IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7603-d678724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Pore Structure and Gas Content of the Lower Paleozoic Shale from the Upper Yangtze Plate, South China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Zou

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xianqing Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jizhen Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University), Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environment, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Huantong Li

    (College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Man Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Pei Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This study is predominantly about the differences in shale pore structure and the controlling factors of shale gas content between Lower Silurian and Lower Cambrian from the upper Yangtze plate, which are of great significance to the occurrence mechanism of shale gas. The field emission scanning electron microscopy combined with Particles ( Pores ) and Cracks Analysis System software, CO 2 /N 2 adsorption and the high-pressure mercury injection porosimetry, and methane adsorption were used to investigate characteristics of overall shale pore structure and organic matter pore, heterogeneity and gas content of the Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan Basin and northern Guizhou province from the upper Yangtze plate. Results show that porosity and the development of organic matter pores of the Lower Silurian are better than that of the Lower Cambrian, and there are four main types of pore, including interparticle pore, intraparticle pore, organic matter pore and micro-fracture. The micropores of the Lower Cambrian shale provide major pore volume and specific surface areas. In the Lower Silurian shale, there are mesopores besides micropores. Fractal dimensions representing pore structure complexity and heterogeneity gradually increase with the increase in pore volume and specific surface areas. There is a significant positive linear relationship between total organic carbon content and micropores volume and specific surface areas of the Lower Paleozoic shale, and the correlation of the Lower Silurian is more obvious than that of the Lower Cambrian. The plane porosity of organic matter increases with the increase in total organic carbon when it is less than 5%. The plane porosity of organic matter pores is positively correlated with clay minerals content and negatively correlated with brittle minerals content. The adsorption gas content of Lower Silurian and Lower Cambrian shale are 1.51–3.86 m 3 /t (average, 2.31 m 3 /t) and 0.35–2.38 m 3 /t (average, 1.36 m 3 /t). Total organic carbon, clay minerals and porosity are the main controlling factors for the differences in shale gas content between Lower Cambrian and Lower Silurian from the upper Yangtze plate. Probability entropy and organic matter plane porosity of the Lower Silurian are higher than those of Lower Cambrian shale, but form factor and roundness is smaller.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Zou & Xianqing Li & Jizhen Zhang & Huantong Li & Man Guo & Pei Zhao, 2021. "Characteristics of Pore Structure and Gas Content of the Lower Paleozoic Shale from the Upper Yangtze Plate, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7603-:d:678724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Rogers, Howard, 2014. "Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-28.
    2. Yuying Zhang & Shu Jiang & Zhiliang He & Yuchao Li & Dianshi Xiao & Guohui Chen & Jianhua Zhao, 2021. "Coupling between Source Rock and Reservoir of Shale Gas in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Li Liu & Shuheng Tang & Zhaodong Xi, 2019. "Total Organic Carbon Enrichment and Its Impact on Pore Characteristics: A Case Study from the Niutitang Formation Shales in Northern Guizhou," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Yuming Liu & Bo Shen & Zhiqiang Yang & Peiqiang Zhao, 2018. "Pore Structure Characterization and the Controlling Factors of the Bakken Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Yujie Yuan & Reza Rezaee, 2019. "Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Chen, Shangbin & Zhu, Yanming & Wang, Hongyan & Liu, Honglin & Wei, Wei & Fang, Junhua, 2011. "Shale gas reservoir characterisation: A typical case in the southern Sichuan Basin of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6609-6616.
    7. Bryan X. Medina-Rodriguez & Vladimir Alvarado, 2021. "Use of Gas Adsorption and Inversion Methods for Shale Pore Structure Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiang Liu & Jialong Li & Bing Liang & Weiji Sun & Jianjun Liu & Yun Lei, 2023. "Microscopic Flow of CO 2 in Complex Pore Structures: A Recent 10-Year Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Ping Gao & Xianming Xiao & Dongfeng Hu & Ruobing Liu & Yidong Cai & Tao Yuan & Guangming Meng, 2022. "Water Distribution in the Ultra-Deep Shale of the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formations from the Sichuan Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Lei Pan & Ling Chen & Peng Cheng & Haifeng Gai, 2022. "Methane Storage Capacity of Permian Shales with Type III Kerogen in the Lower Yangtze Area, Eastern China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Guangming Meng & Tengfei Li & Haifeng Gai & Xianming Xiao, 2022. "Pore Characteristics and Gas Preservation of the Lower Cambrian Shale in a Strongly Deformed Zone, Northern Chongqing, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Rezaee, 2022. "Editorial on Special Issues of Development of Unconventional Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Bryan X. Medina-Rodriguez & Vladimir Alvarado, 2021. "Use of Gas Adsorption and Inversion Methods for Shale Pore Structure Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Xiaoqi Wang & Yanming Zhu & Yang Wang, 2020. "Fractal Characteristics of Micro- and Mesopores in the Longmaxi Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Lenhard, L.G. & Andersen, S.M. & Coimbra-Araújo, C.H., 2018. "Energy-Environmental Implications Of Shale Gas Exploration In Paraná Hydrological Basin, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 56-69.
    5. Yunna, Wu & Kaifeng, Chen & Yisheng, Yang & Tiantian, Feng, 2015. "A system dynamics analysis of technology, cost and policy that affect the market competition of shale gas in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 235-243.
    6. Wang, Qiang & Zhan, Lina, 2019. "Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 353-364.
    7. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    8. Sharafian, Amir & Talebian, Hoda & Blomerus, Paul & Herrera, Omar & Mérida, Walter, 2017. "A review of liquefied natural gas refueling station designs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 503-513.
    9. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Chen, Junqing & Jiang, Fujie & Cong, Qi & Pang, Xiongqi & Ma, Kuiyou & Shi, Kanyuan & Pang, Bo & Chen, Dongxia & Pang, Hong & Yang, Xiaobin & Wang, Yuying & Li, Bingyao, 2023. "Adsorption characteristics of shale gas in organic–inorganic slit pores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    11. Zhiyao Zhang & Shang Xu & Qiyang Gou & Qiqi Li, 2022. "Reservoir Characteristics and Resource Potential of Marine Shale in South China: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Journey to burning half of global coal: Trajectory and drivers of China׳s coal use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 341-346.
    13. Sun, Wenjibin & Zuo, Yujun & Lin, Zhang & Wu, Zhonghu & Liu, Hao & Lin, Jianyun & Chen, Bin & Chen, Qinggang & Pan, Chao & Lan, Baofeng & Liu, Song, 2023. "Impact of tectonic deformation on shale pore structure using adsorption experiments and 3D digital core observation: A case study of the Niutitang Formation in Northern Guizhou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Kuchler, Magdalena & Höök, Mikael, 2020. "Fractured visions: Anticipating (un)conventional natural gas in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.
    16. Yuanyuan Tian & Qing Chen & Changhui Yan & Hongde Chen & Yanqing He & Yufeng He, 2022. "A New Adsorption Equation for Nano-Porous Shale Rocks and Its Application in Pore Size Distribution Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Gou, Qiyang & Xu, Shang & Hao, Fang & Yang, Feng & Shu, Zhiguo & Liu, Rui, 2021. "The effect of tectonic deformation and preservation condition on the shale pore structure using adsorption-based textural quantification and 3D image observation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    18. Ikonnikova, Svetlana & Gülen, Gürcan & Browning, John & Tinker, Scott W., 2015. "Profitability of shale gas drilling: A case study of the Fayetteville shale play," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 382-393.
    19. Reda Abdel Azim & Saad Alatefi & Ahmad Alkouh, 2023. "A Coupled Poro-Elastic Fluid Flow Simulator for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Rongrong Li & Xue-Ting Jiang, 2017. "Inequality of Carbon Intensity: Empirical Analysis of China 2000–2014," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7603-:d:678724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.