IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6401-d650939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Vapor Compression Chiller with Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle and Onsite Low-Grade Renewable Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Tauseef Nasir

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

  • Michael Chukwuemeka Ekwonu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

  • Javad Abolfazali Esfahani

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
    Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 91775-1111, Iran
    Center of Excellence on Modelling and Control Systems (CEMCS), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 91775-1111, Iran)

  • Kyung Chun Kim

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea)

Abstract

The present study offers a scheme to improve the performance of existing large-scale chillers. The system involves raising the temperature of the chiller’s cooling water stream using renewable energy sources by incorporating an organic Rankine cycle (ORC). The thermal analysis was conducted by raising the temperature of one-third of the approximately 200 ton chiller’s cooling water. The investigation was considered for ORC evaporator inlet temperature of 90~120 °C by the step of 10 °C. Various working fluids for the different ORC evaporator inlet temperatures were examined. Sensitivity analyses conducted on the degree of superheating, degree of subcooling, condenser saturation temperature, pinch point temperature differences of the ORC evaporator and condenser, and the mass flowrates of the heating and cooling streams were also reported. Genetic algorithm was employed to carry out the optimization. The best options for the ORC working fluid at the heating source ORC evaporator inlet temperatures of 90 °C was found to be DME, presenting an improvement of 48.72% in comparison with the rated coefficient of performance (COP) value of the VCC, with a renewable energy input requirement of 710 kW. At the heat source temperatures of 100 °C and 110 °C, butene, which presented an improvement in the COP equal to 48.76% and 68.85%, respectively, with the corresponding renewable energy requirements of 789.6 kW and 852 kW, was found to be the ideal candidate. Meanwhile, at the heat source inlet temperature of 120 °C, R1233zd (E), representing an improvement of 140.88% with the renewable energy input of around 1061 kW, was determined to be the most favorable ORC working fluid candidate.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Tauseef Nasir & Michael Chukwuemeka Ekwonu & Javad Abolfazali Esfahani & Kyung Chun Kim, 2021. "Integrated Vapor Compression Chiller with Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle and Onsite Low-Grade Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-41, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6401-:d:650939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Jinliang & Yu, Chao, 2014. "Critical temperature criterion for selection of working fluids for subcritical pressure Organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 719-733.
    2. Chua, K.J. & Chou, S.K. & Yang, W.M. & Yan, J., 2013. "Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning – A review of technologies and strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 87-104.
    3. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Lemort, Vincent & Meroni, Andrea, 2019. "Optimization of organic rankine cycle power systems for waste heat recovery on heavy-duty vehicles considering the performance, cost, mass and volume of the system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 229-241.
    4. Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Serrano, Susana & Barreneche, Camila & Petrichenko, Ksenia, 2015. "Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 85-98.
    5. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    6. Yang, Lixiang & Gong, Maoqiong & Guo, Hao & Dong, Xueqiang & Shen, Jun & Wu, Jianfeng, 2016. "Effects of critical and boiling temperatures on system performance and fluid selection indicator for low temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 830-844.
    7. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    8. Li, Canbing & Zhou, Jinju & Cao, Yijia & Zhong, Jin & Liu, Yu & Kang, Chongqing & Tan, Yi, 2014. "Interaction between urban microclimate and electric air-conditioning energy consumption during high temperature season," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 149-156.
    9. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    10. Cuce, Pinar Mert & Riffat, Saffa, 2015. "A comprehensive review of heat recovery systems for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 665-682.
    11. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    12. Mardiana-Idayu, A. & Riffat, S.B., 2012. "Review on heat recovery technologies for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1241-1255.
    13. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Lee, Dong-Hyun, 2016. "Volumetric expanders for low grade heat and waste heat recovery applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1090-1109.
    14. Rayegan, R. & Tao, Y.X., 2011. "A procedure to select working fluids for Solar Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 659-670.
    15. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Chukwuemeka Ekwonu & Mirae Kim & Binqi Chen & Muhammad Tauseef Nasir & Kyung Chun Kim, 2023. "Dynamic Simulation of Partial Load Operation of an Organic Rankine Cycle with Two Parallel Expanders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    2. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Su, Wen & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "A limiting efficiency of subcritical Organic Rankine cycle under the constraint of working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 458-466.
    4. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    5. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    6. Kermani, Maziar & Wallerand, Anna S. & Kantor, Ivan D. & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Generic superstructure synthesis of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in industrial processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1203-1225.
    7. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    8. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Su, Wen & Zhang, Ying & Zhao, Li & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "How to approach Carnot cycle via zeotropic working fluid: Research methodology and case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 576-586.
    9. Cao, Shuang & Xu, Jinliang & Miao, Zheng & Liu, Xiulong & Zhang, Ming & Xie, Xuewang & Li, Zhi & Zhao, Xiaoli & Tang, Guihua, 2019. "Steady and transient operation of an organic Rankine cycle power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 284-294.
    10. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    11. Tiwari, Deepak & Sherwani, Ahmad Faizan & Atheaya, Deepali & Kumar, Anil & Kumar, Nishant, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis of Organic Rankine cycle driven by reversed absorber hybrid photovoltaic thermal compound parabolic concentrator system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2118-2127.
    12. White, J.A. & Velasco, S., 2018. "Characterizing wet and dry fluids in temperature-entropy diagrams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 269-276.
    13. Freeman, James & Hellgardt, Klaus & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Working fluid selection and electrical performance optimisation of a domestic solar-ORC combined heat and power system for year-round operation in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 291-303.
    14. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Yue & Li, Shuangjun, 2019. "Performance analysis on novel thermodynamic cycle under the guidance of 3D construction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 478-492.
    15. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    16. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    17. Hou, Xiaochen & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhao, Tenglong & Xu, Yonghong & Tian, Yaming & Li, Jian & Zhang, Mengru & Wu, Yuting, 2019. "A comparison study and performance analysis of free piston expander-linear generator for organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 136-143.
    18. Vivian, Jacopo & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2015. "A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 727-746.
    19. Sarkar, Jahar & Bhattacharyya, Souvik, 2015. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1618-1625.
    20. Naseri, Ali & Norris, Stuart & Subiantoro, Alison, 2020. "Experimental investigation of a prototype semi-dry revolving vane expander: Design challenges and performance criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6401-:d:650939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.