IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5786-d884170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on Static Pressure Sedimentation for a Thick-Walled Bucket Foundation in Sand

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Hongjie Zheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jijian Lian

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

As an emerging foundation structure for offshore wind turbines, bucket foundations with superior bearing capacities and efficient construction procedures have attracted significant attention in China. Thick-walled bucket foundations with concrete skirts can effectively reduce the cost and prevent the buckling problem of steel skirts during construction, transportation, and installation. However, great challenges are encountered during the sinking process, and the accurate calculation of sinking resistance is a critical process. Static-pressure tests of thin-walled and thick-walled models in sand were performed to measure the penetration resistance and soil pressure at the sidewalls and ends. The horizontal-soil-pressure coefficients of different models were calculated, and the end and skin-friction coefficients in the cone-penetration test method are recommended. The drag-reduction effects of the anti-drag ring and pressure-pull-out loading method were examined, and the drag-reduction effect was evident for the bucket foundation. The drag-reduction effect of the pressure-pull-out loading method is mainly reflected in the end zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Zhao & Hongjie Zheng & Jijian Lian, 2022. "Experimental Study on Static Pressure Sedimentation for a Thick-Walled Bucket Foundation in Sand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5786-:d:884170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oh, Ki-Yong & Nam, Woochul & Ryu, Moo Sung & Kim, Ji-Young & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2018. "A review of foundations of offshore wind energy convertors: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 16-36.
    2. Jijian Lian & Qi Jiang & Xiaofeng Dong & Yue Zhao & Hao Zhao, 2019. "Dynamic Impedance of the Wide-Shallow Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine Using Coupled Finite–Infinite Element Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nam, Woochul & Oh, Ki-Yong & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2019. "Evolution of the dynamic response and its effects on the serviceability of offshore wind turbines with stochastic loads and soil degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 151-163.
    2. Meng, Debiao & Yang, Shiyuan & Jesus, Abílio M.P. de & Zhu, Shun-Peng, 2023. "A novel Kriging-model-assisted reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization strategy and its application in the offshore wind turbine tower," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 407-420.
    3. Yangchun Han & Jiulong Cheng & Qiang Cui & Qianyun Dong & Wanting Song, 2020. "Uplift Bearing Capacity of Cone-Cylinder Foundation for Transmission Line in Frozen Soil Regions, Using Reduced-Scale Model Tests and Numerical Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Jijian Lian & Yue Zhao & Chong Lian & Haijun Wang & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Huan Zhou & Junni Jiang, 2018. "Application of an Eddy Current-Tuned Mass Damper to Vibration Mitigation of Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Liu, Li & Jiang, Peng & Qian, Hongliang & Mu, Liwen & Lu, Xiaohua & Zhu, Jiahua, 2022. "CO2-negative biomass conversion: An economic route with co-production of green hydrogen and highly porous carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    7. Wiraditma Prananta & Ida Kubiszewski, 2021. "Assessment of Indonesia’s Future Renewable Energy Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Biofuel Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Christoffer Hallgren & Johan Arnqvist & Stefan Ivanell & Heiner Körnich & Ville Vakkari & Erik Sahlée, 2020. "Looking for an Offshore Low-Level Jet Champion among Recent Reanalyses: A Tight Race over the Baltic Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Neshat, Mehdi & Piras, Giuseppe & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2022. "Sites exploring prioritisation of offshore wind energy potential and mapping for wind farms installation: Iranian islands case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Xiao, Shaohui & Lin, Kun & Liu, Hongjun & Zhou, Annan, 2021. "Performance analysis of monopile-supported wind turbines subjected to wind and operation loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 842-858.
    11. Alexandre Mathern & Christoph von der Haar & Steffen Marx, 2021. "Concrete Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Xiaobin Qu & Yingxue Yao & Jianjun Du, 2021. "Conceptual Design and Hydrodynamic Performance of a Modular Hybrid Floating Foundation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Wen-Ko Hsu & Chung-Kee Yeh, 2021. "Offshore Wind Potential of West Central Taiwan: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Lin, Kun & Xiao, Shaohui & Zhou, Annan & Liu, Hongjun, 2020. "Experimental study on long-term performance of monopile-supported wind turbines (MWTs) in sand by using wind tunnel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1199-1214.
    15. Lijun Zhang & Kai Liu & Yufeng Wang & Zachary Bosire Omariba, 2018. "Ice Detection Model of Wind Turbine Blades Based on Random Forest Classifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Subbulakshmi, A. & Verma, Mohit & Keerthana, M. & Sasmal, Saptarshi & Harikrishna, P. & Kapuria, Santosh, 2022. "Recent advances in experimental and numerical methods for dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines — An integrated review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Yong Ma & Aiming Zhang & Lele Yang & Chao Hu & Yue Bai, 2019. "Investigation on Optimization Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Blades based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    18. C, O. Mauricio Hernandez & Shadman, Milad & Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Silva, Corbiniano & Estefen, Segen F. & La Rovere, Emilio, 2021. "Environmental impacts of offshore wind installation, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning activities: A case study of Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Elsner, Paul, 2019. "Continental-scale assessment of the African offshore wind energy potential: Spatial analysis of an under-appreciated renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 394-407.
    20. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Tong, H.W., 2023. "Mapping future offshore wind resources in the South China Sea under climate change by regional climate modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5786-:d:884170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.