IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p6094-d894818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Data-Driven Models in the Prediction of Ship Performance (Speed—Power) in Actual Seas: A Comparative Study between Modern Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Kiriakos Alexiou

    (Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Efthimios G. Pariotis

    (Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Section, Hellenic Naval Academy, 18539 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Helen C. Leligou

    (Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Theodoros C. Zannis

    (Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Section, Hellenic Naval Academy, 18539 Piraeus, Greece)

Abstract

In the extremely competitive environment of shipping, minimizing shipping cost is the key factor for the survival and growth of shipping companies. However, stricter rules and regulations that aim at the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions published by the International Maritime Organization, force shipping companies to increase the operational efficiency of their fleet. The prediction of a ship speed in actual seas with a given power by its engine is the most important performance indicator and thus makes it the “holy grail” in pursuing better efficiency. Traditionally, tank model tests and semi-empirical formulas were the preferred solution for the aforementioned prediction and are still widely applied. However, currently, with the increased computational power that is widely available, novel and more sophisticated methods taking into consideration computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms are emerging. In this paper, we briefly present the different approaches in the prediction of a ship’s speed but focus on ML methods comparing a representative number of the latest data-driven models used in papers, to provide guidelines, discover trends and identify the challenges to be faced by researchers. From this comparison, we can distinguish that artificial neural networks (ANN), being used in 73.3% of the reviewed papers, dominate as the algorithm of choice. Researchers mostly rely on physical laws governing the phenomena in the crucial part of data preprocessing tasks. Lastly, most researchers rely on data acquisition systems installed at ships in order to achieve usable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiriakos Alexiou & Efthimios G. Pariotis & Helen C. Leligou & Theodoros C. Zannis, 2022. "Towards Data-Driven Models in the Prediction of Ship Performance (Speed—Power) in Actual Seas: A Comparative Study between Modern Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6094-:d:894818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahyar Jahaninasab & Ehsan Taheran & S. Alireza Zarabadi & Mohammadreza Aghaei & Ali Rajabpour, 2023. "A Novel Approach for Reducing Feature Space Dimensionality and Developing a Universal Machine Learning Model for Coated Tubes in Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Bin & Chen, Shuiyang & Haralambides, Hercules & Kuang, Haibo & Fan, Lidong, 2023. "Information spillovers between carbon emissions trading prices and shipping markets: A time-frequency analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Yang, Dong & Liao, Shiguan & Venus Lun, Y.H & Bai, Xiwen, 2023. "Towards sustainable port management: Data-driven global container ports turnover rate assessment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Nguyen, Son & Fu, Xiuju & Ogawa, Daichi & Zheng, Qin, 2023. "An application-oriented testing regime and multi-ship predictive modeling for vessel fuel consumption prediction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Wen Yi & Robyn Phipps & Hans Wang, 2020. "Sustainable Ship Loading Planning for Prefabricated Products in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Filom, Siyavash & Amiri, Amir M. & Razavi, Saiedeh, 2022. "Applications of machine learning methods in port operations – A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Yu, Jingjing & Tang, Guolei & Song, Xiangqun, 2022. "Collaboration of vessel speed optimization with berth allocation and quay crane assignment considering vessel service differentiation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Psaraftis, Harilaos N., 2021. "Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Shang, Gang & Xu, Liyun & Tian, Jinzhu & Cai, Dongwei & Xu, Zhun & Zhou, Zhuo, 2023. "A real-time green construction optimization strategy for engineering vessels considering fuel consumption and productivity: A case study on a cutter suction dredger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Philip Cammin & Jingjing Yu & Stefan Voß, 2023. "Tiered prediction models for port vessel emissions inventories," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 142-169, March.
    10. Ran Yan & Wen Yi & Shuaian Wang, 2022. "Predicting Maximum Work Duration for Construction Workers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Beullens, Patrick & Ge, Fangsheng & Hudson, Dominic, 2023. "The economic ship speed under time charter contract—A cash flow approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran, 2023. "Fundamental challenge and solution methods in prescriptive analytics for freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Tayfun Uyanık & Yunus Yalman & Özcan Kalenderli & Yasin Arslanoğlu & Yacine Terriche & Chun-Lien Su & Josep M. Guerrero, 2022. "Data-Driven Approach for Estimating Power and Fuel Consumption of Ship: A Case of Container Vessel," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Jan Monieta, 2022. "Method and a Device for Testing the Friction Force in Precision Pairs of Injection Apparatus of the Self-Ignition Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Wu, Lingxiao & Wang, Shuaian & Laporte, Gilbert, 2021. "The Robust Bulk Ship Routing Problem with Batched Cargo Selection," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 124-159.
    16. Tayfun Uyanık & Nur Najihah Abu Bakar & Özcan Kalenderli & Yasin Arslanoğlu & Josep M. Guerrero & Abderezak Lashab, 2023. "A Data-Driven Approach for Generator Load Prediction in Shipboard Microgrid: The Chemical Tanker Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Tan, Zhijia & Zeng, Xianyang & Shao, Shuai & Chen, Jihong & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Scrubber installation and green fuel for inland river ships with non-identical streamflow," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6094-:d:894818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.