IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i22p4235-d284266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clean Poultry Energy System Design Based on Biomass Gasification Technology: Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Guiyan Zang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Jianan Zhang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Junxi Jia

    (College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Nathaniel Weger

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • Albert Ratner

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

Abstract

Despite growing attention has been paid to waste material gasification for high-efficiency energy conversion, the application of gasification technology in meat waste management is still limited. To fill this gap, this study designed two systems which evaluated the potential of using gasification technology to manage the poultry waste that has been exposed to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). Two systems are simulated by using Aspen plus combined with a one-dimensional kinetics control gasification model, and wood or dried poultry is selected as the feedstock for the gasifier. The results show that the energy efficiency of the poultry drying system (wood gasification) is 14.5%, which is 12% lower than that of the poultry gasification system when the poultry energy is accounted as energy input. Even though the economic analysis indicates the poultry elimination cost of the poultry gasification system is only 30 $/tonne lower than the poultry drying system, taking the absence of dried poultry burial into consideration, the poultry gasification system has development potentials. The sensitivity analysis shows that labor fee and variable factor has larger effects on the poultry elimination cost, while the uncertainty analysis determines the uncertainty level of the economic analysis results.

Suggested Citation

  • Guiyan Zang & Jianan Zhang & Junxi Jia & Nathaniel Weger & Albert Ratner, 2019. "Clean Poultry Energy System Design Based on Biomass Gasification Technology: Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4235-:d:284266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Fraia, S. & Massarotti, N. & Vanoli, L. & Costa, M., 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel cogeneration system for sewage sludge treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1560-1571.
    2. Ming-Chien Hsiao & Li-Wen Chang & Shuhn-Shyurng Hou, 2019. "Study of Solid Calcium Diglyceroxide for Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using a High Speed Homogenizer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    4. Jia, Junxi & Abudula, Abuliti & Wei, Liming & Sun, Baozhi & Shi, Yue, 2015. "Thermodynamic modeling of an integrated biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 400-410.
    5. Patra, Tapas Kumar & Sheth, Pratik N., 2015. "Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 583-593.
    6. Yong Huang & Yiling Wan & Shasha Liu & Yimeng Zhang & Huanhuan Ma & Shu Zhang & Jianbin Zhou, 2019. "A Downdraft Fixed-Bed Biomass Gasification System with Integrated Products of Electricity, Heat, and Biochar: The Key Features and Initial Commercial Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-9, August.
    7. Jia, Junxi & Shu, Lingyun & Zang, Guiyan & Xu, Lijun & Abudula, Abuliti & Ge, Kun, 2018. "Energy analysis and techno-economic assessment of a co-gasification of woody biomass and animal manure, solid oxide fuel cells and micro gas turbine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 750-761.
    8. Roy, Prokash C. & Datta, Amitava & Chakraborty, Niladri, 2010. "Assessment of cow dung as a supplementary fuel in a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 379-386.
    9. Nunes, L.J.R. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2016. "Biomass combustion systems: A review on the physical and chemical properties of the ashes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 235-242.
    10. Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa & Hedengren, John D. & Baxter, Larry L., 2016. "Dynamic optimization of a hybrid system of energy-storing cryogenic carbon capture and a baseline power generation unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 66-79.
    11. Fernand, Francois & Israel, Alvaro & Skjermo, Jorunn & Wichard, Thomas & Timmermans, Klaas R. & Golberg, Alexander, 2017. "Offshore macroalgae biomass for bioenergy production: Environmental aspects, technological achievements and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 35-45.
    12. Romanchenko, Dmytro & Odenberger, Mikael & Göransson, Lisa & Johnsson, Filip, 2017. "Impact of electricity price fluctuations on the operation of district heating systems: A case study of district heating in Göteborg, Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 16-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gheorghe Lazaroiu & Lucian Mihaescu & Rodica-Manuela Grigoriu & Gabriel-Paul Negreanu & Dorel Stoica, 2024. "Possibilities of Climate Control of Poultry Complexes through Co-Combustion of Poultry Waste–Solid Biomass for Agriculture in Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Xu, Siqi & Xing, Yangchuan, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of cathode material production using flame-assisted spray pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Long Zhang & Jingzheng Ren & Wuliyasu Bai, 2023. "A Review of Poultry Waste-to-Wealth: Technological Progress, Modeling and Simulation Studies, and Economic- Environmental and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    3. Habibollahzade, Ali & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Syngas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell functionality improvement through appropriate feedstock selection and multi-criteria optimization using Air/O2-enriched-air gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    4. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    5. Vera Marcantonio & Luisa Di Paola & Marcello De Falco & Mauro Capocelli, 2023. "Modeling of Biomass Gasification: From Thermodynamics to Process Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    6. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    7. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    8. Giulio Allesina & Simone Pedrazzi, 2021. "Barriers to Success: A Technical Review on the Limits and Possible Future Roles of Small Scale Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Yi Zhang & Guanmin Zhang & Min Wei & Zhenqiang Gao & Maocheng Tian & Fang He, 2019. "Comparisons of Acid and Water Solubilities of Rice Straw Ash Together with Its Major Ash-Forming Elements at Different Ashing Temperatures: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Yao, Xiwen & Zhao, Zhicheng & Li, Jishuo & Zhang, Bohan & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2020. "Experimental investigation of physicochemical and slagging characteristics of inorganic constituents in ash residues from gasification of different herbaceous biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    12. Milana Treshcheva & Irina Anikina & Vitaly Sergeev & Sergey Skulkin & Dmitry Treshchev, 2021. "Selection of Heat Pump Capacity Used at Thermal Power Plants under Electricity Market Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Karol Król & Dorota Nowak-Woźny, 2021. "Application of the Mechanical and Pressure Drop Tests to Determine the Sintering Temperature of Coal and Biomass Ash," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    15. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    16. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Roberta De Robbio, 2023. "Micro Gas Turbine Role in Distributed Generation with Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-37, January.
    18. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    19. Syed-Hassan, Syed Shatir A. & Wang, Yi & Hu, Song & Su, Sheng & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 888-913.
    20. Zhong, Shengyuan & Wang, Xiaoyuan & Zhao, Jun & Li, Wenjia & Li, Hao & Wang, Yongzhen & Deng, Shuai & Zhu, Jiebei, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning framework for dynamic pricing demand response of regenerative electric heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:22:p:4235-:d:284266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.