IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i20p3861-d275722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Formulation of the Thrust Coefficient for Representing Finite-Sized Farms of Tidal Energy Converters

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Soto-Rivas

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
    Marine Energy Research & Innovation Center (MERIC), Av. Apoquindo 2827, Santiago 7550268, Chile)

  • David Richter

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA)

  • Cristian Escauriaza

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Marine Energy Research & Innovation Center (MERIC), Av. Apoquindo 2827, Santiago 7550268, Chile)

Abstract

Tidal energy converter (TEC) arrays in tidal channels generate complex flow phenomena due to interactions with the local environment and among devices. Models with different resolutions are thus employed to study flows past TEC farms, which consider multiple spatial and temporal scales. Simulations over tidal cycles use mesoscale ocean circulation models, incorporating a thrust coefficient to model the momentum sink that represents the effects of the array. In this work, we propose an expression for a thrust coefficient to represent finite-sized farms of TEC turbines at larger scales, C t F a r m , which depends on the spatial organization of the devices. We use a coherent-structure resolving turbulence model coupled with the actuator disk approach to simulate staggered turbine configurations in more detail, varying the separation among devices and the ratios between the channel depths and hub heights. Based on these simulations, we calculate the resultant force for various subsets of devices within the farm, and their corresponding effective thrust coefficient, C t F a r m . We conclude that the thrust coefficient depends solely on the lateral separation of the devices, S y , for farms with only two rows. For farms with more than two rows, the streamwise distance, S x , must be considered as well. With the proposed expression, it is possible to calculate efficiently the effects of finite-sized TEC farms and incorporate a momentum sink into ocean circulation models, without assuming a constant coefficient derived from an infinite farm approximation.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Soto-Rivas & David Richter & Cristian Escauriaza, 2019. "A Formulation of the Thrust Coefficient for Representing Finite-Sized Farms of Tidal Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3861-:d:275722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Piano & Peter E. Robins & Alan G. Davies & Simon P. Neill, 2018. "The Influence of Intra-Array Wake Dynamics on Depth-Averaged Kinetic Tidal Turbine Energy Extraction Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Lloyd, Thomas P. & Turnock, Stephen R. & Humphrey, Victor F., 2014. "Assessing the influence of inflow turbulence on noise and performance of a tidal turbine using large eddy simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 742-754.
    3. Hill, Craig & Musa, Mirko & Guala, Michele, 2016. "Interaction between instream axial flow hydrokinetic turbines and uni-directional flow bedforms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 409-421.
    4. Frost, Carwyn H. & Evans, Paul S. & Harrold, Magnus J. & Mason-Jones, Allan & O'Doherty, Tim & O'Doherty, Daphne M., 2017. "The impact of axial flow misalignment on a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1333-1344.
    5. Wang, Taiping & Yang, Zhaoqing, 2017. "A modeling study of tidal energy extraction and the associated impact on tidal circulation in a multi-inlet bay system of Puget Sound," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 204-214.
    6. Leonardo P. Chamorro & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2011. "Turbulent Flow Inside and Above a Wind Farm: A Wind-Tunnel Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Kolekar, Nitin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2015. "Performance characterization and placement of a marine hydrokinetic turbine in a tidal channel under boundary proximity and blockage effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 121-133.
    8. Mirko Musa & Craig Hill & Fotis Sotiropoulos & Michele Guala, 2018. "Performance and resilience of hydrokinetic turbine arrays under large migrating fluvial bedforms," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 839-846, October.
    9. Myers, L.E. & Bahaj, A.S., 2012. "An experimental investigation simulating flow effects in first generation marine current energy converter arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 28-36.
    10. Robins, Peter E. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matt J. & Ward, Sophie L., 2015. "Characterising the spatial and temporal variability of the tidal-stream energy resource over the northwest European shelf seas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 510-522.
    11. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    12. Aghsaee, Payam & Markfort, Corey D., 2018. "Effects of flow depth variations on the wake recovery behind a horizontal-axis hydrokinetic in-stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 620-629.
    13. Stansby, Peter & Stallard, Tim, 2016. "Fast optimisation of tidal stream turbine positions for power generation in small arrays with low blockage based on superposition of self-similar far-wake velocity deficit profiles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 366-375.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soto-Rivas, Karina & Richter, David & Escauriaza, Cristian, 2022. "Flow effects of finite-sized tidal turbine arrays in the Chacao Channel, Southern Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 637-647.
    2. Marko Kinne & Sebastian Thöns, 2023. "Fatigue Reliability Based on Predicted Posterior Stress Ranges Determined from Strain Measurements of Wind Turbine Support Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig Hill & Vincent S. Neary & Michele Guala & Fotis Sotiropoulos, 2020. "Performance and Wake Characterization of a Model Hydrokinetic Turbine: The Reference Model 1 (RM1) Dual Rotor Tidal Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Sun, Jian & Guo, Jinxi & Wu, Wenlong, 2019. "Hydrodynamic effects of the ratio of rotor diameter to water depth: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 331-341.
    3. Soto-Rivas, Karina & Richter, David & Escauriaza, Cristian, 2022. "Flow effects of finite-sized tidal turbine arrays in the Chacao Channel, Southern Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 637-647.
    4. Niebuhr, C.M. & Schmidt, S. & van Dijk, M. & Smith, L. & Neary, V.S., 2022. "A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Dou, Bingzheng & Guala, Michele & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2019. "Wake model for horizontal-axis wind and hydrokinetic turbines in yawed conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1383-1395.
    6. Chawdhary, Saurabh & Hill, Craig & Yang, Xiaolei & Guala, Michele & Corren, Dean & Colby, Jonathan & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2017. "Wake characteristics of a TriFrame of axial-flow hydrokinetic turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 332-345.
    7. Almoghayer, Mohammed A. & Woolf, David K. & Kerr, Sandy & Davies, Gareth, 2022. "Integration of tidal energy into an island energy system – A case study of Orkney islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Maduka, Maduka & Li, Chi Wai, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of power performance and wake characteristics of twin flanged duct turbines in tandem under bi-directional tidal flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1543-1567.
    9. Marco Piano & Peter E. Robins & Alan G. Davies & Simon P. Neill, 2018. "The Influence of Intra-Array Wake Dynamics on Depth-Averaged Kinetic Tidal Turbine Energy Extraction Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    11. El Fajri, Oumnia & Bowman, Joshua & Bhushan, Shanti & Thompson, David & O'Doherty, Tim, 2022. "Numerical study of the effect of tip-speed ratio on hydrokinetic turbine wake recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 725-750.
    12. Laws, Nicholas D. & Epps, Brenden P., 2016. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion: Technology, research, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1245-1259.
    13. Gao, Jinjin & Liu, Han & Lee, Jiyong & Zheng, Yuan & Guala, Michele & Shen, Lian, 2022. "Large-eddy simulation and Co-Design strategy for a drag-type vertical axis hydrokinetic turbine in open channel flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1305-1316.
    14. Musa, Mirko & Hill, Craig & Guala, Michele, 2019. "Interaction between hydrokinetic turbine wakes and sediment dynamics: array performance and geomorphic effects under different siting strategies and sediment transport conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 738-753.
    15. Clemente Gotelli & Mirko Musa & Michele Guala & Cristián Escauriaza, 2019. "Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wake Interactions of Marine Hydrokinetic Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Ebrahimi, Mohsen & Duncan, Susannah & Belmont, Michael R. & Kripakaran, Prakash & Tabor, Gavin R. & Moon, Ian & Djordjević, Slobodan, 2020. "Flume experiments on the impact of a cross-flow turbine on an erodible bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1219-1225.
    17. Liu, Xiaodong & Feng, Bo & Liu, Di & Wang, Yiming & Zhao, Haitao & Si, Yulin & Zhang, Dahai & Qian, Peng, 2022. "Study on two-rotor interaction of counter-rotating horizontal axis tidal turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Nitin Kolekar & Ashwin Vinod & Arindam Banerjee, 2019. "On Blockage Effects for a Tidal Turbine in Free Surface Proximity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Guillou, Nicolas & Thiébot, Jérôme, 2016. "The impact of seabed rock roughness on tidal stream power extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 762-773.
    20. Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Masters, Ian & Banerjee, Arindam & VanZwieten, James H., 2020. "A spatially nonlinear generalised actuator disk model for the simulation of horizontal axis wind and tidal turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:20:p:3861-:d:275722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.