IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4367-d839374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Technical Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy in Mexico: A Case Study in Tehuantepec Gulf

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Fernando Bernal-Camacho

    (Coordinación de Hidráulica, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Jassiel V. H. Fontes

    (Departamento de Engenharia Naval, Escola Superior de Tecnologia, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus 69050-020, Brazil)

  • Edgar Mendoza

    (Coordinación de Hidráulica, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

Abstract

The growing energy demand has increased the consumption of hydrocarbons in developing countries such as Mexico, which has contributed to accelerating global warming. Although Mexico has suitable offshore wind energy harvesting sites, technical assessments to identify technologies to be placed in specific locations are scarce. In Mexico, offshore wind resources are found in depths larger than 50 m. There, floating platforms are convenient for harnessing wind energy. This work presents a technical evaluation of offshore wind energy in one of the regions with a higher availability of wind resources on the Mexican coasts, the Tehuantepec Gulf, in the Pacific Ocean. First, a specific location is chosen to evaluate its maritime conditions and theoretical wind energy potential. Next, the performance of a floating offshore wind turbine platform has been investigated numerically using potential flow simulations. The motions of the platform were analyzed for different drafts when subjected to different environmental conditions in the evaluated region. These conditions include wave and wind scenarios with the highest probability of occurrence and the most extreme ones. From the evaluation of the platform dynamics in these scenarios, it was possible to identify the general working conditions of the platform. Results showed that the proposed FOWT could be suitable to be deployed in the region of interest for the most probable environmental conditions, presenting a possible energy production within 3–4 MW, approximately. However, motion stabilization should be required when subjected to extreme environmental conditions as the structure could significantly increase its surge and pitch motions. The simplified approach employed in this work can help perform the following steps in technical or practical resource assessments of wind energy in other places in Mexico or similar developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Fernando Bernal-Camacho & Jassiel V. H. Fontes & Edgar Mendoza, 2022. "A Technical Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy in Mexico: A Case Study in Tehuantepec Gulf," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4367-:d:839374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yichao & Li, Sunwei & Yi, Qian & Chen, Daoyi, 2016. "Developments in semi-submersible floating foundations supporting wind turbines: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 433-449.
    2. Elsner, Paul, 2019. "Continental-scale assessment of the African offshore wind energy potential: Spatial analysis of an under-appreciated renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 394-407.
    3. Jennifer C. Wilson & Mike Elliott & Nick D. Cutts & Lucas Mander & Vera Mendão & Rafael Perez-Dominguez & Anna Phelps, 2010. "Coastal and Offshore Wind Energy Generation: Is It Environmentally Benign?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-40, July.
    4. Zheng, Chong Wei & Li, Chong Yin & Pan, Jing & Liu, Ming Yang & Xia, Lin Lin, 2016. "An overview of global ocean wind energy resource evaluations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1240-1251.
    5. Hong, Lixuan & Möller, Bernd, 2011. "Offshore wind energy potential in China: Under technical, spatial and economic constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4482-4491.
    6. Oh, Ki-Yong & Kim, Ji-Young & Lee, Jae-Kyung & Ryu, Moo-Sung & Lee, Jun-Shin, 2012. "An assessment of wind energy potential at the demonstration offshore wind farm in Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 555-563.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Tao & Jingpeng Yue & Zhenlin Huang & Ranran An & Zou Li & Junfeng Liu, 2022. "A High-Gain DC Side Converter with a Ripple-Free Input Current for Offshore Wind Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Cong & Huang, Guohe (Gordon) & Cheng, Guanhui, 2021. "Offshore wind can power Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Jianxing Yu & Yiqin Fu & Yang Yu & Shibo Wu & Yuanda Wu & Minjie You & Shuai Guo & Mu Li, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Bohai Bay, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Pustina, L. & Lugni, C. & Bernardini, G. & Serafini, J. & Gennaretti, M., 2020. "Control of power generated by a floating offshore wind turbine perturbed by sea waves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Birgir Freyr Ragnarsson & Gudmundur V. Oddsson & Runar Unnthorsson & Birgir Hrafnkelsson, 2015. "Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis of a Wind Power Generation System at Búrfell in Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2014. "Study on offshore wind power potential and wind farm optimization in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 519-531.
    7. Salvação, N. & Guedes Soares, C., 2018. "Wind resource assessment offshore the Atlantic Iberian coast with the WRF model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 276-287.
    8. Poulsen, Thomas & Lema, Rasmus, 2017. "Is the supply chain ready for the green transformation? The case of offshore wind logistics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 758-771.
    9. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Nam, Woochul & Oh, Ki-Yong & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2019. "Evolution of the dynamic response and its effects on the serviceability of offshore wind turbines with stochastic loads and soil degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 151-163.
    12. Jin-Young Kim & Hyun-Goo Kim & Yong-Heack Kang, 2017. "Offshore Wind Speed Forecasting: The Correlation between Satellite-Observed Monthly Sea Surface Temperature and Wind Speed over the Seas around the Korean Peninsula," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Truong, Hoai Vu Anh & Dang, Tri Dung & Vo, Cong Phat & Ahn, Kyoung Kwan, 2022. "Active control strategies for system enhancement and load mitigation of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Davidson, Michael & Gunturu, Bhaskar & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang & Karplus, Valerie, 2013. "An Integrated Assessment of China’s Wind Energy Potential," Conference papers 332410, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Cai, Shang-Gui & Wang, Tengyuan & Wang, Zekun & Song, Juanjuan & Rong, Xiaomin & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Nie, Bingchuan & Li, Jiachun, 2018. "Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 391-399.
    17. Cheng-Dar Yue & Che-Chih Liu & Chien-Cheng Tu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2019. "Prediction of Power Generation by Offshore Wind Farms Using Multiple Data Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Kim, Choong-Ki & Jang, Seonju & Kim, Tae Yun, 2018. "Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 151-162.
    19. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2018. "Impact of government subsidies on economic feasibility of offshore wind system: Implications for Taiwan energy policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 336-345.
    20. Li, Jiangxia & Pan, Shunqi & Chen, Yongping & Yao, Yu & Xu, Conghao, 2022. "Assessment of combined wind and wave energy in the tropical cyclone affected region:An application in China seas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4367-:d:839374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.