IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p5081-d616755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

1,2—Propanediol Production from Glycerol Derived from Biodiesel’s Production: Technical and Economic Study

Author

Listed:
  • Juan B. Restrepo

    (Programa de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 # 8-49, Puerto Colombia C.P. 081001, Colombia)

  • Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad del Norte, Km 5 Vía Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla C.P. 080001, Colombia)

  • Antonio J. Bula

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Norte, Km 5 Vía Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla C.P. 080001, Colombia)

Abstract

For every nine tons of produced biodiesel, there is another ton of glycerol as a byproduct. Therefore, glycerol prices dropped significantly worldwide in recent years; the more significant biodiesel production is, the more glycerol exists as a byproduct. glycerol prices also impact the biodiesel manufacturing business, as it could be sold according to its refinement grade. The primary objective of this work was to evaluate the economic potential of the production of 1,2-propanediol derived from the biodiesel produced in Colombia. A plant to produce 1,2-propanediol via catalytic hydrogenation of glycerol in a trickle-bed reactor was designed. The plant comprised a reaction scheme where non-converted excess hydrogen was recycled, and the heat generated in the reactor was recovered. The reactor effluent was sent to a separation train where 98% m/m purity 1,2-propanediol was attained. Capital and operational costs were estimated from the process simulation. The net present value (NPV) and the modified internal return rate (MIRR) of the plant were used to assess the viability of the process. Their sensitivity to key input variables was evaluated to find the viability limits of the project. The economic potential of the 1,2-propanediol was calculated in USD 1.2/kg; for the base case, the NPV and the MIRR were USD 54.805 million and 22.56%, respectively, showing that, for moderate variations in products and raw material prices, the process is economically viable.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan B. Restrepo & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Antonio J. Bula, 2021. "1,2—Propanediol Production from Glycerol Derived from Biodiesel’s Production: Technical and Economic Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5081-:d:616755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quispe, César A.G. & Coronado, Christian J.R. & Carvalho Jr., João A., 2013. "Glycerol: Production, consumption, prices, characterization and new trends in combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 475-493.
    2. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A New Socio-economic Indicator to Measure the Performance of Bioeconomy Sectors in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Huisingh, Donald & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2021. "A circular economy model based on biomethane: What are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1660-1672.
    4. Reham Alhindawi & Yousef Abu Nahleh & Arun Kumar & Nirajan Shiwakoti, 2020. "Projection of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Road Transport Sector Based on Multivariate Regression and the Double Exponential Smoothing Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulin Chen & Songtao Liu & Xiaoyu Guo & Chaojie Jia & Xiaodong Huang & Yaodong Wang & Haozhong Huang, 2021. "Experimental Research on the Macroscopic and Microscopic Spray Characteristics of Diesel-PODE 3-4 Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Suresh K. Podapangi & Laura Mancini & Jie Xu & Sathy Harshavardhan Reddy & Aldo Di Carlo & Thomas M. Brown & Gloria Zanotti, 2023. "Green Anisole Solvent-Based Synthesis and Deposition of Phthalocyanine Dopant-Free Hole-Transport Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaurav Kumar Porichha & Yulin Hu & Kasanneni Tirumala Venkateswara Rao & Chunbao Charles Xu, 2021. "Crop Residue Management in India: Stubble Burning vs. Other Utilizations including Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Uchechukwu Stella Ezealigo & Blessing Nonye Ezealigo & Francis Kemausuor & Luke Ekem Kweku Achenie & Azikiwe Peter Onwualu, 2021. "Biomass Valorization to Bioenergy: Assessment of Biomass Residues’ Availability and Bioenergy Potential in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Seok-Jun Kim & Kwang-Cheol Oh & Sun-Yong Park & Young-Min Ju & La-Hoon Cho & Chung-Geon Lee & Min-Jun Kim & In-Seon Jeong & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Development and Validation of Mass Reduction Prediction Model and Analysis of Fuel Properties for Agro-Byproduct Torrefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Idiano D’Adamo & Piergiuseppe Morone & Donald Huisingh, 2021. "Bioenergy: A Sustainable Shift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-5, September.
    5. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Jaroslav Demko & Ján Machava, 2022. "Tree Resin, a Macroergic Source of Energy, a Possible Tool to Lower the Rise in Atmospheric CO 2 Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Nerijus Pedišius & Marius Praspaliauskas & Justinas Pedišius & Eugenija Farida Dzenajavičienė, 2021. "Analysis of Wood Chip Characteristics for Energy Production in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Yulin Chen & Songtao Liu & Xiaoyu Guo & Chaojie Jia & Xiaodong Huang & Yaodong Wang & Haozhong Huang, 2021. "Experimental Research on the Macroscopic and Microscopic Spray Characteristics of Diesel-PODE 3-4 Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Ahmed El Nemr & Marwa R. Elkatory & Safaa Ragab & Mohamed A. El-Nemr & Antonio Pantaleo, 2021. "Synthesis, Characterization, and Synergistic Effects of Modified Biochar in Combination with α-Fe 2 O 3 NPs on Biogas Production from Red Algae Pterocladia capillacea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Alfredo de Toro & Carina Gunnarsson & Nils Jonsson & Martin Sundberg, 2021. "Effects of Variable Weather Conditions on Baled Proportion of Varied Amounts of Harvestable Cereal Straw, Based on Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Aleksandra Petrovič & Sabina Vohl & Tjaša Cenčič Predikaka & Robert Bedoić & Marjana Simonič & Irena Ban & Lidija Čuček, 2021. "Pyrolysis of Solid Digestate from Sewage Sludge and Lignocellulosic Biomass: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis, Characterization of Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-34, August.
    12. Cornejo, A. & Barrio, I. & Campoy, M. & Lázaro, J. & Navarrete, B., 2017. "Oxygenated fuel additives from glycerol valorization. Main production pathways and effects on fuel properties and engine performance: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1400-1413.
    13. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Laura Virta & Riikka Räisänen, 2021. "Three Futures Scenarios of Policy Instruments for Sustainable Textile Production and Consumption as Portrayed in the Finnish News Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Fabiana Gatto & Sara Daniotti & Ilaria Re, 2021. "Driving Green Investments by Measuring Innovation Impacts. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Regional Bioeconomy Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Karin Meisterl & Sergio Sastre & Ignasi Puig-Ventosa & Rosaria Chifari & Laura Martínez Sánchez & Laurène Chochois & Gabriella Fiorentino & Amalia Zucaro, 2024. "Circular Bioeconomy in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: Policy Recommendations to Optimize Biowaste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Alexandra Gottinger & Luana Ladu & Rainer Quitzow, 2020. "Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Carvalho, Lara & Lundgren, Joakim & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wolf, Jens & Furusjö, Erik, 2018. "Methanol production via black liquor co-gasification with expanded raw material base – Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 570-584.
    20. Diego Teixeira Michalovicz & Patricia Bilotta, 2023. "Impact of a methane emission tax on circular economy scenarios in small wastewater treatment plants," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6575-6589, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5081-:d:616755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.