IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5970-d891041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-Time Peak Valley Pricing Based Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of a Virtual Power Plant Considering Renewable Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Anubhav Kumar Pandey

    (Department of Electrical & Electronics, Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India)

  • Vinay Kumar Jadoun

    (Department of Electrical & Electronics, Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India)

  • Jayalakshmi N. Sabhahit

    (Department of Electrical & Electronics, Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India)

Abstract

In the era of aiming toward reaching a sustainable ecosystem, the primary focus is to curb the emissions generated by non-conventional resources. One way to achieve this goal is to find an alternative to traditional power plants (TPP) by integrating various distributed energy resources (DERs) via a Virtual Power Plant (VPP) in modern power systems. Apart from reducing emissions, a VPP enhances the monetary benefits to all its participants, including the DER owners, participants, and utility personnel. In this paper, the multi-objective optimal scheduling of the VPP problem considering multiple renewable energy resources has been solved using the multi-objective black widow optimization (MOBWO) algorithm. Renewable resources consist of solar PV modules, wind turbines, fuel cells, electric loads, heat-only units, and CHP units. The weighting factor method was adopted to handle the multi-objective optimal scheduling (MOOS) problem by simultaneously maximizing profit and minimizing emission while satisfying the related constraints. In this research, a peak valley power pricing strategy is introduced and the optimal scheduling of the VPP is attained by performing a multi-objective scheduling strategy (MOSS), which is day-ahead (on an hourly basis) and 15-min based (for a one-day profile), to observe the behavior of the anticipated system with a better constraint handling method. This algorithm is capable of dealing with a complex problem in a reduced computational time, ensuring the attainment of the considered objective functions. The numerical results obtained by the MOBWO algorithm after 100 independent trials were compared with the latest published work showing the effectiveness and suitability of the developed system.

Suggested Citation

  • Anubhav Kumar Pandey & Vinay Kumar Jadoun & Jayalakshmi N. Sabhahit, 2022. "Real-Time Peak Valley Pricing Based Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of a Virtual Power Plant Considering Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5970-:d:891041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niknam, Taher & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul, 2012. "An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming framework for multi-objective optimal micro-grid operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 455-470.
    2. Zamani, Ali Ghahgharaee & Zakariazadeh, Alireza & Jadid, Shahram, 2016. "Day-ahead resource scheduling of a renewable energy based virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 324-340.
    3. Reddy, S. Surender, 2017. "Optimal scheduling of thermal-wind-solar power system with storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1357-1368.
    4. Hadayeghparast, Shahrzad & SoltaniNejad Farsangi, Alireza & Shayanfar, Heidarali, 2019. "Day-ahead stochastic multi-objective economic/emission operational scheduling of a large scale virtual power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 630-646.
    5. Tascikaraoglu, A. & Erdinc, O. & Uzunoglu, M. & Karakas, A., 2014. "An adaptive load dispatching and forecasting strategy for a virtual power plant including renewable energy conversion units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 445-453.
    6. Biswas, M.A. Rafe & Robinson, Melvin D. & Fumo, Nelson, 2016. "Prediction of residential building energy consumption: A neural network approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 84-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nandini K. Krishnamurthy & Jayalakshmi N. Sabhahit & Vinay Kumar Jadoun & Dattatraya Narayan Gaonkar & Ashish Shrivastava & Vidya S. Rao & Ganesh Kudva, 2023. "Optimal Placement and Sizing of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in a Grid-Tied DC Microgrid Using Modified TLBO Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Mahmud, Khizir & Khan, Behram & Ravishankar, Jayashri & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Siano, Pierluigi, 2020. "An internet of energy framework with distributed energy resources, prosumers and small-scale virtual power plants: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Gholipour, Eskandar, 2017. "A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-363.
    4. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Wei, Congying & Xu, Jian & Liao, Siyang & Sun, Yuanzhang & Jiang, Yibo & Ke, Deping & Zhang, Zhen & Wang, Jing, 2018. "A bi-level scheduling model for virtual power plants with aggregated thermostatically controlled loads and renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 659-670.
    6. Ali Ahmadian & Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam & Ali Almansoori & Ali Elkamel, 2023. "Optimal Management of a Virtual Power Plant Consisting of Renewable Energy Resources and Electric Vehicles Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming and Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: A two-stage stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 932-950.
    8. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2018. "How to deal with uncertainties in electric power systems? A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 145-155.
    9. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Natalia Naval & Jose M. Yusta, 2020. "Water-Energy Management for Demand Charges and Energy Cost Optimization of a Pumping Stations System under a Renewable Virtual Power Plant Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    12. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    13. Nicu Bizon & Phatiphat Thounthong, 2020. "Energy Efficiency and Fuel Economy of a Fuel Cell/Renewable Energy Sources Hybrid Power System with the Load-Following Control of the Fueling Regulators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Liwei Ju & Peng Li & Qinliang Tan & Zhongfu Tan & GejiriFu De, 2018. "A CVaR-Robust Risk Aversion Scheduling Model for Virtual Power Plants Connected with Wind-Photovoltaic-Hydropower-Energy Storage Systems, Conventional Gas Turbines and Incentive-Based Demand Responses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, October.
    15. Hadayeghparast, Shahrzad & SoltaniNejad Farsangi, Alireza & Shayanfar, Heidarali, 2019. "Day-ahead stochastic multi-objective economic/emission operational scheduling of a large scale virtual power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 630-646.
    16. Zhou, Kaile & Peng, Ning & Yin, Hui & Hu, Rong, 2023. "Urban virtual power plant operation optimization with incentive-based demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    17. Nyong-Bassey, Bassey Etim & Giaouris, Damian & Patsios, Charalampos & Papadopoulou, Simira & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Walker, Sara & Voutetakis, Spyros & Seferlis, Panos & Gadoue, Shady, 2020. "Reinforcement learning based adaptive power pinch analysis for energy management of stand-alone hybrid energy storage systems considering uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Sampath Kumar Venkatachary & Jagdish Prasad & Ravi Samikannu & Annamalai Alagappan & Leo John Baptist & Raymon Antony Raj, 2020. "Macro Economics of Virtual Power Plant for Rural Areas of Botswana," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 196-207.
    19. Ahmed, R. & Sreeram, V. & Mishra, Y. & Arif, M.D., 2020. "A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting: Techniques and optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    20. Aruna Kanagaraj & Kumudini Devi Raguru Pandu, 2020. "Investigations of Various Market Models in a Deregulated Power Environment Using ACOPF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5970-:d:891041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.