IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3426-d572363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Two Different Heat Transfer Fluids on the Performance of Solar Tower CSP by Comparing Recompression Supercritical CO 2 and Rankine Power Cycles, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum

    (Department of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia Boris Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University Nicosia, North Cyprus Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99670, Turkey)

  • Festus Victor Bekun

    (Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey)

  • Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar

    (School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Manoj Kumar Panjwani

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur 65200, Pakistan)

Abstract

China intends to develop its renewable energy sector in order to cut down on its pollution levels. Concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies are expected to play a key role in this agenda. This study evaluated the technical and economic performance of a 100 MW solar tower CSP in Tibet, China, under different heat transfer fluids (HTF), i.e., Salt (60% NaNO 3 40% KNO 3 ) or HTF A, and Salt (46.5% LiF 11.5% NaF 42% KF) or HTF B under two different power cycles, namely supercritical CO 2 and Rankine. Results from the study suggest that the Rankine power cycle with HTF A and B recorded capacity factors (CF) of 39% and 40.3%, respectively. The sCO 2 power cycle also recorded CFs of 41% and 39.4% for HTF A and HTF B, respectively. A total of 359 GWh of energy was generated by the sCO 2 system with HTF B, whereas the sCO 2 system with HTF A generated a total of 345 GWh in the first year. The Rankine system with HTF A generated a total of 341 GWh, while the system with B as its HTF produced a total of 353 GWh of electricity in year one. Electricity to grid mainly occurred between 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. throughout the year. According to the results, the highest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) (real) of 0.1668 USD/kWh was recorded under the Rankine cycle with HTF A. The lowest LCOE (real) of 0.1586 USD/kWh was obtained under the sCO 2 cycle with HTF B. In general, all scenarios were economically viable at the study area; however, the sCO 2 proved to be more economically feasible according to the simulated results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Festus Victor Bekun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Manoj Kumar Panjwani, 2021. "Effect of Two Different Heat Transfer Fluids on the Performance of Solar Tower CSP by Comparing Recompression Supercritical CO 2 and Rankine Power Cycles, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3426-:d:572363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3426/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3426/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirbodi, Kamran & Enjavi-Arsanjani, Mahboubeh & Yaghoubi, Mahmood, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment and environmental impact of concentrating solar power plants in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Zhu, Zhao & Zhang, Da & Mischke, Peggy & Zhang, Xiliang, 2015. "Electricity generation costs of concentrated solar power technologies in China based on operational plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 65-74.
    3. Catalina Hernández & Rodrigo Barraza & Alejandro Saez & Mercedes Ibarra & Danilo Estay, 2020. "Potential Map for the Installation of Concentrated Solar Power Towers in Chile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Li, Yuqiang & Liao, Shengming & Rao, Zhenghua & Liu, Gang, 2014. "A dynamic assessment based feasibility study of concentrating solar power in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 34-42.
    5. Aly, Ahmed & Bernardos, Ana & Fernandez-Peruchena, Carlos M. & Jensen, Steen Solvang & Pedersen, Anders Branth, 2019. "Is Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) a feasible option for Sub-Saharan Africa?: Investigating the techno-economic feasibility of CSP in Tanzania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1224-1240.
    6. Zaharaddeen Ali Hussaini & Peter King & Chris Sansom, 2020. "Numerical Simulation and Design of Multi-Tower Concentrated Solar Power Fields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Sultan, Ali J. & Hughes, Kevin J. & Ingham, Derek B. & Ma, Lin & Pourkashanian, Mohamed, 2020. "Techno-economic competitiveness of 50 MW concentrating solar power plants for electricity generation under Kuwait climatic conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Mihoub, Sofiane & Chermiti, Ali & Beltagy, Hani, 2017. "Methodology of determining the optimum performances of future concentrating solar thermal power plants in Algeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 801-810.
    9. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    10. Ji, Junping & Tang, Hua & Jin, Peng, 2019. "Economic potential to develop concentrating solar power in China: A provincial assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Xu, Xinhai & Vignarooban, K. & Xu, Ben & Hsu, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2016. "Prospects and problems of concentrating solar power technologies for power generation in the desert regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1106-1131.
    12. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    13. Shivashankar, S. & Mekhilef, Saad & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Karimi, M., 2016. "Mitigating methods of power fluctuation of photovoltaic (PV) sources – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1170-1184.
    14. Vignarooban, K. & Xu, Xinhai & Arvay, A. & Hsu, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2015. "Heat transfer fluids for concentrating solar power systems – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 383-396.
    15. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Chen, Yu-Long & Thomson, John Douglas, 2017. "Levelized cost of energy modeling for concentrated solar power projects: A China study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-127.
    16. Islam, Md Tasbirul & Huda, Nazmul & Saidur, R., 2019. "Current energy mix and techno-economic analysis of concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 789-806.
    17. Hakimi, M. & Baniasadi, E. & Afshari, E., 2020. "Thermo-economic analysis of photovoltaic, central tower receiver and parabolic trough power plants for Herat city in Afghanistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 840-853.
    18. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Papul Changmai & Sunil Deka & Shashank Kumar & Thanikanti Sudhakar Babu & Belqasem Aljafari & Benedetto Nastasi, 2022. "A Critical Review on the Estimation Techniques of the Solar PV Cell’s Unknown Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Fábio de Oliveira Neves & Henrique Ewbank & José Arnaldo Frutuoso Roveda & Andrea Trianni & Fernando Pinhabel Marafão & Sandra Regina Monteiro Masalskiene Roveda, 2022. "Economic and Production-Related Implications for Industrial Energy Efficiency: A Logistic Regression Analysis on Cross-Cutting Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mary Oluwatoyin Agboola & Husam Rjoub & Ibrahim Adeshola & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2021. "Linking Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Environmental Degradation in China: What Is the Role of Hydroelectricity Consumption?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Li, Jian & Wang, Zhitao & Li, Shuying & Ming, Liang, 2022. "A SDNN-MPC method for power distribution of COGAG propulsion system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    5. Wenxiong Xi & Mengyao Xu & Kai Ma & Jian Liu, 2022. "Heat Transfer Enhancement Methods Applied in Energy Conversion, Storage and Propulsion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-3, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoru Zhuang & Xinhai Xu & Wenrui Liu & Wenfu Xu, 2019. "LCOE Analysis of Tower Concentrating Solar Power Plants Using Different Molten-Salts for Thermal Energy Storage in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    3. McPherson, Madeleine & Mehos, Mark & Denholm, Paul, 2020. "Leveraging concentrating solar power plant dispatchability: A review of the impacts of global market structures and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Elfeky, Karem Elsayed & Wang, Qiuwang, 2023. "Techno-environ-economic assessment of photovoltaic and CSP with storage systems in China and Egypt under various climatic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Tarun Kumar Aseri & Chandan Sharma & Tara C. Kandpal, 2022. "Condenser cooling technologies for concentrating solar power plants: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4511-4565, April.
    6. Nawaz Edoo & Robert T. F. Ah King, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Utility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Plus Battery Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Hoz, Jordi de la & Martín, Helena & Montalà, Montserrat & Matas, José & Guzman, Ramon, 2018. "Assessing the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the concentrating solar power systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1377-1399.
    8. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    9. Awan, Ahmed Bilal & Zubair, Muhammad & Chandra Mouli, Kotturu V.V., 2020. "Design, optimization and performance comparison of solar tower and photovoltaic power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Chen, Yu-Long & Thomson, John Douglas, 2017. "Levelized cost of energy modeling for concentrated solar power projects: A China study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-127.
    11. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    13. Islam, Md Tasbirul & Huda, Nazmul & Abdullah, A.B. & Saidur, R., 2018. "A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 987-1018.
    14. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    15. Wang, Qiliang & Pei, Gang & Yang, Hongxing, 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of performance-enhanced parabolic trough receiver in concentrated solar power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 629-643.
    16. Sara Pascual & Pilar Lisbona & Luis M. Romeo, 2022. "Thermal Energy Storage in Concentrating Solar Power Plants: A Review of European and North American R&D Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-32, November.
    17. Xu, Xinhai & Vignarooban, K. & Xu, Ben & Hsu, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2016. "Prospects and problems of concentrating solar power technologies for power generation in the desert regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1106-1131.
    18. Alonso-Montesinos, J. & Monterreal, R. & Fernández-Reche, J. & Ballestrín, J. & Carra, E. & Polo, J. & Barbero, J. & Batlles, F.J. & López, G. & Enrique, R. & Martínez-Durbán, M. & Marzo, A., 2019. "Intra-hour energy potential forecasting in a central solar power plant receiver combining Meteosat images and atmospheric extinction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Fan, Jing-Li & Wei, Shijie & Yang, Lin & Wang, Hang & Zhong, Ping & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 143-155.
    20. Coronas, Sergio & Martín, Helena & de la Hoz, Jordi & García de Vicuña, Luis & Castilla, Miguel, 2021. "MONTE-CARLO probabilistic valuation of concentrated solar power systems in Spain under the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3426-:d:572363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.