IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4635-d605472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Behavioral Energy Reduction Programs and Implementation of a Pilot Peer-to-Peer Led Behavioral Energy Reduction Program for a Low-Income Neighborhood

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Hoody

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA)

  • Anya Galli Robertson

    (Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA)

  • Sarah Richard

    (Clean Energy 4 All, Dayton, OH 45410, USA)

  • Claire Frankowski

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA
    Clean Energy 4 All, Dayton, OH 45410, USA)

  • Kevin Hallinan

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA
    Clean Energy 4 All, Dayton, OH 45410, USA)

  • Ciara Owens

    (Clean Energy 4 All, Dayton, OH 45410, USA)

  • Bob Pohl

    (Clean Energy 4 All, Dayton, OH 45410, USA)

Abstract

Utility-sponsored residential energy reduction programs have seen rapid advancement in the Unites States (US) over the past decade. These programs have particularly emphasized investments in energy efficient appliances and enveloped improvements. They have generally required co-investment by residents and, as a result, have mostly reached medium to high-income residents, with low income residences, in effect, supporting the utility investments through higher energy costs. Additionally, utility initiatives directed toward behavior-based energy reduction have reached residences with more advanced technologies, such as smart meters and smart Wi-Fi thermostats linked to phone apps, technologies generally not present in low-income residences. This research seeks to inform development of behavior-based energy reduction programs aimed specifically at low-income residences, premised on peer-to-peer energy education and support. It focuses on the design and implementation of a pilot program for 84 low-income residences in a medium-sized Midwestern US urban neighborhood, followed by measurement of realized energy savings and assessment of program outcomes through surveys of resident participants and interviews with program implementers. Only 21 residences provided an initial response to outreach. Of these, only 11 participated, and of these, energy savings were, in general, modest. However, evidence based upon other research and qualitative data obtained from program implementers and participants is presented in this study for the development of an improved design. The improved design emphasizes grassroots community co-design of the program and community engagement through program implementation to transform energy consumption and behaviors and find energy justice for vulnerable communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Hoody & Anya Galli Robertson & Sarah Richard & Claire Frankowski & Kevin Hallinan & Ciara Owens & Bob Pohl, 2021. "A Review of Behavioral Energy Reduction Programs and Implementation of a Pilot Peer-to-Peer Led Behavioral Energy Reduction Program for a Low-Income Neighborhood," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4635-:d:605472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Dworkin, Michael H., 2015. "Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 435-444.
    2. Dominic J. Bednar & Tony G. Reames, 2020. "Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 432-439, June.
    3. Abdulrahman Alanezi & Kevin P. Hallinan & Kefan Huang, 2021. "Automated Residential Energy Audits Using a Smart WiFi Thermostat-Enabled Data Mining Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Elisha R. Frederiks & Karen Stenner & Elizabeth V. Hobman, 2015. "The Socio-Demographic and Psychological Predictors of Residential Energy Consumption: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-37, January.
    5. Grilli, Gianluca & Curtis, John, 2021. "Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: A review of methods and approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Barbara Pawłowska, 2021. "Advancements in the Energy Sector and the Socioeconomic Development Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-5, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Beyond the triangle of renewable energy acceptance: The five dimensions of domestic hydrogen acceptance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    2. Keran Sarah Boyd & Christian Calvillo & Tanja Mueller & Xiaoyi Mu & Tong Zhu, 2023. "The Intersection of Fuel and Transport Policy in Scotland: A Review of Policy, Definitions and Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Aklin, Michaël, 2021. "Do high electricity bills undermine public support for renewables? Evidence from the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Ruth Shortall & Anna Mengolini & Flavia Gangale, 2022. "Citizen Engagement in EU Collective Action Energy Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Baik, Sosung & Hines, Jeffrey F. & Sim, Jaeung, 2023. "Racial disparities in the energy burden beyond socio-economic inequality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    6. Pereira, Diogo Santos & Marques, António Cardoso, 2023. "Are dynamic tariffs effective in reducing energy poverty? Empirical evidence from US households," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Chatzigeorgiou, I.M. & Andreou, G.T., 2021. "A systematic review on feedback research for residential energy behavior change through mobile and web interfaces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Juana Isabel Méndez & Adán Medina & Pedro Ponce & Therese Peffer & Alan Meier & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Evolving Gamified Smart Communities in Mexico to Save Energy in Communities through Intelligent Interfaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, July.
    9. Besagni, Giorgio & Premoli Vilà, Lidia & Borgarello, Marco & Trabucchi, Andrea & Merlo, Marco & Rodeschini, Jacopo & Finazzi, Francesco, 2021. "Electrification pathways of the Italian residential sector under socio-demographic constrains: Looking towards 2040," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Debnath, R. & Bardhan, R. & Darby, S. & Mohaddes, K. & Sunikka-Blank, M. & Coelho, A C V. & Isa, A., 2020. "A deep-narrative analysis of energy cultures in slum rehabilitation housing of Abuja, Mumbai and Rio de Janeiro for just policy design," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 20101, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Ye, Yuxiang & Koch, Steven F., 2021. "Measuring energy poverty in South Africa based on household required energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Fortier, Marie-Odile P. & Teron, Lemir & Reames, Tony G. & Munardy, Dynta Trishana & Sullivan, Breck M., 2019. "Introduction to evaluating energy justice across the life cycle: A social life cycle assessment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 211-219.
    14. Muhammad Sharif & Farzana Naheed Khan, 2023. "Unveiling the Implications of Energy Poverty for Educational Attainments in Pakistan: A Multidimensional Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 472-483, September.
    15. Heleen Dreyer & Nadine Sonnenberg & Daleen Van der Merwe, 2022. "Transcending Linearity in Understanding Green Consumer Behaviour: A Social–Cognitive Framework for Behaviour Changes in an Emerging Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Best, Rohan & Sinha, Kompal, 2021. "Fuel poverty policy: Go big or go home insulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Luciano Cavalcante Siebert & Alexandre Rasi Aoki & Germano Lambert-Torres & Nelson Lambert-de-Andrade & Nikolaos G. Paterakis, 2020. "An Agent-Based Approach for the Planning of Distribution Grids as a Socio-Technical System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Shan Zhou & Douglas S. Noonan, 2019. "Justice Implications of Clean Energy Policies and Programs in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Poncian, Japhace & Jose, Jim, 2019. "National resource ownership and community engagement in Tanzania's natural gas governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4635-:d:605472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.