IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2411-d779281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods for Sustainability Assessment of District Heating Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Janis Edmunds Daugavietis

    (Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)

  • Raimonda Soloha

    (Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)

  • Elina Dace

    (Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
    Department of Political Science, Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Jelena Ziemele

    (Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The sustainability of energy systems is increasingly assessed for development of more resilient, greener district heating (DH) systems. That requires compiling technological, environmental, and economic indicators in a social, political, and institutional context. This work investigates DH system sustainability analysis by five frequently applied multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods—WSM, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE and DEA. To compare the sustainability assessment results, a selection of 8 criteria describing 12 DH companies (DHC) was examined. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the most credible MCDA method. Criteria weights were changed: (1) individually for evaluation of the range of stability for alternatives (score of DHC performance); (2) individually by a fixed value to compare how each criterion weight change affected the average score of a result; and (3) to compare the AHP weighting method to an equal weight scenario. The results of sensitivity analysis along with literature investigation shows that all methods are suitable for sustainability analyses of DH systems while also having differences in the calculation process and in the interpretation of results. The generalized algorithm for sustainability analysis in the energy sector outlined in this study along with the documented features of the main MCDA methods can be used as a guide for future assessment of energy systems by researchers and industry professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Janis Edmunds Daugavietis & Raimonda Soloha & Elina Dace & Jelena Ziemele, 2022. "A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods for Sustainability Assessment of District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2411-:d:779281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Martín-Gamboa & Luis C. Dias & Paula Quinteiro & Fausto Freire & Luís Arroja & Ana Cláudia Dias, 2019. "Multi-Criteria and Life Cycle Assessment of Wood-Based Bioenergy Alternatives for Residential Heating: A Sustainability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Hiltunen, Pauli & Syri, Sanna, 2021. "Low-temperature waste heat enabling abandoning coal in Espoo district heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Xu, Bing & Nayak, Amar & Gray, David & Ouenniche, Jamal, 2016. "Assessing energy business cases implemented in the North Sea Region and strategy recommendations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 360-371.
    4. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    5. Ziemele, Jelena & Gravelsins, Armands & Blumberga, Andra & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2017. "Sustainability of heat energy tariff in district heating system: Statistic and dynamic methodologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 834-845.
    6. Dénarié, A. & Muscherà, M. & Calderoni, M. & Motta, M., 2019. "Industrial excess heat recovery in district heating: Data assessment methodology and application to a real case study in Milano, Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 170-182.
    7. Lipošćak, Marko & Afgan, Naim H. & Duić, Neven & da Graça Carvalho, Maria, 2006. "Sustainability assessment of cogeneration sector development in Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2276-2284.
    8. HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & ROSTAMY-MALKHALIFEH, Mohsen & AGRELL, Per J. & TAVANA , Madjid & MOHAMMADI, Fatemeh, 2015. "Extended Symmetric and Asymmetric Weight Assignment Methods in Data Envelopment Analysis," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2693, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Marguerite, C. & Andresen, G.B. & Dahl, M., 2018. "Multi-criteria analysis of storages integration and operation solutions into the district heating network of Aarhus – A simulation case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 81-88.
    10. Qianyun Wen & Qiyao Yan & Junjie Qu & Yang Liu, 2021. "Fuzzy Ensemble of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Heating Energy Transition in Danish Households," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Nazanin Vafaei & Rita A. Ribeiro & Luis M. Camarinha-Matos, 2018. "Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 19-38.
    12. M. Socorro García-Cascales & M. Teresa Lamata & J. Miguel Sánchez-Lozano, 2012. "Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 373-391, October.
    13. Per J. Agrell & Peter Bogetoft, 2016. "Endogenous Common Weights as a Collusive Instrument in Frontier-Based Regulation," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Juan Aparicio & C. A. Knox Lovell & Jesus T. Pastor (ed.), Advances in Efficiency and Productivity, chapter 0, pages 181-194, Springer.
    14. Grujić, Miodrag & Ivezić, Dejan & Živković, Marija, 2014. "Application of multi-criteria decision-making model for choice of the optimal solution for meeting heat demand in the centralized supply system in Belgrade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-350.
    15. Lygnerud, Kristina & Peltola-Ojala, Päivi, 2010. "Factors impacting district heating companies' decision to provide small house customers with heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 185-190, January.
    16. Ziemele, Jelena & Talcis, Normunds & Osis, Ugis & Dace, Elina, 2021. "A methodology for selecting a sustainable development strategy for connecting low heat density consumers to a district heating system by cascading of heat carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Adrian Sienicki & Kai Czornik & Piotr Borkowski, 2021. "Application of Smart Technologies in Metropolis GZM to Reduce Harmful Emissions in District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    18. Lund, Henrik & Werner, Sven & Wiltshire, Robin & Svendsen, Svend & Thorsen, Jan Eric & Hvelplund, Frede & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2014. "4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Athanasios Kolios & Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Munksgaard, Jesper & Pade, Lise-Lotte & Fristrup, Peter, 2005. "Efficiency gains in Danish district heating. Is there anything to learn from benchmarking?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(15), pages 1986-1997, October.
    21. Buffa, Simone & Cozzini, Marco & D’Antoni, Matteo & Baratieri, Marco & Fedrizzi, Roberto, 2019. "5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 504-522.
    22. Giuseppe Pinto & Elnaz Abdollahi & Alfonso Capozzoli & Laura Savoldi & Risto Lahdelma, 2019. "Optimization and Multicriteria Evaluation of Carbon-neutral Technologies for District Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    23. Krumm, Alexandra & Süsser, Diana & Blechinger, Philipp, 2022. "Modelling social aspects of the energy transition: What is the current representation of social factors in energy models?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    24. Dorotić, Hrvoje & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2019. "Economical, environmental and exergetic multi-objective optimization of district heating systems on hourly level for a whole year," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    25. Ziemele, Jelena & Pakere, Ieva & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2016. "The future competitiveness of the non-Emissions Trading Scheme district heating systems in the Baltic States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1579-1585.
    26. Fang Fang & Nan Wang, 2014. "Optimal Hierarchical Decision-Making for Heat Source Selection of District Heating Systems," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, November.
    27. Pakere, Ieva & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2020. "Solar power or solar heat: What will upraise the efficiency of district heating? Multi-criteria analyses approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    28. Abokersh, Mohamed Hany & Gangwar, Sachin & Spiekman, Marleen & Vallès, Manel & Jiménez, Laureano & Boer, Dieter, 2021. "Sustainability insights on emerging solar district heating technologies to boost the nearly zero energy building concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 893-913.
    29. Vasić, Goran, 2018. "Application of multi criteria analysis in the design of energy policy: Space and water heating in households – City Novi Sad, Serbia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 410-419.
    30. SAATI, Saber & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & AGRELL, Per J. & TAVANA, Madjid, 2012. "A common set of weight approach using an ideal decision making unit in data envelopment analysis," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2406, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    31. Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris & Xidonas, Panos & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2017. "Multicriteria decision support in local energy planning: An evaluation of alternative scenarios for the Sustainable Energy Action Plan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-16.
    32. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    33. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    34. Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2018. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 883-896.
    35. Ghafghazi, S. & Sowlati, T. & Sokhansanj, S. & Melin, S., 2010. "A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1134-1140, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahlberg, Bernhard & Frank-Stocker, Andrea & Koller, Wolfgang & Ramerstorfer, Christian, 2023. "Cost efficiency of renewable district heating systems: the case of Austria," MPRA Paper 118595, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hendrik & Yin Yuan & Akhmad Fauzi & Widiatmaka & Dyah Tjahyandari Suryaningtyas & Florentinus Firdiyono & Yang Yao, 2022. "Determination of the Red Mud Industrial Cluster Sites in Indonesia Based on Sustainability Aspect and Waste Management Analysis through PROMETHEE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Volkova, Anna & Krupenski, Igor & Kovtunova, Natalja & Hlebnikov, Aleksandr & Mašatin, Vladislav & Ledvanov, Aleksandr, 2023. "Converting Tallinn's historic centre's (Old Town) heating system to a district heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Ziemele, Jelena & Volkova, Anna & Latõšov, Eduard & Murauskaitė, Lina & Džiuvė, Vytautas, 2023. "Comparative assessment of heat recovery from treated wastewater in the district heating systems of the three capitals of the Baltic countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Donaduzzi Rigo & Graciele Rediske & Carmen Brum Rosa & Natália Gava Gastaldo & Leandro Michels & Alvaro Luiz Neuenfeldt Júnior & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, 2020. "Renewable Energy Problems: Exploring the Methods to Support the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Lund, Peter D. & Zamanisabzi, Hamed, 2020. "Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Na Li & Rudi Hakvoort & Zofia Lukszo, 2021. "Cost Allocation in Integrated Community Energy Systems—Social Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    5. Wang, Yang & Zhang, Shanhong & Chow, David & Kuckelkorn, Jens M., 2021. "Evaluation and optimization of district energy network performance: Present and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    7. Nasrollahi, Sadaf & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Jahangir, Mohammad-Hossein & Aryaee, Sara, 2023. "Selecting suitable wave energy technology for sustainable development, an MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 756-772.
    8. Golmohamadi, Hessam & Larsen, Kim Guldstrand & Jensen, Peter Gjøl & Hasrat, Imran Riaz, 2022. "Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    10. Aleksandar Ivančić & Joaquim Romaní & Jaume Salom & Maria-Victoria Cambronero, 2021. "Performance Assessment of District Energy Systems with Common Elements for Heating and Cooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Kılkış, Şiir, 2021. "Transition towards urban system integration and benchmarking of an urban area to accelerate mitigation towards net-zero targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. Sola, Antonio Vanderley Herrero & Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda & Kovaleski, João Luiz, 2011. "A model for improving energy efficiency in industrial motor system using multicriteria analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3645-3654, June.
    13. Riley, David & Schaafsma, Marije & Marin-Moreno, Héctor & Minshull, Tim A., 2020. "A social, environmental and economic evaluation protocol for potential gas hydrate exploitation projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    14. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Daim, Tugrul & Kunt, Meltem & Altay, Ayca & Suharto, Yulianto, 2017. "Scenarios for regional waste management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1323-1335.
    15. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "A novel version of the TODIM method based on the exponential model of prospect theory: The ExpTODIM method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1042-1055.
    16. Hering, Dominik & Faller, Michael R. & Xhonneux, André & Müller, Dirk, 2022. "Operational optimization of a 4th generation district heating network with mixed integer quadratically constrained programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    17. Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Werner, Sven & Dyrelund, Anders & Lund, Henrik & Arabkoohsar, Ahmad & Sorknæs, Peter & Gudmundsson, Oddgeir & Thorsen, Jan Eric & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2022. "The four generations of district cooling - A categorization of the development in district cooling from origin to future prospect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    18. Gao, Datong & Zhao, Bin & Kwan, Trevor Hocksun & Hao, Yong & Pei, Gang, 2022. "The spatial and temporal mismatch phenomenon in solar space heating applications: status and solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    19. Wirtz, Marco, 2023. "nPro: A web-based planning tool for designing district energy systems and thermal networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Michael O. Ukoba & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Mohammed Alghassab & Henry I. Njoku & Muhammad Imran & Zafar A. Khan, 2020. "Composite Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2411-:d:779281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.