IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i17p6136-d896069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for Optimized Analysis of Waste Bioenergy Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Eliana M. A. Guerreiro

    (Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PPGEP), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire, 330, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

  • Maicon Silva

    (Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Graduate Program in Urban Environmental Sustainbility (PPGSAU), Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Deputado Heitor Alencar Furtado, 500, Curitiba 81280-340, Brazil)

  • Marcio Guerreiro

    (Computational Intelligence and Advanced Control Laboratory (LICON), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PPGEP), Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire, 330, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

  • Taís Carvalho

    (Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PPGEP), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire, 330, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

  • Attilio Converti

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Pole of Chemical Engineering, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Hugo Valadares Siqueira

    (Computational Intelligence and Advanced Control Laboratory (LICON), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PPGEP), Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire, 330, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

  • Cassiano Moro Piekarski

    (Sustainable Production Systems Laboratory (LESP), Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PPGEP), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Parana (UTFPR), Rua Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire, 330, Ponta Grossa 84017-220, Brazil)

Abstract

Over the years, cities have undergone transformations that, invariably, overload and even compromise the functioning of an energy matrix dependent on increasingly scarce resources. The high demand for energy has challenged stakeholders to invest in more sustainable alternatives, such as bioenergy, which, in addition, helps to reduce the pressure for finite resources, enable the energy recovery of waste and contribute to the mitigation of carbon emissions. For these improvements to be successful, stakeholders need specific technological strategies, requiring tools, methods and solutions that support the decision-making process. In this perspective, the current work aimed to develop a framework optimizing the evaluation of waste bioenergy projects through the application of algorithms. Therefore, a literature review was carried out to select the algorithms and identify the sectors/areas and stages in which they are applied. These algorithms were then grouped into two sequential phases. The first targeted the evaluation of region, based on the type and supply of biomass, while the second sought to optimize aspects related to infrastructure and logistics. Both phases were concluded with the application of multi-criteria methods, thus, identifying the areas/regions with the greatest potential for implementing bioenergy projects. In general, it was observed that there are different algorithms and multi-criteria analysis methods that can be suitable in bioenergy projects. They were used to identify and select the regions with the greatest potential for bioenergy plant implementation, focusing on the type, quantity and perpetuity of biomass supply, to assess the operational efficiency of machines, equipment, processes and to optimize the logistics chain, especially the collection and transport of biomass. Thus, the joint work between the use of algorithms and multi-criteria decision methods provides greater assertiveness in choices, helping to identify the most viable projects and mitigating risks and uncertainties for decision-makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliana M. A. Guerreiro & Maicon Silva & Marcio Guerreiro & Taís Carvalho & Attilio Converti & Hugo Valadares Siqueira & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2022. "Framework for Optimized Analysis of Waste Bioenergy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6136-:d:896069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Chien-Wei & Fan, Yueyue, 2012. "Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 150-164.
    2. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A mixed biomass-based energy supply chain for enhancing economic and environmental sustainability benefits: A multi-criteria decision making framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1088-1101.
    3. Zamar, David S. & Gopaluni, Bhushan & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2017. "Optimization of sawmill residues collection for bioenergy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 487-495.
    4. Scott, James A. & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K., 2012. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 146-156.
    5. Regina Negri Pagani & João Luiz Kovaleski & Luis Mauricio Resende, 2015. "Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2109-2135, December.
    6. Shen, Yafei & Zhao, Peitao & Shao, Qinfu & Takahashi, Fumitake & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "In situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char/ash supported nickel–iron catalysts for biomass pyrolytic gasification combined with the mixing-simulation in fluidized-bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 808-819.
    7. Krystel K. Castillo-Villar, 2014. "Metaheuristic Algorithms Applied to Bioenergy Supply Chain Problems: Theory, Review, Challenges, and Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-33, November.
    8. Zhao, Ning & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Dairy waste-to-energy incentive policy design using Stackelberg-game-based modeling and optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    9. Omid Abrishambaf & Pedro Faria & Zita Vale & Juan M. Corchado, 2019. "Energy Scheduling Using Decision Trees and Emulation: Agriculture Irrigation with Run-of-the-River Hydroelectricity and a PV Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    11. Kaundinya, Deepak Paramashivan & Balachandra, P. & Ravindranath, N.H. & Ashok, Veilumuthu, 2013. "A GIS (geographical information system)-based spatial data mining approach for optimal location and capacity planning of distributed biomass power generation facilities: A case study of Tumkur distric," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 77-88.
    12. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Wu, Bingqing & Paudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Modeling and optimization of a supply chain of renewable biomass and biogas: Processing plant location," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 343-355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    2. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M. & García-Cascales, M.S. & Lamata, M.T., 2014. "Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farms development in Region of Murcia, Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 311-324.
    3. Shabani, Nazanin & Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2013. "Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 299-311.
    4. Saghaei, Mahsa & Ghaderi, Hadi & Soleimani, Hamed, 2020. "Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Petr Tučník & Vladimír Bureš, 2016. "Experimental Evaluation of Suitability of Selected Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Large-Scale Agent-Based Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Sara Al-Haidous & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2019. "Sustainable Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain Management: A Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Sandra Silva, 2023. "Optimization of the Residual Biomass Supply Chain: Process Characterization and Cost Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    9. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    13. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Regina Negri Pagani, 2019. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Influencing the Process of Innovation in Green Supply Chain Management: A Multicriteria Model Based on the DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    15. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    16. Martelli, Emanuele & Freschini, Marco & Zatti, Matteo, 2020. "Optimization of renewable energy subsidy and carbon tax for multi energy systems using bilevel programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    17. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Ling Gai & Ying Jin & Binyuan Zhang, 2022. "An integrated method for hybrid distribution with estimation of demand matching degree," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2782-2808, November.
    19. Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    20. Almendros, A.I. & Blázquez, G. & Ronda, A. & Martín-Lara, M.A. & Calero, M., 2017. "Study of the catalytic effect of nickel in the thermal decomposition of olive tree pruning via thermogravimetric analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 825-835.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6136-:d:896069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.