IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5997-d891976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Residential Consumers’ Acceptance of a Utility-Scale Battery Energy Storage System in Malaysia: Technology Acceptance Model Theory from a Different Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Hisham Jaaffar

    (Institute of Energy Policy and Research (IEPRe), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nurshahirah Abd Majid

    (College of Graduate Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Bakhtiar Alrazi

    (College of Business Management and Accounting, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Bandar Muadzam Shah 26700, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Vigna K. Ramachandaramurty

    (Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nofri Yenita Dahlan

    (Solar Energy Research Institute (SRI), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

In a developing country such as Malaysia, studies of determinants which influence residential consumers of the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) are limited. This paucity of studies was the catalyst for this study and its aim to investigate the factors affecting acceptance by Malaysian residential consumers of BESS as it relates to the Technology Acceptance Model Theory. A sample of 331 residential consumers indicated that consumer attitudes, social norms and self-efficacy, or the perception of behavioral control, had a positive and significant relationship with the intention to use BESS. Additionally, trust was a factor that had a significant effect on the consumers’ perceptions of cost, benefits and anticipated effects. All these variables significantly affect consumer attitudes. These findings provide important insights into BESS and facilitate the development of policies and practices relating to BESS in developing countries such as Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Hisham Jaaffar & Nurshahirah Abd Majid & Bakhtiar Alrazi & Vigna K. Ramachandaramurty & Nofri Yenita Dahlan, 2022. "Determinants of Residential Consumers’ Acceptance of a Utility-Scale Battery Energy Storage System in Malaysia: Technology Acceptance Model Theory from a Different Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5997-:d:891976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koirala, Binod Prasad & van Oost, Ellen & van der Windt, Henny, 2018. "Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 570-585.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Sayed, Enas Taha & Abo-Khalil, Ahmed G. & Maghrabie, Hussein M. & Elsaid, Khaled & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Battery energy storage systems and SWOT (strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats) analysis of batteries in power transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    4. Emmerich, Philip & Hülemeier, Anna-Gesina & Jendryczko, David & Baumann, Manuel Johann & Weil, Marcel & Baur, Dorothee, 2020. "Public acceptance of emerging energy technologies in context of the German energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Salmi Mohd Isa & Maisarah Abd Hamid & Shaian Kiumarsi & Amar Hisham Jaaffar, 2021. "Integrating innovation and sustainability into tour operator business," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 458-474.
    6. Azlan Amran & Lim Chia Yon & Shaian Kiumarsi & Amar Hisham Jaaffar, 2021. "Intellectual human capital, corporate social innovation and sustainable development: a conceptual framework," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 75-99.
    7. Michael Siegrist & George Cvetkovich, 2000. "Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 713-720, October.
    8. Thomas, Gareth & Demski, Christina & Pidgeon, Nick, 2019. "Deliberating the social acceptability of energy storage in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Sidhu, Arjan S. & Pollitt, Michael G. & Anaya, Karim L., 2018. "A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 881-894.
    10. Lai, Chun Sing & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2021. "Economic and financial appraisal of novel large-scale energy storage technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Heymans, Catherine & Walker, Sean B. & Young, Steven B. & Fowler, Michael, 2014. "Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 22-30.
    12. Esther Hoffmann & Franziska Mohaupt, 2020. "Joint Storage: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Community Energy Storage in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Andrew Burlinson & Monica Giulietti, 2018. "Non-traditional business models for city-scale energy storage: evidence from UK case studies," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(2), pages 215-242, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pepa Ambrosio-Albalá & Catherine S. E. Bale & Andrew J. Pimm & Peter G. Taylor, 2020. "What Makes Decentralised Energy Storage Schemes Successful? An Assessment Incorporating Stakeholder Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ambrosio-Albala, P. & Upham, P. & Bale, C.S.E. & Taylor, P.G., 2020. "Exploring acceptance of decentralised energy storage at household and neighbourhood scales: A UK survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Sanneke Kloppenburg & Robin Smale & Nick Verkade, 2019. "Technologies of Engagement: How Battery Storage Technologies Shape Householder Participation in Energy Transitions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Dessi, F. & Ariccio, S. & Albers, T. & Alves, S. & Ludovico, N. & Bonaiuto, M., 2022. "Sustainable technology acceptability: Mapping technological, contextual, and social-psychological determinants of EU stakeholders’ biofuel acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown, 2014. "A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 294-308, February.
    6. Omid M. Ghoochani & Mansour Ghanian & Masoud Baradaran & Erfan Alimirzaei & Hossein Azadi, 2018. "Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-253, February.
    7. Moncada, J.A. & Tao, Z. & Valkering, P. & Meinke-Hubeny, F. & Delarue, E., 2021. "Influence of distribution tariff structures and peer effects on the adoption of distributed energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    8. Byoung Joon Kim & Seoyong Kim & Youngcheoul Kang & Sohee Kim, 2022. "Searching for the New Behavioral Model in Energy Transition Age: Analyzing the Forward and Reverse Causal Relationships between Belief, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Policy across Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Klaus, Geraldine & Ernst, Andreas & Oswald, Lisa, 2020. "Psychological factors influencing laypersons’ acceptance of climate engineering, climate change mitigation and business as usual scenarios," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Gährs, Swantje & Knoefel, Jan, 2020. "Stakeholder demands and regulatory framework for community energy storage with a focus on Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch, 2017. "The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2289-2304, December.
    13. Kim, Heetae & Park, Eunil & Kwon, Sang Jib & Ohm, Jay Y. & Chang, Hyun Joon, 2014. "An integrated adoption model of solar energy technologies in South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 523-531.
    14. Michele Graffeo & Lucia Savadori & Katya Tentori & Nicolao Bonini & Rino Rumiati, 2009. "Consumer decision in the context of a food hazard: the effect of commitment," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 8(1), pages 59-76, June.
    15. Chung, William & Yeung, Iris M.H., 2013. "Attitudes of Hong Kong residents toward the Daya Bay nuclear power plant," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1172-1186.
    16. Azwadi Ali, 2011. "The Mediating Role Of Attitudes In Trading Companies’ Shares," Journal of Global Business and Economics, Global Research Agency, vol. 3(1), pages 57-73, July.
    17. Azwadi Ali Author_Email: azwadi@umt.edu.my, 2011. "He Mediating Role Of Attitudes In Trading Companies’ Shares," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-222, Conference Master Resources.
    18. Bocker, Andreas & Nocella, Giuseppe, 2005. "Trust in Authorities Monitoring the Distribution of Genetically Modified Foods: Dimensionality, Measurement Issues, and Determinants," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24605, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Park, Eunil & Ohm, Jay Y., 2014. "Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: Effects of the Fukushima nuclear accident," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 198-211.
    20. Martins, Jason & Miles, John, 2021. "A techno-economic assessment of battery business models in the UK electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5997-:d:891976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.