IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3326-d378194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Guide to Different Fracturing Technologies: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • M. S. Liew

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro

    (Offshore Engineering Centre, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing has made the production of gas more economical. Shale gas possesses the potential to arise as a main natural gas source worldwide. It has been assessed that the top 42 countries, including the U.S., are predicted to own 7299 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of technically recoverable shale gas resources. The main goal of this paper is to serve as a guide of different shale gas extraction methods. The significance of these methods and possible pros and cons are determined. Each technique was explained with the support of literature review. Specifically, this paper revealed that some fracking methods such as pulsed arc electrohydraulic discharges (PAED), plasma stimulation and fracturing technology (PSF), thermal (cryogenic) fracturing, enhanced bacterial methanogenesis, and heating of rock mass are at the concept stage for conventional and other unconventional resources. Thus, these found to be significant for stimulating natural gas wells, which provides very good production results. This paper also discovered that fracking remains the recommended technique used by the oil and gas industries.

Suggested Citation

  • M. S. Liew & Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro & Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi, 2020. "A Comprehensive Guide to Different Fracturing Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3326-:d:378194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Meng, Jing & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "An extended overview of natural gas use embodied in world economy and supply chains: Policy implications from a time series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Jingxuan Zhang & Xiangjun Liu & Xiaochen Wei & Lixi Liang & Jian Xiong & Wei Li, 2019. "Uncertainty Analysis of Factors Influencing Stimulated Fracture Volume in Layered Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Neil Gunningham, 2014. "A shale gas revolution for China?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 302-320, March.
    4. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Rogers, Howard, 2014. "Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-28.
    5. Jennifer Winter & Sarah Dobson & G. Kent Fellows & Dexter Lam & Paul Craig, 2018. "An Overview of Global Liquefied Natural Gas Markets and Implications for Canada," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 11(21), July.
    6. Solarin, Sakiru Adebola & Gil-Alana, Luis A. & Lafuente, Carmen, 2020. "An investigation of long range reliance on shale oil and shale gas production in the U.S. market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Jan Kersting & Vicki Duscha & Joachim Schleich & Kimon Keramidas, 2018. "The impact of shale gas on the costs of climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 442-458, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Panpan & Zhang, Yiqun & Zhang, Wenhong & Tian, Shouceng, 2022. "Numerical simulation of gas production from natural gas hydrate deposits with multi-branch wells: Influence of reservoir properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Sotirios Nik. Longinos & Lei Wang & Randy Hazlett, 2022. "Advances in Cryogenic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs with LN 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Marek Jendryś & Andrzej Hadam & Mateusz Ćwiękała, 2021. "Directional Hydraulic Fracturing (DHF) of the Roof, as an Element of Rock Burst Prevention in the Light of Underground Observations and Numerical Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Zhang, Yiqun & Zhang, Panpan & Hui, Chengyu & Tian, Shouceng & Zhang, Bo, 2023. "Numerical analysis of the geomechanical responses during natural gas hydrate production by multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Faisal Mehmood & Michael Z. Hou & Jianxing Liao & Muhammad Haris & Cheng Cao & Jiashun Luo, 2021. "Multiphase Multicomponent Numerical Modeling for Hydraulic Fracturing with N-Heptane for Efficient Stimulation in a Tight Gas Reservoir of Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Oleg Bazaluk & Orest Slabyi & Vasyl Vekeryk & Andrii Velychkovych & Liubomyr Ropyak & Vasyl Lozynskyi, 2021. "A Technology of Hydrocarbon Fluid Production Intensification by Productive Stratum Drainage Zone Reaming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yan & Wang, Limao & Fang, Yebing & Mou, Chufu, 2017. "Integrated value of shale gas development: A comparative analysis in the United States and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1465-1478.
    2. Wang, Qiang & Zhan, Lina, 2019. "Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 353-364.
    3. Sharafian, Amir & Talebian, Hoda & Blomerus, Paul & Herrera, Omar & Mérida, Walter, 2017. "A review of liquefied natural gas refueling station designs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 503-513.
    4. Xiaoyan Zou & Xianqing Li & Jizhen Zhang & Huantong Li & Man Guo & Pei Zhao, 2021. "Characteristics of Pore Structure and Gas Content of the Lower Paleozoic Shale from the Upper Yangtze Plate, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    7. Luis Sarmiento & Thorsten Burandt & Konstantin Löffler & Pao-Yu Oei, 2019. "Analyzing Scenarios for the Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in the Mexican Energy System—An Application of the Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Ji, Xi & Liu, Yifang & Wu, Guowei & Su, Pinyi & Ye, Zhen & Feng, Kuishuang, 2022. "Global value chain participation and trade-induced energy inequality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Wang, Qiang & Li, Shuyu & Li, Rongrong & Ma, Minglu, 2018. "Forecasting U.S. shale gas monthly production using a hybrid ARIMA and metabolic nonlinear grey model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 378-387.
    10. Zeng, Huibin & Shao, Bilin & Dai, Hongbin & Yan, Yichuan & Tian, Ning, 2023. "Prediction of fluctuation loads based on GARCH family-CatBoost-CNNLSTM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    11. Cuilin Li & Ya-Juan Du & Qiang Ji & Jiang-bo Geng, 2019. "Multiscale Market Integration and Nonlinear Granger Causality between Natural Gas Futures and Physical Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Cai, Zhengyu & Maguire, Karen & Winters, John V., 2019. "Who benefits from local oil and gas employment? Labor market composition in the oil and gas industry in Texas and the rest of the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Xue-Ting Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Electric Output in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Journey to burning half of global coal: Trajectory and drivers of China׳s coal use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 341-346.
    15. Kuchler, Magdalena & Höök, Mikael, 2020. "Fractured visions: Anticipating (un)conventional natural gas in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.
    17. Yang, Jinghua & Wang, Min & Wu, Lei & Liu, Yanwei & Qiu, Shuxia & Xu, Peng, 2021. "A novel Monte Carlo simulation on gas flow in fractal shale reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Gómez-Bolaños, Efrén & Ellimäki, Pia & Hurtado-Torres, Nuria E. & Delgado-Márquez, Blanca L., 2022. "Internationalization and environmental innovation in the energy sector: Exploring the differences between multinational enterprises from emerging and developed countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Furlan, Claudia & Mortarino, Cinzia, 2018. "Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1879-1886.
    20. Yi Hu & Feng Liu & Yuqiang Hu & Yong Kang & Hao Chen & Jiawei Liu, 2019. "Propagation Characteristics of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Induced Fractures under True Tri-Axial Stresses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3326-:d:378194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.