Camille E. & Hasan, Camila & Marder, Munique & Konrad, Odorico & Vargas, Luciano K. & Passaglia, Luciane M.P. & Giongo, Adriana & de Oliveira, Rafael R. & Pereira, Leandro de M. & de Jesus Tr, 2018. "Biogas from slaughterhouse wastewater anaerobic digestion is driven by the archaeal family Methanobacteriaceae and bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Tissierellaceae," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 840-846.
    6. Faubert, Patrick & Barnabé, Simon & Bouchard, Sylvie & Côté, Richard & Villeneuve, Claude, 2016. "Pulp and paper mill sludge management practices: What are the challenges to assess the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-133.
    7. Aasadnia, Majid & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2018. "Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 57-83.
    8. Zhang, Peiye & Liu, Ming & Mu, Ruiqi & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "Exergy-based control strategy design and dynamic performance enhancement for parabolic trough solar receiver-reactor of methanol decomposition reaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Sforzini, Matteo & de Santoli, Livio, 2022. "Technical, economic and environmental issues related to electrolysers capacity targets according to the Italian Hydrogen Strategy: A critical analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Rahman, Syed & Khan, Irfan Ahmed & Khan, Ashraf Ali & Mallik, Ayan & Nadeem, Muhammad Faisal, 2022. "Comprehensive review & impact analysis of integrating projected electric vehicle charging load to the existing low voltage distribution system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Yunesky Masip Macía & Pablo Rodríguez Machuca & Angel Alexander Rodríguez Soto & Roberto Carmona Campos, 2021. "Green Hydrogen Value Chain in the Sustainability for Port Operations: Case Study in the Region of Valparaiso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Mostafa Rezaei & Ali Mostafaeipour & Mojtaba Qolipour & Hamid-Reza Arabnia, 2018. "Hydrogen production using wind energy from sea water: A case study on Southern and Northern coasts of Iran," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(3), pages 333-357, May.
    13. Alviani, Vani Novita & Hirano, Nobuo & Watanabe, Noriaki & Oba, Masahiro & Uno, Masaoki & Tsuchiya, Noriyoshi, 2021. "Local initiative hydrogen production by utilization of aluminum waste materials and natural acidic hot-spring water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Product-Service Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: A Functional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Oscar Lopez Jaramillo & Joel Rinebold & Michael Kuby & Scott Kelley & Darren Ruddell & Rhian Stotts & Aimee Krafft & Elizabeth Wentz, 2021. "Hydrogen Station Location Planning via Geodesign in Connecticut: Comparing Optimization Models and Structured Stakeholder Collaboration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Samokhvalov, Alexander, 2017. "Hydrogen by photocatalysis with nitrogen codoped titanium dioxide," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 981-1000.
    17. Alīna Safronova & Aiga Barisa, 2023. "Hydrogen Horizons: A Bibliometric Review of Trends in Diverse Emission Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-37, September.
    18. Azadeh Maroufmashat & Michael Fowler, 2017. "Transition of Future Energy System Infrastructure; through Power-to-Gas Pathways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Zhaohua Wang & Chunyang Dong & Xuan Tang & Xuetao Qin & Xingwu Liu & Mi Peng & Yao Xu & Chuqiao Song & Jie Zhang & Xuan Liang & Sheng Dai & Ding Ma, 2022. "CO-tolerant RuNi/TiO2 catalyst for the storage and purification of crude hydrogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Janusz Krupanek & Mariusz Kalisz & Jonathan Smith, 2022. "Challenges for Sustainability in Packaging of Fresh Vegetables in Organic Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2848-:d:793213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.