IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8342-d699930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Feasibility Study of the Use of Hydrogen Produced from Surplus Wind Power for a Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Jung Pyo

    (Graduate School, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Seong-Won Moon

    (Graduate School, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Tong-Seop Kim

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

Because of the increasing challenges raised by climate change, power generation from renewable energy sources is steadily increasing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, especially CO 2 . However, this has escalated concerns about the instability of the power grid and surplus power generated because of the intermittent power output of renewable energy. To resolve these issues, this study investigates two technical options that integrate a power-to-gas (PtG) process using surplus wind power and the gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC). In the first option, hydrogen produced using a power-to-hydrogen (PtH) process is directly used as fuel for the GTCC. In the second, hydrogen from the PtH process is converted into synthetic natural gas by capturing carbon dioxide from the GTCC exhaust, which is used as fuel for the GTCC. An annual operational analysis of a 420-MW-class GTCC was conducted, which shows that the CO 2 emissions of the GTCC-PtH and GTCC-PtM plants could be reduced by 95.5% and 89.7%, respectively, in comparison to a conventional GTCC plant. An economic analysis was performed to evaluate the economic feasibility of the two plants using the projected cost data for the year 2030, which showed that the GTCC-PtH would be a more viable option.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Jung Pyo & Seong-Won Moon & Tong-Seop Kim, 2021. "A Comparative Feasibility Study of the Use of Hydrogen Produced from Surplus Wind Power for a Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8342-:d:699930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank Group, 2020. "Commodity Markets Outlook, April 2020," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 33624.
    2. Aneke, Mathew & Wang, Meihong, 2016. "Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 350-377.
    3. Zappa, William & van den Broek, Machteld, 2018. "Analysing the potential of integrating wind and solar power in Europe using spatial optimisation under various scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1192-1216.
    4. O'Shea, R. & Wall, D.M. & McDonagh, S. & Murphy, J.D., 2017. "The potential of power to gas to provide green gas utilising existing CO2 sources from industries, distilleries and wastewater treatment facilities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1090-1100.
    5. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    6. Parra, David & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Patel, Martin K., 2017. "An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 440-454.
    7. Seong Won Moon & Tong Seop Kim, 2020. "Advanced Gas Turbine Control Logic Using Black Box Models for Enhancing Operational Flexibility and Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yanbin & Sun, Yanting & Liu, Jiechao & Liu, Chang & Zhang, Feng, 2023. "A data driven robust optimization model for scheduling near-zero carbon emission power plant considering the wind power output uncertainties and electricity-carbon market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Felix Lippkau & David Franzmann & Thushara Addanki & Patrick Buchenberg & Heidi Heinrichs & Philipp Kuhn & Thomas Hamacher & Markus Blesl, 2023. "Global Hydrogen and Synfuel Exchanges in an Emission-Free Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Ayşe Fidan Altun, 2022. "A Conceptual Design and Analysis of a Novel Trigeneration System Consisting of a Gas Turbine Power Cycle with Intercooling, Ammonia–Water Absorption Refrigeration, and Hot Water Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Leisen, Robin & Radek, Julian & Weber, Christoph, 2024. "Modeling combined-cycle power plants in a detailed electricity market model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    5. Yanbin Li & Yanting Sun & Yulin Kang & Feng Zhang & Junjie Zhang, 2023. "An Optimal Site Selection Framework for Near-Zero Carbon Emission Power Plants Based on Multiple Stakeholders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Gontzal Lopez-Ruiz & Joseba Castresana-Larrauri & Jesús María Blanco-Ilzarbe, 2022. "Thermodynamic Analysis of a Regenerative Brayton Cycle Using H 2 , CH 4 and H 2 /CH 4 Blends as Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eveloy, Valerie & Gebreegziabher, Tesfaldet, 2019. "Excess electricity and power-to-gas storage potential in the future renewable-based power generation sector in the United Arab Emirates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 426-450.
    2. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    3. Gutiérrez-Martín, F. & Rodríguez-Antón, L.M. & Legrand, M., 2020. "Renewable power-to-gas by direct catalytic methanation of biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 948-959.
    4. Inkeri, Eero & Tynjälä, Tero & Karjunen, Hannu, 2021. "Significance of methanation reactor dynamics on the annual efficiency of power-to-gas -system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1113-1126.
    5. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    6. Bassano, Claudia & Deiana, Paolo & Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2020. "Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Oliver Gretzschel & Michael Schäfer & Heidrun Steinmetz & Erich Pick & Kim Kanitz & Stefan Krieger, 2020. "Advanced Wastewater Treatment to Eliminate Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater Treatment Plants in Combination with Energy-Efficient Electrolysis at WWTP Mainz," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    9. Tronchin, Lamberto & Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto, 2018. "Energy efficiency, demand side management and energy storage technologies – A critical analysis of possible paths of integration in the built environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-353.
    10. Liemberger, Werner & Halmschlager, Daniel & Miltner, Martin & Harasek, Michael, 2019. "Efficient extraction of hydrogen transported as co-stream in the natural gas grid – The importance of process design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 747-763.
    11. Koj, Jan Christian & Wulf, Christina & Zapp, Petra, 2019. "Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems - A review of technological and methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 865-879.
    12. Miguel J. Prieto & Juan Á. Martínez & Rogelio Peón & Lourdes Á. Barcia & Fernando Nuño, 2017. "On the Convenience of Using Simulation Models to Optimize the Control Strategy of Molten-Salt Heat Storage Systems in Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Qin, Chao & Saunders, Gordon & Loth, Eric, 2017. "Offshore wind energy storage concept for cost-of-rated-power savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 148-157.
    14. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    15. Ana Fernández-Guillamón & Guillermo Martínez-Lucas & Ángel Molina-García & Jose-Ignacio Sarasua, 2020. "Hybrid Wind–PV Frequency Control Strategy under Variable Weather Conditions in Isolated Power Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    17. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Bonucci, F. & Castellini, L. & Fratini, A. & Gallorini, F. & Zuccari, A., 2019. "Flywheel hybridization to improve battery life in energy storage systems coupled to RES plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 937-950.
    18. Hossein Lotfi & Mohammad Hasan Nikkhah, 2024. "Multi-Objective Profit-Based Unit Commitment with Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Units Using a Modified Optimization Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Masebinu, S.O. & Akinlabi, E.T. & Muzenda, E. & Aboyade, A.O., 2017. "Techno-economics and environmental analysis of energy storage for a student residence under a South African time-of-use tariff rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 413-429.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8342-:d:699930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.