IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3397-d379356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CO 2 Storage in a Shale Gas Reservoir Compared to a Deep Saline Aquifer in the Ordos Basin of China

Author

Listed:
  • Danqing Liu

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yilian Li

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ramesh Agarwal

    (Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)

Abstract

As a new “sink” of CO 2 permanent storage, the depleted shale reservoir is very promising compared to the deep saline aquifer. To provide a greater understanding of the benefits of CO 2 storage in a shale reservoir, a comparative study is conducted by establishing the full-mechanism model, including the hydrodynamic trapping, adsorption trapping, residual trapping, solubility trapping as well as the mineral trapping corresponding to the typical shale and deep saline aquifer parameters from the Ordos basin in China. The results show that CO 2 storage in the depleted shale reservoir has merits in storage safety by trapping more CO 2 in stable immobile phase due to adsorption and having gentler and ephemeral pressure perturbation responding to CO 2 injection. The effect of various CO 2 injection schemes, namely the high-speed continuous injection, low-speed continuous injection, huff-n-puff injection and water alternative injection, on the phase transformation of CO 2 in a shale reservoir and CO 2 -injection-induced perturbations in formation pressure are also examined. With the aim of increasing the fraction of immobile CO 2 while maintaining a safe pressure-perturbation, it is shown that an intermittent injection procedure with multiple slugs of hug-n-puff injection can be employed and within the allowable range of pressure increase, and the CO 2 injection rate can be maximized to increase the CO 2 storage capacity and security in shale reservoir.

Suggested Citation

  • Danqing Liu & Yilian Li & Ramesh Agarwal, 2020. "Evaluation of CO 2 Storage in a Shale Gas Reservoir Compared to a Deep Saline Aquifer in the Ordos Basin of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3397-:d:379356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3397/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3397/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Tae Hong & Cho, Jinhyung & Lee, Kun Sang, 2017. "Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1195-1206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vo Thanh, Hung & Yasin, Qamar & Al-Mudhafar, Watheq J. & Lee, Kang-Kun, 2022. "Knowledge-based machine learning techniques for accurate prediction of CO2 storage performance in underground saline aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Muhammad Hammad Rasool & Maqsood Ahmad & Muhammad Ayoub, 2023. "Selecting Geological Formations for CO 2 Storage: A Comparative Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Huang, Liang & Ning, Zhengfu & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Wentong & Cheng, Zhilin & Wu, Xiaojun & Qin, Huibo, 2018. "Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 28-43.
    3. Rahmad Syah & Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution & Afshin Davarpanah & Dadan Ramdan & Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally, 2021. "A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Nguyen, Phong & Carey, J. William & Viswanathan, Hari S. & Porter, Mark, 2018. "Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 160-174.
    5. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    6. Wen, Chuang & Karvounis, Nikolas & Walther, Jens Honore & Yan, Yuying & Feng, Yuqing & Yang, Yan, 2019. "An efficient approach to separate CO2 using supersonic flows for carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 311-319.
    7. Tzu-Keng Lin & Bieng-Zih Hsieh, 2020. "Prevention of Seabed Subsidence of Class-1 Gas Hydrate Deposits via CO 2 -EGR: A Numerical Study with Coupled Geomechanics-Hydrate Reaction-Multiphase Fluid Flow Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    9. Zeng, Bo & Duan, Huiming & Bai, Yun & Meng, Wei, 2018. "Forecasting the output of shale gas in China using an unbiased grey model and weakening buffer operator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 238-249.
    10. Boning Zhang & Baochao Shan & Yulong Zhao & Liehui Zhang, 2020. "Review of Formation and Gas Characteristics in Shale Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-50, October.
    11. Feng, Gan & Kang, Yong & Sun, Ze-dong & Wang, Xiao-chuan & Hu, Yao-qing, 2019. "Effects of supercritical CO2 adsorption on the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 870-882.
    12. Zhang, Zhien & Pan, Shu-Yuan & Li, Hao & Cai, Jianchao & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Anthony, Edward John & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Yang, Run & Liu, Xiangui & Yu, Rongze & Hu, Zhiming & Duan, Xianggang, 2022. "Long short-term memory suggests a model for predicting shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Zhang, Xiang & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Dianlin & Lu, Jun & Tong, Jing, 2021. "Characterizing pore-level oil mobilization processes in unconventional reservoirs assisted by state-of-the-art nuclear magnetic resonance technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Chen, Lei & Huang, Ding-Bin & Wang, Shan-You & Nie, Yi-Nan & He, Ya-Ling & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2019. "A study on dynamic desorption process of methane in slits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1174-1180.
    16. Ding, Hongbing & Zhang, Yu & Dong, Yuanyuan & Wen, Chuang & Yang, Yan, 2023. "High-pressure supersonic carbon dioxide (CO2) separation benefiting carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    17. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Huang, Jingwei & Jin, Tianying & Barrufet, Maria & Killough, John, 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Wang, Yanwei & Dai, Zhenxue & Chen, Li & Shen, Xudong & Chen, Fangxuan & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza, 2023. "An integrated multi-scale model for CO2 transport and storage in shale reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    20. Zhang, Xue & Su, Yuliang & Li, Lei & Da, Qi'an & Hao, Yongmao & Wang, Wendong & Liu, Jiahui & Gao, Xiaogang & Zhao, An & Wang, Kaiyu, 2022. "Microscopic remaining oil initiation mechanism and formation damage of CO2 injection after waterflooding in deep reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3397-:d:379356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.