IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i23p8151-d695518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Degree of Hybridization for Spark-Ignited Engines with Optional Variable Valve Timings

Author

Listed:
  • Andyn Omanovic

    (Automotive Powertrain Technologies Laboratory, Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
    Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Norbert Zsiga

    (Automotive Powertrain Technologies Laboratory, Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland)

  • Patrik Soltic

    (Automotive Powertrain Technologies Laboratory, Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland)

  • Christopher Onder

    (Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

The electric hybridization of vehicles with an internal combustion engine is an effective measure to reduce CO 2 emissions. However, the identification of the dimension and the sufficient complexity of the powertrain parts such as the engine, electric machine, and battery is not trivial. This paper investigates the influence of the technological advancement of an internal combustion engine and the sizing of all propulsion components on the optimal degree of hybridization and the corresponding fuel consumption reduction. Thus, a turbocharged and a naturally aspirated engine are both modeled with the additional option of either a fixed camshaft or a fully variable valve train. All models are based on data obtained from measurements on engine test benches. We apply dynamic programming to find the globally optimal operating strategy for the driving cycle chosen. Depending on the engine type, a reduction in fuel consumption by up to 32% is achieved with a degree of hybridization of 45%. Depending on the degree of hybridization, a fully variable valve train reduces the fuel consumption additionally by up to 9% and advances the optimal degree of hybridization to 50%. Furthermore, a sufficiently high degree of hybridization renders the gearbox obsolete, which permits simpler vehicle concepts to be derived. A degree of hybridization of 65% is found to be fuel optimal for a vehicle with a fixed transmission ratio. Its fuel economy diverges less than 4% from the optimal fuel economy of a hybrid electric vehicle equipped with a gearbox.

Suggested Citation

  • Andyn Omanovic & Norbert Zsiga & Patrik Soltic & Christopher Onder, 2021. "Optimal Degree of Hybridization for Spark-Ignited Engines with Optional Variable Valve Timings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8151-:d:695518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao, Xu & Lin, Zhenhong & Wang, Hewu & Ou, Shiqi & Ouyang, Minggao, 2020. "Range cost-effectiveness of plug-in electric vehicle for heterogeneous consumers: An expanded total ownership cost approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Song, Ziyou & Zhang, Xiaobin & Li, Jianqiu & Hofmann, Heath & Ouyang, Minggao & Du, Jiuyu, 2018. "Component sizing optimization of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with the hybrid energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 393-403.
    3. Pierpaolo Polverino & Ivan Arsie & Cesare Pianese, 2021. "Optimal Energy Management for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Dynamic Programming and Receding Horizon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.
    4. H. Christopher Frey & Xiaohui Zheng & Jiangchuan Hu, 2020. "Variability in Measured Real-World Operational Energy Use and Emission Rates of a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Gross, Eitan, 2016. "On the Bellman’s principle of optimality," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 217-221.
    6. Michelangelo Balmelli & Norbert Zsiga & Laura Merotto & Patrik Soltic, 2020. "Effect of the Intake Valve Lift and Closing Angle on Part Load Efficiency of a Spark Ignition Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Jonatan J. Gómez Vilchez & Austin Smyth & Luke Kelleher & Hui Lu & Charlene Rohr & Gillian Harrison & Christian Thiel, 2019. "Electric Car Purchase Price as a Factor Determining Consumers’ Choice and their Views on Incentives in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Enang, Wisdom & Bannister, Chris, 2017. "Modelling and control of hybrid electric vehicles (A comprehensive review)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1210-1239.
    9. Xixue Liu & Datong Qin & Shaoqian Wang, 2019. "Minimum Energy Management Strategy of Equivalent Fuel Consumption of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Based on Improved Global Optimization Equivalent Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Seiho Kim & Jaesik Lee & Chulung Lee, 2017. "Does Driving Range of Electric Vehicles Influence Electric Vehicle Adoption?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Andyn Omanovic & Norbert Zsiga & Patrik Soltic & Christopher Onder, 2021. "Increased Internal Combustion Engine Efficiency with Optimized Valve Timings in Extended Stroke Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Anselma, Pier Giuseppe & Biswas, Atriya & Belingardi, Giovanni & Emadi, Ali, 2020. "Rapid assessment of the fuel economy capability of parallel and series-parallel hybrid electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    13. Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendron, Bernard & Joyce-Moniz, Martim, 2020. "Increasing electric vehicle adoption through the optimal deployment of fast-charging stations for local and long-distance travel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 263-278.
    14. Zhuang, Weichao & Li (Eben), Shengbo & Zhang, Xiaowu & Kum, Dongsuk & Song, Ziyou & Yin, Guodong & Ju, Fei, 2020. "A survey of powertrain configuration studies on hybrid electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Fengqi Zhang & Lihua Wang & Serdar Coskun & Hui Pang & Yahui Cui & Junqiang Xi, 2020. "Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Review, Classification, Comparison, and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Kiyoung Kim & Namdoo Kim & Jongryeol Jeong & Sunghwan Min & Horim Yang & Ram Vijayagopal & Aymeric Rousseau & Suk Won Cha, 2021. "A Component-Sizing Methodology for a Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using an Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef Amry & Elhoussin Elbouchikhi & Franck Le Gall & Mounir Ghogho & Soumia El Hani, 2022. "Electric Vehicle Traction Drives and Charging Station Power Electronics: Current Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Anselma, Pier Giuseppe, 2022. "Computationally efficient evaluation of fuel and electrical energy economy of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with smooth driving constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Fabrizio Donatantonio & Alessandro Ferrara & Pierpaolo Polverino & Ivan Arsie & Cesare Pianese, 2022. "Novel Approaches for Energy Management Strategies of Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Comparison with Conventional Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Peng, Hujun & Chen, Zhu & Li, Jianxiang & Deng, Kai & Dirkes, Steffen & Gottschalk, Jonas & Ünlübayir, Cem & Thul, Andreas & Löwenstein, Lars & Pischinger, Stefan & Hameyer, Kay, 2021. "Offline optimal energy management strategies considering high dynamics in batteries and constraints on fuel cell system power rate: From analytical derivation to validation on test bench," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    5. Balali, Yasaman & Stegen, Sascha, 2021. "Review of energy storage systems for vehicles based on technology, environmental impacts, and costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Vincenzo De Bellis & Marco Piras & Enrica Malfi, 2022. "Assessment of an Adaptive Efficient Thermal/Electric Skipping Control Strategy for the Management of a Parallel Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Tobias Frambach & Ralf Kleisch & Ralf Liedtke & Jochen Schwarzer & Egbert Figgemeier, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment and Classification of 48 V Plug-in Hybrids with Real-Driving Use Case Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Pier Giuseppe Anselma, 2022. "Dynamic Programming Based Rapid Energy Management of Hybrid Electric Vehicles with Constraints on Smooth Driving, Battery State-of-Charge and Battery State-of-Health," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Anselma, Pier Giuseppe & Kollmeyer, Phillip & Lempert, Jeremy & Zhao, Ziyu & Belingardi, Giovanni & Emadi, Ali, 2021. "Battery state-of-health sensitive energy management of hybrid electric vehicles: Lifetime prediction and ageing experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    10. Serrano, José Ramón & García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier & Martínez-Boggio, Santiago, 2021. "High efficiency two stroke opposed piston engine for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle applications: Evaluation under homologation and real driving conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    11. Anselma, Pier Giuseppe, 2022. "Electrified powertrain sizing for vehicle fleets of car makers considering total ownership costs and CO2 emission legislation scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    12. Liu, Teng & Tan, Wenhao & Tang, Xiaolin & Zhang, Jinwei & Xing, Yang & Cao, Dongpu, 2021. "Driving conditions-driven energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicles: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Liu, Xinglong & Zhao, Fuquan & Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei, 2023. "Comparative analysis for different vehicle powertrains in terms of energy-saving potential and cost-effectiveness in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Fernandes, P. & Tomás, R. & Ferreira, E. & Bahmankhah, B. & Coelho, M.C., 2021. "Driving aggressiveness in hybrid electric vehicles: Assessing the impact of driving volatility on emission rates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Eckert, Jony Javorski & Silva, Fabrício L. & da Silva, Samuel Filgueira & Bueno, André Valente & de Oliveira, Mona Lisa Moura & Silva, Ludmila C.A., 2022. "Optimal design and power management control of hybrid biofuel–electric powertrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    16. Jacobus Nel & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2022. "Electric Vehicles Market and Policy Conditions: Identifying South African Policy ``Potholes"," Working Papers 202257, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    17. Sun, Xiaojun & Yao, Chong & Song, Enzhe & Yang, Qidong & Yang, Xuchang, 2022. "Optimal control of transient processes in marine hybrid propulsion systems: Modeling, optimization and performance enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    18. Zhu, Tao & Wills, Richard G.A. & Lot, Roberto & Ruan, Haijun & Jiang, Zhihao, 2021. "Adaptive energy management of a battery-supercapacitor energy storage system for electric vehicles based on flexible perception and neural network fitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    19. Xingyue Jiang & Jianjun Hu & Meixia Jia & Yong Zheng, 2018. "Parameter Matching and Instantaneous Power Allocation for the Hybrid Energy Storage System of Pure Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Tan, Kang Miao & Yong, Jia Ying & Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. & Mansor, Muhamad & Teh, Jiashen & Guerrero, Josep M., 2023. "Factors influencing global transportation electrification: Comparative analysis of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8151-:d:695518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.