IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7268-d932747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and Predicting the In-Ground Temperature Profile for Geothermal Energy Systems in the Desert of Arid Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany

    (Department of Mechanical Power Engineering, Faculty of Energy Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 8510, Egypt)

  • Ibrahim M. Al-Helal

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah Alsadon

    (Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah Ibrahim

    (Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Shady

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Instead of fossil fuels, clean renewable energy resources are being used to meet space heating and cooling needs, to reduce global warming and air pollution worldwide. In the desert of the Arabian Peninsula, extensive solar irradiance and drastic variations in air temperatures (daily and/or seasonally) are common; thus, geothermal energy resources are a promising solution that is nearly independent of weather fluctuations. Due to a lack of information about in-ground temperature profiles in these regions, the use of geothermal energy resources for domestic applications is very limited. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the in-ground temperature ( T g ) up to 3.5 m in depth for one year. Due to the difficulty of digging in the ground (i.e., gravelly sand; rocky, dry soil), numerical equations were adopted and used to simulate the in-ground temperature ( T g ) for a depth > 3 m. These equations were validated by comparing the measured and simulated values of T g for depths ≤ 3 m under extreme weather conditions. The validation yielded a mean absolute error ( E MA ) of ≤ 1.2 °C and a root mean square error ( E RMS ) of ≤ 1.42 °C. The measurements showed that at 3 m depth, the in-ground temperature was 32 °C in summer and 29 °C in winter. The simulation showed that values of T g increased with depth in winter and decreased in summer and became constant as 30 °C at 13 m depth throughout the year (i.e., the undisturbed ground temperature (UGT)). This temperature would provide considerable heating and cooling capacity if an earth-to-air heat exchanger were implemented in arid regions where ambient temperatures exceed 47 °C on summer days and drop below 10 °C on winter nights. The theoretical prediction of T g using the proposed equations is a useful tool for designers who use geothermal effects for indoor space cooling and heating in the desert of arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany & Ibrahim M. Al-Helal & Abdullah Alsadon & Abdullah Ibrahim & Mohamed Shady, 2022. "Measuring and Predicting the In-Ground Temperature Profile for Geothermal Energy Systems in the Desert of Arid Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7268-:d:932747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachana Vidhi, 2018. "A Review of Underground Soil and Night Sky as Passive Heat Sink: Design Configurations and Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Alberto Carotenuto & Francesca Ceglia & Elisa Marrasso & Maurizio Sasso & Laura Vanoli, 2021. "Exergoeconomic Optimization of Polymeric Heat Exchangers for Geothermal Direct Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Tiwari, G.N. & Akhtar, M.A. & Shukla, Ashish & Emran Khan, M., 2006. "Annual thermal performance of greenhouse with an earth–air heat exchanger: An experimental validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 2432-2446.
    4. Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany & Pietro Picuno & Ibrahim Al-Helal & Abdullah Alsadon & Abdullah Ibrahim & Mohamed Shady, 2015. "Radiometric Characterization, Solar and Thermal Radiation in a Greenhouse as Affected by Shading Configuration in an Arid Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Fahad Alkoaik & Abdulelah Al-Faraj & Ibrahim Al-Helal & Ronnel Fulleros & Mansour Ibrahim & Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghany, 2019. "Toward Sustainability in Rural Areas: Composting Palm Tree Residues in Rotating Bioreactors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Maurizio Sasso & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Modelling of Polymeric Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers for Low-Medium Temperature Geothermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodan Zhang & Jian Lv & Jianming Xie & Jihua Yu & Jing Zhang & Chaonan Tang & Jing Li & Zhixue He & Cheng Wang, 2020. "Solar Radiation Allocation and Spatial Distribution in Chinese Solar Greenhouses: Model Development and Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Barkat Rabbi & Zhong-Hua Chen & Subbu Sethuvenkatraman, 2019. "Protected Cropping in Warm Climates: A Review of Humidity Control and Cooling Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Xinpeng Diao & Quanshuai Sun & Jing Yang & Kan Wu & Xin Lu, 2022. "A Novel Deformation Extraction Approach for Sub-Band InSAR and Its Application in Large-Scale Surface Mining Subsidence Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Hegazy, Anwar & Farid, Mohammed & Subiantoro, Alison & Norris, Stuart, 2022. "Sustainable cooling strategies to minimize water consumption in a greenhouse in a hot arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Li, Zhi & Yano, Akira & Yoshioka, Hidekazu, 2020. "Feasibility study of a blind-type photovoltaic roof-shade system designed for simultaneous production of crops and electricity in a greenhouse," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Zhi Li & Akira Yano & Marco Cossu & Hidekazu Yoshioka & Ichiro Kita & Yasuomi Ibaraki, 2018. "Electrical Energy Producing Greenhouse Shading System with a Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Blind Based on Micro-Spherical Solar Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Simona Moretti & Alvaro Marucci, 2019. "A Photovoltaic Greenhouse with Variable Shading for the Optimization of Agricultural and Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Achour, Yasmine & Ouammi, Ahmed & Zejli, Driss, 2021. "Technological progresses in modern sustainable greenhouses cultivation as the path towards precision agriculture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Yıldız, Ahmet & Ozgener, Onder & Ozgener, Leyla, 2012. "Energetic performance analysis of a solar photovoltaic cell (PV) assisted closed loop earth-to-air heat exchanger for solar greenhouse cooling: An experimental study for low energy architecture in Aeg," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 281-287.
    10. Hsu, Chien-Yeh & Huang, Po-Chun & Liang, Jyun-De & Chiang, Yuan-Ching & Chen, Sih-Li, 2020. "The in-situ experiment of earth-air heat exchanger for a cafeteria building in subtropical monsoon climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 741-753.
    11. Chiara Bersani & Ahmed Ouammi & Roberto Sacile & Enrico Zero, 2020. "Model Predictive Control of Smart Greenhouses as the Path towards Near Zero Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Gan, Guohui, 2017. "Dynamic thermal simulation of horizontal ground heat exchangers for renewable heating and ventilation of buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 361-371.
    13. Alejandro López-Martínez & Diego Luis Valera-Martínez & Francisco Domingo Molina-Aiz & María de los Ángeles Moreno-Teruel & Araceli Peña-Fernández & Karlos Emmanuel Espinoza-Ramos, 2019. "Analysis of the Effect of Concentrations of Four Whitening Products in Cover Transmissivity of Mediterranean Greenhouses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Artur Nemś & Magdalena Nemś & Klaudia Świder, 2018. "Analysis of the Possibilities of Using a Heat Pump for Greenhouse Heating in Polish Climatic Conditions—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Mihalakakou, Giouli & Souliotis, Manolis & Papadaki, Maria & Halkos, George & Paravantis, John & Makridis, Sofoklis & Papaefthimiou, Spiros, 2022. "Applications of earth-to-air heat exchangers: A holistic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Peretti, Clara & Zarrella, Angelo & De Carli, Michele & Zecchin, Roberto, 2013. "The design and environmental evaluation of earth-to-air heat exchangers (EAHE). A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 107-116.
    17. Ahmed Abdel-Ghany & Ibrahim Al-Helal & Fahad Alkoaik & Abdullah Alsadon & Mohamed Shady & Abdullah Ibrahim, 2019. "Predicting the Cooling Potential of Different Shading Methods for Greenhouses in Arid Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Jian Kuang & Shihua Qi & Xiangyun Hu, 2021. "New Insights into Crust and upper Mantle Structure in Guangdong Province, China and Its Geothermal Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Anhui He & Xiao Wu & Xinfeng Jiang & Reyimei Maimaitituxun & Ayesha Entemark & Hongjun Xu, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Different Cooling Methods on the Indoor Environment of Greenhouses Used for Lentinula Edodes during Summer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Tittelein, Pierre & Achard, Gilbert & Wurtz, Etienne, 2009. "Modelling earth-to-air heat exchanger behaviour with the convolutive response factors method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1683-1691, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7268-:d:932747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.