IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i24p6554-d460704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine-Learning Methods to Select Potential Depot Locations for the Supply Chain of Biomass Co-Firing

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Goettsch

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Sustainable Energy Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

  • Krystel K. Castillo-Villar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Sustainable Energy Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

  • Maria Aranguren

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Sustainable Energy Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

Abstract

Coal is the second-largest source for electricity generation in the United States. However, the burning of coal produces dangerous gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. One alternative to decrease these emissions is biomass co-firing. To establish biomass as a viable option, the optimization of the biomass supply chain (BSC) is essential. Although most of the research conducted has focused on optimization models, the purpose of this paper is to incorporate machine-learning (ML) algorithms into a stochastic Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model to select potential storage depot locations and improve the solution in two ways: by decreasing the total cost of the BSC and the computational burden. We consider the level of moisture and level of ash in the biomass from each parcel location, the average expected biomass yield, and the distance from each parcel to the closest power plant. The training labels (whether a potential depot location is beneficial or not) are obtained through the stochastic MILP model. Multiple ML algorithms are applied to a case study in the northeast area of the United States: Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) Neural Network. After applying the hybrid methodology combining ML and optimization, it is found that the MLP outperforms the other algorithms in terms of selecting potential depots that decrease the total cost of the BSC and the computational burden of the stochastic MILP model. The LR and the DT also perform well in terms of decreasing total cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Goettsch & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Maria Aranguren, 2020. "Machine-Learning Methods to Select Potential Depot Locations for the Supply Chain of Biomass Co-Firing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6554-:d:460704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poudel, Sushil Raj & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan, 2016. "A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-25.
    2. Roni, Md.S. & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Searcy, Erin & Jha, Krishna, 2014. "A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 115-134.
    3. Maria F. Aranguren & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Mario Aboytes-Ojeda & Marcio H. Giacomoni, 2018. "Simulation-Optimization Approach for the Logistics Network Design of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Kate A. Smith, 1999. "Neural Networks for Combinatorial Optimization: A Review of More Than a Decade of Research," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 15-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Matveeva & Aleksey Bychkov, 2022. "How to Train an Artificial Neural Network to Predict Higher Heating Values of Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria F. Aranguren & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Mario Aboytes-Ojeda & Marcio H. Giacomoni, 2018. "Simulation-Optimization Approach for the Logistics Network Design of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Monfared, M.A.S. & Etemadi, M., 2006. "The impact of energy function structure on solving generalized assignment problem using Hopfield neural network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 645-654, January.
    3. Hadi Karimi & Sandra D. Ekşioğlu & Michael Carbajales-Dale, 2021. "A biobjective chance constrained optimization model to evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of biopower supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 95-130, January.
    4. Eric Larsen & Sébastien Lachapelle & Yoshua Bengio & Emma Frejinger & Simon Lacoste-Julien & Andrea Lodi, 2022. "Predicting Tactical Solutions to Operational Planning Problems Under Imperfect Information," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 227-242, January.
    5. Stanimirović, Predrag & Gerontitis, Dimitris & Tzekis, Panagiotis & Behera, Ratikanta & Sahoo, Jajati Keshari, 2021. "Simulation of Varying Parameter Recurrent Neural Network with application to matrix inversion," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 614-628.
    6. Sangpil Ko & Kyoungjoon Choi & Seungmin Yu & Jun Lee, 2022. "A Stochastic Optimization Model for Sustainable Multimodal Transportation for Bioenergy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Emilio Moretti & Elena Tappia & Veronique Limère & Marco Melacini, 2021. "Exploring the application of machine learning to the assembly line feeding problem," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 403-419, December.
    8. Iakov Karandashev & Boris Kryzhanovsky, 2013. "Increasing the attraction area of the global minimum in the binary optimization problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1167-1185, July.
    9. Carrasco, M. P. & Pato, M. V., 2004. "A comparison of discrete and continuous neural network approaches to solve the class/teacher timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 65-79, February.
    10. Dafnomilis, I. & Duinkerken, M.B. & Junginger, M. & Lodewijks, G. & Schott, D.L., 2018. "Optimal equipment deployment for biomass terminal operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 147-163.
    11. Stavrou, Eleni T. & Charalambous, Christakis & Spiliotis, Stelios, 2007. "Human resource management and performance: A neural network analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 453-467, August.
    12. Bengio, Yoshua & Lodi, Andrea & Prouvost, Antoine, 2021. "Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: A methodological tour d’horizon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 405-421.
    13. Jatinder N. D. Gupta & Randall S. Sexton & Enar A. Tunc, 2000. "Selecting Scheduling Heuristics Using Neural Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 150-162, May.
    14. Pokharel, Raju & Latta, Gregory S., 2020. "A network analysis to identify forest merchantability limitations across the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Stavrou, Eleni & Spiliotis, Stelios & Charalambous, Chris, 2010. "Flexible working arrangements in context: An empirical investigation through self-organizing maps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 893-902, May.
    16. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Sushil R. Poudel & Md Abdul Quddus & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Linkan Bian & Reuben F. Burch V, 2019. "Managing congestion in a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 739-781, February.
    18. Christoph Hertrich & Martin Skutella, 2023. "Provably Good Solutions to the Knapsack Problem via Neural Networks of Bounded Size," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1079-1097, September.
    19. Justin J. Boutilier & Timothy C. Y. Chan, 2023. "Introducing and Integrating Machine Learning in an Operations Research Curriculum: An Application-Driven Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 64-83, January.
    20. Sushil Poudel & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Md Abdul Quddus & Sudipta Chowdhury & Linkan Bian & Brian Smith, 2018. "Designing a Reliable and Congested Multi-Modal Facility Location Problem for Biofuel Supply Chain Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6554-:d:460704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.