IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i7p1837-d157716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling of Tidal Turbine Performance and Structural Loads in a Velocity Shear Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Mujahid Badshah

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Sector H-10, Islamabad Capital Territory 44000, Pakistan)

  • Saeed Badshah

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Sector H-10, Islamabad Capital Territory 44000, Pakistan)

  • Kushsairy Kadir

    (Electric Engineering Section, UniKL British Malaysian Institute, Gombak 53100, Malaysia)

Abstract

Tidal Current Turbine (TCT) blades are highly flexible and undergo considerable deflection due to fluid interactions. Unlike Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) models Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) models are able to model this hydroelastic behavior. In this work a coupled modular FSI approach was adopted to develop an FSI model for the performance evaluation and structural load characterization of a TCT under uniform and profiled flow. Results indicate that for a uniform flow case the FSI model predicted the turbine power coefficient C P with an error of 4.8% when compared with experimental data. For the rigid blade Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) CFD model this error was 9.8%. The turbine blades were subjected to uniform stress and deformation during the rotation of the turbine in a uniform flow. However, for a profiled flow the stress and deformation at the turbine blades varied with the angular position of turbine blade, resulting in a 22.1% variation in stress during a rotation cycle. This variation in stress is quite significant and can have serious implications for the fatigue life of turbine blades.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujahid Badshah & Saeed Badshah & Kushsairy Kadir, 2018. "Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling of Tidal Turbine Performance and Structural Loads in a Velocity Shear Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1837-:d:157716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholls-Lee, R.F. & Turnock, S.R. & Boyd, S.W., 2013. "Application of bend-twist coupled blades for horizontal axis tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 541-550.
    2. Batten, W.M.J. & Bahaj, A.S. & Molland, A.F. & Chaplin, J.R., 2008. "The prediction of the hydrodynamic performance of marine current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1085-1096.
    3. Morris, C.E. & O'Doherty, D.M. & O'Doherty, T. & Mason-Jones, A., 2016. "Kinetic energy extraction of a tidal stream turbine and its sensitivity to structural stiffness attenuation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 30-39.
    4. Grogan, D.M. & Leen, S.B. & Kennedy, C.R. & Ó Brádaigh, C.M., 2013. "Design of composite tidal turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 151-162.
    5. Jo, Chul-Hee & Kim, Do-Youb & Rho, Yu-Ho & Lee, Kang-Hee & Johnstone, Cameron, 2013. "FSI analysis of deformation along offshore pile structure for tidal current power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 248-252.
    6. Mesfin Belayneh Ageze & Yefa Hu & Huachun Wu, 2017. "Comparative Study on Uni- and Bi-Directional Fluid Structure Coupling of Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Tian, Wenlong & VanZwieten, James H. & Pyakurel, Parakram & Li, Yanjun, 2016. "Influences of yaw angle and turbulence intensity on the performance of a 20 kW in-stream hydrokinetic turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 104-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuquan Zhang & Zhiqiang Liu & Chengyi Li & Xuemei Wang & Yuan Zheng & Zhi Zhang & Emmanuel Fernandez-Rodriguez & Rabea Jamil Mahfoud, 2022. "Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Structural Loads and Fatigue Life Analysis of Tidal Stream Turbine," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Zia Ur Rehman & Saeed Badshah & Amer Farhan Rafique & Mujahid Badshah & Sakhi Jan & Muhammad Amjad, 2021. "Effect of a Support Tower on the Performance and Wake of a Tidal Current Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Finnegan, William & Fagan, Edward & Flanagan, Tomas & Doyle, Adrian & Goggins, Jamie, 2020. "Operational fatigue loading on tidal turbine blades using computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 430-440.
    4. Mujahid Badshah & Saeed Badshah & James VanZwieten & Sakhi Jan & Muhammad Amir & Suheel Abdullah Malik, 2019. "Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling of Loads Variation and Fatigue Life of a Full-Scale Tidal Turbine under the Effect of Velocity Profile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Wang, Longyan & Xu, Jian & Wang, Zilu & Zhang, Bowen & Luo, Zhaohui & Yuan, Jianping & Tan, Andy C.C., 2023. "A novel cost-efficient deep learning framework for static fluid–structure interaction analysis of hydrofoil in tidal turbine morphing blade," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 367-384.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mujahid Badshah & Saeed Badshah & James VanZwieten & Sakhi Jan & Muhammad Amir & Suheel Abdullah Malik, 2019. "Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling of Loads Variation and Fatigue Life of a Full-Scale Tidal Turbine under the Effect of Velocity Profile," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Kennedy, Ciaran R. & Jaksic, Vesna & Leen, Sean B. & Brádaigh, Conchúr M.Ó., 2018. "Fatigue life of pitch- and stall-regulated composite tidal turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 688-699.
    3. Yuquan Zhang & Zhiqiang Liu & Chengyi Li & Xuemei Wang & Yuan Zheng & Zhi Zhang & Emmanuel Fernandez-Rodriguez & Rabea Jamil Mahfoud, 2022. "Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Structural Loads and Fatigue Life Analysis of Tidal Stream Turbine," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Modali, Pranav K. & Vinod, Ashwin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2021. "Towards a better understanding of yawed turbine wake for efficient wake steering in tidal arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 482-494.
    5. Wu, Baigong & Zhang, Xueming & Chen, Jianmei & Xu, Mingqi & Li, Shuangxin & Li, Guangzhe, 2013. "Design of high-efficient and universally applicable blades of tidal stream turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 187-194.
    6. Chen, Long & Lam, Wei-Haur, 2015. "A review of survivability and remedial actions of tidal current turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 891-900.
    7. Lewis, M.J. & Neill, S.P. & Hashemi, M.R. & Reza, M., 2014. "Realistic wave conditions and their influence on quantifying the tidal stream energy resource," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 495-508.
    8. Perez, Larissa & Cossu, Remo & Grinham, Alistair & Penesis, Irene, 2022. "Tidal turbine performance and loads for various hub heights and wave conditions using high-frequency field measurements and Blade Element Momentum theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1548-1560.
    9. Wang, Lin & Kolios, Athanasios & Cui, Lin & Sheng, Qihu, 2018. "Flexible multibody dynamics modelling of point-absorber wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 790-801.
    10. Li, Wei & Zhou, Hongbin & Liu, Hongwei & Lin, Yonggang & Xu, Quankun, 2016. "Review on the blade design technologies of tidal current turbine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 414-422.
    11. Nachtane, M. & Tarfaoui, M. & Goda, I. & Rouway, M., 2020. "A review on the technologies, design considerations and numerical models of tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1274-1288.
    12. Abutunis, A. & Taylor, G. & Fal, M. & Chandrashekhara, K., 2020. "Experimental evaluation of coaxial horizontal axis hydrokinetic composite turbine system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 232-245.
    13. Eva Segura & Rafael Morales & José A. Somolinos, 2017. "Cost Assessment Methodology and Economic Viability of Tidal Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Cleynen, Olivier & Engel, Sebastian & Hoerner, Stefan & Thévenin, Dominique, 2021. "Optimal design for the free-stream water wheel: A two-dimensional study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    15. Goundar, Jai N. & Ahmed, M. Rafiuddin, 2014. "Marine current energy resource assessment and design of a marine current turbine for Fiji," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 14-22.
    16. Mason-Jones, A. & O'Doherty, D.M. & Morris, C.E. & O'Doherty, T. & Byrne, C.B. & Prickett, P.W. & Grosvenor, R.I. & Owen, I. & Tedds, S. & Poole, R.J., 2012. "Non-dimensional scaling of tidal stream turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 820-829.
    17. Kamal, Md. Mustafa & Saini, R.P., 2023. "Performance investigations of hybrid hydrokinetic turbine rotor with different system and operating parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Li, Binghui & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Bane, John & He, Ruoying & Keeler, Andrew G. & Neary, Vincent S., 2017. "The economics of electricity generation from Gulf Stream currents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 649-658.
    19. Val, Dimitri V. & Chernin, Leon & Yurchenko, Daniil V., 2014. "Reliability analysis of rotor blades of tidal stream turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 26-33.
    20. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1837-:d:157716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.