IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i17p6325-d901817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Gas Model on the Performance and Flow Field Prediction of a Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Hydraulic Turbine

Author

Listed:
  • Shuaihui Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Pei Ren

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Pengcheng Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Longgang Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Xiaobo Zheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

Abstract

A two-phase hydraulic turbine’s performance and flow field were predicted under different Inlet Gas Volume Fractions (IGVF) with incompressible and compressible models, respectively. The calculation equation of equivalent head, hydraulic efficiency, and flow loss considering the expanding work of compressible gas were deduced based on the energy conservation equations. Then, the incompressible and compressible results, including the output power and flow fields, are compared and analyzed. The compressible gas model’s equivalent head, output power, and flow loss are higher than the incompressible model, but the hydraulic efficiency is lower. As the IGVF increases, the gas gradually diffuses from the blade’s working surface to its suction surface. The gas–liquid separation happens at the runner outlet in the compressible results due to the gas expansion. The area of the low-pressure zone in the incompressible results increases with the IGVF. However, it decreases with the IGVF in the compressible results. As the gas expands in the blade passage, it takes up more flow area, causing the high liquid velocity in the same passage. The runner’s inlet gas distribution affects the liquid flow angle, causing the inlet shock and high TKE areas, especially in the blade passage near the volute tongue. The high TKE area in the compressible results is larger than the incompressible results because the inlet impact loss and the liquid velocity in the blade passage are higher. This paper provides a reference for selecting gas models in the numerical simulation of two-phase hydraulic turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuaihui Sun & Pei Ren & Pengcheng Guo & Longgang Sun & Xiaobo Zheng, 2022. "Influence of the Gas Model on the Performance and Flow Field Prediction of a Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Hydraulic Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6325-:d:901817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenwu Zhang & Zhiyi Yu & Muhammad Noaman Zahid & Yongjiang Li, 2018. "Study of the Gas Distribution in a Multiphase Rotodynamic Pump Based on Interphase Force Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Kramer, M. & Terheiden, K. & Wieprecht, S., 2018. "Pumps as turbines for efficient energy recovery in water supply networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 17-25.
    3. Fan Zhang & Lufeng Zhu & Ke Chen & Weicheng Yan & Desmond Appiah & Bo Hu, 2020. "Numerical Simulation of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Characteristics of Centrifugal Pump Based on the CFD–PBM," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Sina Yan & Shuaihui Sun & Xingqi Luo & Senlin Chen & Chenhao Li & Jianjun Feng, 2020. "Numerical Investigation on Bubble Distribution of a Multistage Centrifugal Pump Based on a Population Balance Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elgammi, Moutaz & Hamad, Abduljawad Ashour, 2022. "A feasibility study of operating a low static pressure head micro pelton turbine based on water hammer phenomenon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Martin Polák, 2019. "The Influence of Changing Hydropower Potential on Performance Parameters of Pumps in Turbine Mode," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Rossi, Mosè & Nigro, Alessandra & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2019. "Experimental and numerical assessment of a methodology for performance prediction of Pumps-as-Turbines (PaTs) operating in off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 555-566.
    4. Renzi, Massimiliano & Nigro, Alessandra & Rossi, Mosè, 2020. "A methodology to forecast the main non-dimensional performance parameters of pumps-as-turbines (PaTs) operating at Best Efficiency Point (BEP)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 16-25.
    5. Venturini, Mauro & Manservigi, Lucrezia & Alvisi, Stefano & Simani, Silvio, 2018. "Development of a physics-based model to predict the performance of pumps as turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 343-354.
    6. Liu, Ming & Tan, Lei & Cao, Shuliang, 2019. "Dynamic mode decomposition of gas-liquid flow in a rotodynamic multiphase pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1159-1175.
    7. Abdulbasit Nasir & Edessa Dribssa & Misrak Girma & Habtamu Bayera Madessa, 2023. "Selection and Performance Prediction of a Pump as a Turbine for Power Generation Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Fan Zhang & Lufeng Zhu & Ke Chen & Weicheng Yan & Desmond Appiah & Bo Hu, 2020. "Numerical Simulation of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Characteristics of Centrifugal Pump Based on the CFD–PBM," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Moazeni, Faegheh & Khazaei, Javad, 2021. "Optimal energy management of water-energy networks via optimal placement of pumps-as-turbines and demand response through water storage tanks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Delgado, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Covas, D.I.C. & Avellan, F., 2019. "Variable speed operation of centrifugal pumps running as turbines. Experimental investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 437-450.
    11. Krishna, V.B Murali & Sandeep, V. & Murthy, S.S. & Yadlapati, Kishore, 2022. "Experimental investigation on performance comparison of self excited induction generator and permanent magnet synchronous generator for small scale renewable energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 431-441.
    12. Štefan, David & Rossi, Mosè & Hudec, Martin & Rudolf, Pavel & Nigro, Alessandra & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2020. "Study of the internal flow field in a pump-as-turbine (PaT): Numerical investigation, overall performance prediction model and velocity vector analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 158-172.
    13. Roberts, A. & Thomas, B. & Sewell, P. & Hoare, E., 2019. "Generating renewable power from water hammer pressure surges," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1392-1399.
    14. Martin Polák, 2021. "Innovation of Pump as Turbine According to Calculation Model for Francis Turbine Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Stefanizzi, Michele & Capurso, Tommaso & Balacco, Gabriella & Binetti, Mario & Camporeale, Sergio Mario & Torresi, Marco, 2020. "Selection, control and techno-economic feasibility of Pumps as Turbines in Water Distribution Networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1292-1306.
    16. Boštjan Zajec & Leon Cizelj & Boštjan Končar, 2022. "Experimental Analysis of Flow Boiling in Horizontal Annulus—The Effect of Heat Flux on Bubble Size Distributions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Qing Guo & Kai Luo & Daijin Li & Chuang Huang & Kan Qin, 2021. "Effect of Operating Conditions on the Performance of Gas–Liquid Mixture Roots Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Zhang, Wenwu & Xie, Xing & Zhu, Baoshan & Ma, Zhe, 2021. "Analysis of phase interaction and gas holdup in a multistage multiphase rotodynamic pump based on a modified Euler two-fluid model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1496-1507.
    19. Huixiang Chen & Kan Kan & Haolan Wang & Maxime Binama & Yuan Zheng & Hui Xu, 2021. "Development and Numerical Performance Analysis of a Micro Turbine in a Tap-Water Pipeline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Liu, Ming & Tan, Lei & Cao, Shuliang, 2020. "Method of dynamic mode decomposition and reconstruction with application to a three-stage multiphase pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6325-:d:901817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.