IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2295-d354360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Study of Changes in Wind Power in the Indian Shelf Seas over the Last 40 Years

Author

Listed:
  • V. Sanil Kumar

    (Ocean Engineering Division, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), Dona Paula, Goa 403004, India)

  • Aswathy B. Asok

    (Ocean Engineering Division, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), Dona Paula, Goa 403004, India
    Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala 682016, India)

  • Jesbin George

    (Ocean Engineering Division, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), Dona Paula, Goa 403004, India)

  • M. M. Amrutha

    (Ocean Engineering Division, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research), Dona Paula, Goa 403004, India)

Abstract

Wind power variations at two heights (the surface level and turbine hub level) were investigated at 20 locations in the shelf seas of India using hourly fifth generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate (ERA5) data covering the last 40 years (1979 to 2018). The interannual and seasonal variability in wind power was studied. The wind power density, the exceedance probability of power density and the exploitable wind resources were examined. In the Indian shelf seas, the annual mean wind power density at 10 m above mean sea level varies from 82 to 353 W/m 2 . Wind power density at 110.8 m is 20% to 40% higher than at 10 m above mean sea level. The study shows that the shelf seas have an abundance of wind power, with wind speeds over 3 m/s during 90% of the time at locations 1 to 3, 12 and 13, with a high occurrence of exploitable wind energy above 0.7 × 10 3 kWh/m 2 . Among the locations studied, the most power-rich area was location 12, where during ~62% of the time power was greater than 200 W/m 2 . A significant change (~10–35%) in inter-annual wind power density was detected at a few locations, and these variations were associated with Indian summer monsoon and El Niño–Southern Oscillation events. Trend analysis suggests a decreasing trend in the annual mean wind power density for most of the locations in the Indian shelf seas over the last 40 years. Wind power has considerable directional distribution, and at different locations the annual wind power from the dominant direction is 10% to 79% of the total available power from all directions.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Sanil Kumar & Aswathy B. Asok & Jesbin George & M. M. Amrutha, 2020. "Regional Study of Changes in Wind Power in the Indian Shelf Seas over the Last 40 Years," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2295-:d:354360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2295/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2295/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Kumar & T. Anoop, 2015. "Spatial and temporal variations of wave height in shelf seas around India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 1693-1706, September.
    2. Olauson, Jon, 2018. "ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 322-331.
    3. Sheridan, Blaise & Baker, Scott D. & Pearre, Nathaniel S. & Firestone, Jeremy & Kempton, Willett, 2012. "Calculating the offshore wind power resource: Robust assessment methods applied to the U.S. Atlantic Coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 224-233.
    4. Chowdhury, Souma & Zhang, Jie & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2012. "Unrestricted wind farm layout optimization (UWFLO): Investigating key factors influencing the maximum power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 16-30.
    5. Zheng, Chong-wei & Xiao, Zi-niu & Peng, Yue-hua & Li, Chong-yin & Du, Zhi-bo, 2018. "Rezoning global offshore wind energy resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 1-11.
    6. Bosch, Jonathan & Staffell, Iain & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "Temporally explicit and spatially resolved global offshore wind energy potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 766-781.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Upma Singh & Mohammad Rizwan & Hasmat Malik & Fausto Pedro García Márquez, 2022. "Wind Energy Scenario, Success and Initiatives towards Renewable Energy in India—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-39, March.
    2. Seyed Morteza Alizadeh & Sakineh Sadeghipour & Cagil Ozansoy & Akhtar Kalam, 2020. "Developing a Mathematical Model for Wind Power Plant Siting and Sizing in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-34, July.
    3. Valliyil Mohammed Aboobacker & Puthuveetil Razak Shanas & Subramanian Veerasingam & Ebrahim M. A. S. Al-Ansari & Fadhil N. Sadooni & Ponnumony Vethamony, 2021. "Long-Term Assessment of Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potentials of Qatar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Giovanni Gualtieri, 2021. "Reliability of ERA5 Reanalysis Data for Wind Resource Assessment: A Comparison against Tall Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Rebecca J. Barthelmie & Kaitlyn E. Dantuono & Emma J. Renner & Frederick L. Letson & Sara C. Pryor, 2021. "Extreme Wind and Waves in U.S. East Coast Offshore Wind Energy Lease Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Reinhold Lehneis & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Temporally and Spatially Resolved Simulation of the Wind Power Generation in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Gruber, Katharina & Regner, Peter & Wehrle, Sebastian & Zeyringer, Marianne & Schmidt, Johannes, 2022. "Towards global validation of wind power simulations: A multi-country assessment of wind power simulation from MERRA-2 and ERA-5 reanalyses bias-corrected with the global wind atlas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    4. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Elsner, Paul, 2019. "Continental-scale assessment of the African offshore wind energy potential: Spatial analysis of an under-appreciated renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 394-407.
    6. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Gil Ruiz, Samuel Andrés & Barriga, Julio Eduardo Cañón & Martínez, J. Alejandro, 2021. "Wind power assessment in the Caribbean region of Colombia, using ten-minute wind observations and ERA5 data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 158-176.
    8. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    9. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    10. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Srihari Sundar & Michael T. Craig & Ashley E. Payne & David J. Brayshaw & Flavio Lehner, 2023. "Meteorological drivers of resource adequacy failures in current and high renewable Western U.S. power systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Erşen, Emre & Çelikpala, Mitat, 2019. "Turkey and the changing energy geopolitics of Eurasia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 584-592.
    13. Baheri, Ali & Ramaprabhu, Praveen & Vermillion, Christopher, 2018. "Iterative 3D layout optimization and parametric trade study for a reconfigurable ocean current turbine array using Bayesian Optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1052-1063.
    14. Mittal, Prateek & Kulkarni, Kedar & Mitra, Kishalay, 2016. "A novel hybrid optimization methodology to optimize the total number and placement of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 133-147.
    15. Kuo, Jim Y.J. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2015. "A mechanistic semi-empirical wake interaction model for wind farm layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2157-2165.
    16. Shengli Liao & Xudong Tian & Benxi Liu & Tian Liu & Huaying Su & Binbin Zhou, 2022. "Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Based on LightGBM and Meteorological Reanalysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    18. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "Tidal farm analysis using an analytical model for the flow velocity prediction in the wake of a tidal turbine with small diameter to depth ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 347-359.
    19. Souma Chowdhury & Ali Mehmani & Jie Zhang & Achille Messac, 2016. "Market Suitability and Performance Tradeoffs Offered by Commercial Wind Turbines across Differing Wind Regimes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2295-:d:354360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.