IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6570-d654680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Types and Composition of Biomass in Biocoke Synthesis with the Coal Blending Method

Author

Listed:
  • Erlina Yustanti

    (Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Jl. Jend. Sudirman KM. 03 Cilegon, Banten 42435, Indonesia
    Centre of Excellence, Nanomaterial and Process Technology Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Jl. Jend. Sudirman KM. 03 Cilegon, Banten 42435, Indonesia)

  • Endarto Yudo Wardhono

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Jl. Jend. Sudirman KM. 03 Cilegon, Banten 42435, Indonesia)

  • Anggoro Tri Mursito

    (Research Center for Geotechnology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jl. Sangkuriang Kampus LIPI Bandung, Gd. 70, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

  • Ali Alhamidi

    (Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Jl. Jend. Sudirman KM. 03 Cilegon, Banten 42435, Indonesia)

Abstract

The steelmaking industry requires coke as a reducing agent, as an energy source, and for its ability to hold slag in a blast furnace. Coking coal as raw coke material is very limited. Studying the use of biomass as a mixture of coking coal in the synthesis of biocoke is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas coal emissions. This research focuses on biomass and heating temperature through the coal blending method to produce biocoke with optimal mechanical properties for the blast-furnace standard. The heating temperature of biomass to biochar was evaluated at 400, 500, and 600 °C. The blending of coking coal with biochar was in the compositions of 95:5, 85:15, and 75:25 wt.%. A compacting force of 20 MPa was employed to produce biocoke that was 50 mm in diameter and 27 mm thick using a hot cylinder dye. The green sample was heated at 1100 °C for 4 h, followed by quenching with a water medium, resulting in dense samples. Increasing heating temperature is generally directly proportional to an increase in fixed carbon and calorific value. Biocoke that meets several blast-furnace criteria is a coal mixture with coconut-shell charcoal of 85:15 wt.%. Carbonization at 500 °C, yielding fixed carbon, calorific value, and compressive strength, was achieved at 89.02 ± 0.11%; 29.681 ± 0.46 MJ/kg, and 6.53 ± 0.4 MPa, respectively. This product meets several criteria for blast-furnace applications, with CRI 29.8 and CSR 55.1.

Suggested Citation

  • Erlina Yustanti & Endarto Yudo Wardhono & Anggoro Tri Mursito & Ali Alhamidi, 2021. "Types and Composition of Biomass in Biocoke Synthesis with the Coal Blending Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6570-:d:654680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florentino-Madiedo, L. & Díaz-Faes, E. & Barriocanal, C., 2020. "Mechanical strength of bio-coke from briquettes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1717-1724.
    2. Promdee, Kittiphop & Chanvidhwatanakit, Jirawat & Satitkune, Somruedee & Boonmee, Chakkrich & Kawichai, Thitipong & Jarernprasert, Sittipong & Vitidsant, Tharapong, 2017. "Characterization of carbon materials and differences from activated carbon particle (ACP) and coal briquettes product (CBP) derived from coconut shell via rotary kiln," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1175-1186.
    3. Mousa, Elsayed & Wang, Chuan & Riesbeck, Johan & Larsson, Mikael, 2016. "Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1247-1266.
    4. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Esther Samerón-Manzano & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Biomass as Renewable Energy: Worldwide Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Xiaodan Liu & Xuping Feng & Lingxia Huang & Yong He, 2020. "Rapid Determination of Wood and Rice Husk Pellets’ Proximate Analysis and Heating Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin Sajdak & Roksana Muzyka & Grzegorz Gałko & Ewelina Ksepko & Monika Zajemska & Szymon Sobek & Dariusz Tercki, 2022. "Actual Trends in the Usability of Biochar as a High-Value Product of Biomass Obtained through Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Michał Rejdak & Małgorzata Wojtaszek-Kalaitzidi & Grzegorz Gałko & Bartosz Mertas & Tomasz Radko & Robert Baron & Michał Książek & Sten Yngve Larsen & Marcin Sajdak & Stavros Kalaitzidis, 2022. "A Study on Bio-Coke Production—The Influence of Bio-Components Addition on Coke-Making Blend Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    2. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2020. "Zapote Seed ( Pouteria mammosa L. ) Valorization for Thermal Energy Generation in Tropical Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Hamed, Mohammad M. & Mohammed, Ali & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2023. "Renewable energy adoption decisions in Jordan's industrial sector: Statistical analysis with unobserved heterogeneity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Dzido, Aleksandra & Krawczyk, Piotr & Wołowicz, Marcin & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2022. "Comparison of advanced air liquefaction systems in Liquid Air Energy Storage applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 727-739.
    8. Dang, Han & Xu, Runsheng & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Mingyong & Ye, Lian & Jia, Guoli, 2023. "Removal of oxygen-containing functional groups during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Experimental and DFT study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    10. Elsayed Mousa & Kurt Sjöblom, 2022. "Modeling and Optimization of Biochar Injection into Blast Furnace to Mitigate the Fossil CO 2 Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Jha, Gaurav & Soren, S., 2017. "Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 399-407.
    12. Wang, Xiaoling & Zhang, Tianyue & Nathwani, Jatin & Yang, Fangming & Shao, Qinglong, 2022. "Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons’ Paradox in China's iron & steel industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    14. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Assessing CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry: A nonparametric additive regression approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 325-337.
    15. Nunzia Esercizio & Mariamichela Lanzilli & Marco Vastano & Simone Landi & Zhaohui Xu & Carmela Gallo & Genoveffa Nuzzo & Emiliano Manzo & Angelo Fontana & Giuliana d’Ippolito, 2021. "Fermentation of Biodegradable Organic Waste by the Family Thermotogaceae," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Wentao Li & Mingfeng Wang & Fanbin Meng & Yifei Zhang & Bo Zhang, 2022. "A Review on the Effects of Pretreatment and Process Parameters on Properties of Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Montalvo-Navarrete, Juan M. & Lasso-Palacios, Ana P., 2024. "Energy access sustainability criteria definition for Colombian rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    18. Mika Pahnila & Aki Koskela & Petri Sulasalmi & Timo Fabritius, 2024. "Biocarbon Production Using Three-Stage Pyrolysis and Its Preliminary Suitability to the Iron and Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Maaz Hassan & Naveed Usman & Majid Hussain & Adnan Yousaf & Muhammad Aamad Khattak & Sidra Yousaf & Rankeshwarnath Sanjay Mishr & Sana Ahmad & Fariha Rehman & Ahmad Rashedi, 2023. "Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pellets Biofuel in Hazara Division, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    20. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6570-:d:654680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.