IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3118-d562986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Technological Processes to Create a Unitary Model for Energy Recovery from Municipal Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Sidełko

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Environmental and Geodetic Sciences, Koszalin University of Technology Poland, Śniadeckich St. 2, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland)

Abstract

The subject matter of this paper is the functioning of a highly effective waste management system. Assumptions of the Energy Recovery Waste Processing (ERWP) model, being a universal solution for towns and regions irrespective of their population, are presented here. The result of simulations illustrating the energetic potential of municipal waste stored and processed in biological and physicochemical processes are also presented. Calculations were performed for the municipality of Koszalin (Poland), with a population of 106,000. Mixed household and commercial waste, organic waste, waste from selective collection and sewage sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant were considered in the waste mass balance. Empirical equations and unit coefficients describing the energetic efficiency of particular processes originating from the author’s own research work as well as from the results available from the scientific literature were used in the calculations. The developed ERWP model is based on the functioning of four objects constituting a comprehensive technical infrastructure, i.e., biological stabilisation in air condition (BSAC), mechanical treatment plant (MTP), cogeneration system plant (CSP) and gas production plant (GPP) where two independent modules operate, namely, dry/wet methane fermentation (DMF and WMF). Each day, this system generates highly energetic refuse-derived fuel (RDF) for combustion in amounts of 82.2 t for CSP and 127.3 t for GPP, generating 5519 m 3 of gas/d. The value of the energy contained in such generated gas and in waste making up an alternative fuel is 1027.4 GJ, which is equivalent to 285.4 MWh. It should be noted that the creation of a waste management system based on the ERWP model assumptions fulfills the criteria of energetic recycling and allows for recovery of energy in the form of gas and heat equivalent to 79,917.6 MWh/a, i.e., 754 kWh/inhabitant/a.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Sidełko, 2021. "Application of Technological Processes to Create a Unitary Model for Energy Recovery from Municipal Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3118-:d:562986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shumal, Mohammad & Taghipour Jahromi, Ahmad Reza & Ferdowsi, Ali & Mehdi Noorbakhsh Dehkordi, Seyed Mohammad & Moloudian, Amin & Dehnavi, Ali, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of municipal solid waste rejected fractions as a source of Refused Derived Fuel in developing countries (case study of Isfahan- Iran): Environmental Impact and sustainable devel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 404-413.
    2. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2013. "Vision 2023: Assessing the feasibility of electricity and biogas production from municipal solid waste in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 52-63.
    4. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Schmukler,Sergio L. & Abraham,Facundo, 2017. "Financial globalization : a glass half empty ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8194, The World Bank.
    6. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo, 2021. "Designing waste management systems to meet circular economy goals: The Italian case," SocArXiv qjcuv, Center for Open Science.
    7. Jouhara, H. & Czajczyńska, D. & Ghazal, H. & Krzyżyńska, R. & Anguilano, L. & Reynolds, A.J. & Spencer, N., 2017. "Municipal waste management systems for domestic use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 485-506.
    8. Damian Walczak & Leszek Dziawgo & Danuta Dziawgo & Michał Buszko & Jarosław Pawłowski & Agnieszka Żołądkiewicz-Kuzioła & Dorota Krupa, 2021. "Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Environmental Protection in the Financial Decisions of Individual Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, Angelika & Szczepaniak, Krzysztof & Cheba, Katarzyna & Gajda, Waldemar & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Innovation in sustainable development: an investigation of the EU context using 2030 agenda indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 251-262.
    10. Li, Yebo & Park, Stephen Y. & Zhu, Jiying, 2011. "Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 821-826, January.
    11. István Kónya & Hiroshi Ohashi, 2007. "International Consumption Patterns among High‐income Countries: Evidence from the OECD Data," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 744-757, September.
    12. Arkadiusz Kijek & Anna Matras-Bolibok, 2020. "Technological convergence across European regions," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(2), pages 295-313, June.
    13. Mu-Xing Lin & Hwa Meei Liou & Kuei Tien Chou, 2020. "National Energy Transition Framework toward SDG7 with Legal Reforms and Policy Bundles: The Case of Taiwan and Its Comparison with Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Marinko Skare & Justyna Franc-Dabrowska & Dajana Cvek, 2020. "Cointegration analysis and VECM of FDI, employment, export and GDP in Croatia (2002–2017) with particular reference to the global crisis and poor macroeconomic governance," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 15(4), pages 761-783, December.
    15. Youhyun Lee & Bomi Kim & Heeju Hwang, 2020. "Which Institutional Conditions Lead to a Successful Local Energy Transition? Applying Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Solar PV Cases in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "Between Poverty and Energy Satisfaction in Polish Households Run by People Aged 60 and Older," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Bartłomiej Iglinski & Karol Flisikowski & Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Urszula Kiełkowska & Mateusz Skrzatek & Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Pomerania Voivodeship—Institutional, Economic, Environmental and Physical Aspects in Light of EU Energy Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Elżbieta Bukalska & Marek Zinecker & Michał Bernard Pietrzak, 2021. "Socioemotional Wealth (SEW) of Family Firms and CEO Behavioral Biases in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Robert Huterski & Agnieszka Huterska & Ewa Zdunek-Rosa & Grażyna Voss, 2021. "Evaluation of the Level of Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak, 2022. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-7, June.
    6. Monika Klemke-Pitek & Magdalena Majchrzak, 2022. "Pro-Ecological Activities and Shaping the Competitive Advantage of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Aspect of Sustainable Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Bartłomiej Igliński & Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Urszula Kiełkowska & Mateusz Skrzatek & Artur Gajdos & Anas Zyadin & Karthikeyan Natarajan, 2022. "How to Meet the Green Deal Objectives—Is It Possible to Obtain 100% RES at the Regional Level in the EU?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Nicole Meinusch & Susanne Kramer & Oliver Körner & Jürgen Wiese & Ingolf Seick & Anita Beblek & Regine Berges & Bernhard Illenberger & Marco Illenberger & Jennifer Uebbing & Maximilian Wolf & Gunter S, 2021. "Integrated Cycles for Urban Biomass as a Strategy to Promote a CO 2 -Neutral Society—A Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Aneta Czechowska-Kosacka & Agnieszka Rzepka & Tomasz Lipecki & Ewa Łazuka & Paweł Wlaź, 2022. "Consumer Awareness of Renewable Energy Sources: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Anna Manowska & Anna Bluszcz, 2022. "Forecasting Crude Oil Consumption in Poland Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Green Jobs in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Magdalena Majchrzak & Piotr Szczypa & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Supply of Wood Biomass in Poland in Terms of Extraordinary Threat and Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Prafula Pearce, 2023. "Special Issue “Energy Transition and Environmental Sustainability”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-3, March.
    16. Katarzyna Cheba & Iwona Bąk, 2021. "Environmental Production Efficiency in the European Union Countries as a Tool for the Implementation of Goal 7 of the 2030 Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Marta Kuc-Czarnecka, 2022. "Transformation of Energy Markets: Description, Modeling of Functioning Mechanisms and Determining Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-6, July.
    18. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    19. McCauley, Darren & Pettigrew, Kerry, 2023. "Building a just transition in asia-pacific: Four strategies for reducing fossil fuel dependence and investing in clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3118-:d:562986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.