IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5121-d422807.html

Evaluation of Wind Flow Characteristics by RANS-Based Numerical Site Calibration (NSC) Method with Met-Tower Measurements and Its Application to a Complex Terrain

Author

Listed:
  • Jae-ho Jeong

    (Departement of Mechanical Engineering, Global Campus, Gachon University, Gyeonggi 13557, Korea)

  • Kwangtae Ha

    (Floating Offshore Wind Energy Systems, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Korea)

Abstract

The performance of wind turbines is not only dependent on the wind turbine design itself, but is also dependent on the accurate assessment of wind resources at the installation site. In this paper, the numerical site calibration (NSC) method using three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulation was proposed to accurately forecast the wind flow characteristics of wind turbine sites with complex terrains, namely Methil in Scotland, and Haenam in South Korea. From NSC at the Methil and Haenam sites, it was shown that the complicated and vortical flow fields around hills and valleys were captured using the three-dimensional RANS CFD simulation in Ansys CFX software based on a high-resolution scheme with a renormalization group (RNG)-based k-ε turbulence model. It was also shown that topographically induced wind profile and turbulence intensity over a local-scale complex terrain are remarkably dominated by flow separation after passing hills. It was concluded that the proposed NSC method using three-dimensional RANS simulation with a high-resolution scheme was an economically useful method for evaluating wind flow characteristics numerically to assess wind turbine sites with complex terrains and designing the wind farm layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae-ho Jeong & Kwangtae Ha, 2020. "Evaluation of Wind Flow Characteristics by RANS-Based Numerical Site Calibration (NSC) Method with Met-Tower Measurements and Its Application to a Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5121-:d:422807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Soo-Hyun & Shin, Hyung-Ki & Joo, Young-Chul & Kim, Keon-Hoon, 2015. "A study of the wake effects on the wind characteristics and fatigue loads for the turbines in a wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 536-543.
    2. Leonardo P. Chamorro & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2011. "Turbulent Flow Inside and Above a Wind Farm: A Wind-Tunnel Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Husien, Walid & El-Osta, Wedad & Dekam, Elhadi, 2013. "Effect of the wake behind wind rotor on optimum energy output of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 128-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuichao Ma & Huanqiang Zhang & Xiaoxia Gao & Xiaodong Wang & Heng Nian & Wei Fan, 2024. "Research on Evaluation Method of Wind Farm Wake Energy Efficiency Loss Based on SCADA Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Mattuella, J.M.L. & Loredo-Souza, A.M. & Oliveira, M.G.K. & Petry, A.P., 2016. "Wind tunnel experimental analysis of a complex terrain micrositing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 110-119.
    3. Kale, Baris & Buckingham, Sophia & van Beeck, Jeroen & Cuerva-Tejero, Alvaro, 2023. "Comparison of the wake characteristics and aerodynamic response of a wind turbine under varying atmospheric conditions using WRF-LES-GAD and WRF-LES-GAL wind turbine models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Yaqing Jin & Huiwen Liu & Rajan Aggarwal & Arvind Singh & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2016. "Effects of Freestream Turbulence in a Model Wind Turbine Wake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Qi, 2019. "A two-dimensional model based on the expansion of physical wake boundary for wind-turbine wakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 975-984.
    6. Zehtabiyan-Rezaie, Navid & Abkar, Mahdi, 2024. "An extended k−ɛ model for wake-flow simulation of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Sun, Haiying & Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "A review of full-scale wind-field measurements of the wind-turbine wake effect and a measurement of the wake-interaction effect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the average wind speed of a single wind turbine and development of a novel three-dimensional multiple wind turbine wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 192-203.
    9. Shen, Wen Zhong & Zhu, Wei Jun & Barlas, Emre & Li, Ye, 2019. "Advanced flow and noise simulation method for wind farm assessment in complex terrain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1812-1825.
    10. Majid Bastankhah & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "A New Miniature Wind Turbine for Wind Tunnel Experiments. Part I: Design and Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    12. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Li, Qing'an & Cai, Chang & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Hiromori, Yuto & Zhou, Shuni & Xu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Prediction of power generation of two 30 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines with Gaussian model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Khadijah Barashid & Amr Munshi & Ahmad Alhindi, 2023. "Wind Farm Power Prediction Considering Layout and Wake Effect: Case Study of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Hongbin Liu & Ziyan Wang & Yizhuo Liu & Jie Zhou & Chen Chen & Haoyuan Ma & Xi Huang & Hongqing Wang & Xiaodong Ji, 2025. "A Transformer-Based Hybrid Neural Network Integrating Multiresolution Turbulence Intensity and Independent Modeling of Multiple Meteorological Features for Wind Speed Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-38, August.
    16. Jong-Hyeon Shin & Jong-Hwi Lee & Se-Myong Chang, 2019. "A Simplified Numerical Model for the Prediction of Wake Interaction in Multiple Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Kang, Yujoo & Kim, Hyebin & Lee, Sang, 2023. "Benefits of individual pitch control on offshore wind turbine submerged in upstream wake," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Sturge, D. & While, A. & Howell, R., 2014. "Engineering and energy yield: The missing dimension of wind turbine assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 245-250.
    19. Karina Soto-Rivas & David Richter & Cristian Escauriaza, 2019. "A Formulation of the Thrust Coefficient for Representing Finite-Sized Farms of Tidal Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Wang, Yan & Lu, Pan & Zhou, Yongze & Guan, Ronghu & Li, Rennian, 2025. "Insight into the impact of turbine-array configurations on the power output and wake effects of a finite-size wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5121-:d:422807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.