IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i2p42-d1588176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Industrialization in China: A Spatial Panel Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhifeng Yang

    (School of International Economics and Trade, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, No. 995 Shangchuan Road, Shanghai 201209, China)

  • Sajid Anwar

    (School of Business and Creative Industries, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia)

  • Yuqi Yang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, No. 99, Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

This study employs spatial econometric techniques to examine the heterogeneous effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on industrialization across China’s four major regions—East, Central, West, and Northeast—using panel data from 31 provinces (1998–2016). Our findings reveal significant regional variations: FDI negatively impacts industrialization in the developed East, positively influences the less developed Northeast, and shows no significant effect in the Central and Western regions. To achieve balanced industrialization, policymakers should adopt spatially differentiated strategies. In the East, the focus should be on incentivizing high-value FDI in R&D and green technologies, while the Northeast could benefit from stronger economic partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). For the Central and Western regions, prioritizing infrastructure investments linked to the BRI and fostering cross-regional innovation corridors could attract labor-intensive FDI and promote technology diffusion, addressing regional disparities. The study’s robust spatial analysis offers valuable guidance for policymakers in crafting region-specific strategies to leverage FDI for balanced economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhifeng Yang & Sajid Anwar & Yuqi Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Industrialization in China: A Spatial Panel Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:42-:d:1588176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sami Ben Mim & Abir Hedi & Mohamed Sami Ben Ali, 2022. "Industrialization, FDI and absorptive capacities: evidence from African Countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1739-1766, August.
    2. Bailey, Nicholas & Warby, Brian, 2019. "Explaining the competition for FDI: Evidence from Costa Rica and cross-national industry-level FDI data," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 67-77.
    3. Echevarria, Cristina, 1997. "Changes in Sectoral Composition Associated with Economic Growth," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 38(2), pages 431-452, May.
    4. Lakhwinder Singh & Deepika Chawla, 2018. "Interconnection between R&D and Industrial Production Structure: The Experience of India," Millennial Asia, , vol. 9(3), pages 278-294, December.
    5. Manzoor Ahmad & Shoukat Iqbal Khattak & Shehzad Khan & Zia Ur Rahman, 2020. "Do aggregate domestic consumption spending & technological innovation affect industrialization in South Africa? An application of linear & non-linear ARDL models," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 44-65, January.
    6. Mingyong Hong & Wenjie Zhang, 2021. "Industrial structure upgrading, urbanization and urban-rural income disparity: evidence from China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(15), pages 1321-1326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia M. Puaschunder, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Market Disruption," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 01 JP, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    2. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    3. Douglas Gollin & Stephen L. Parente & Richard Rogerson, 2004. "Farm Work, Home Work, and International Productivity Differences," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 7(4), pages 827-850, October.
    4. Bjarne S. Jensen, 2004. "Pareto Efficiency, Relative Prices, and Solutions to CGE Models," DEGIT Conference Papers c009_006, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    5. Jaime Alonso-Carrera & Jordi Caballé & Xavier Raurich, 2011. "Sectoral composition and macroeconomic dynamics," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 869.11, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    6. Borgersen, Trond-Arne & King, Roswitha M., 2014. "Structural origins of debt-sustainability in mature and transition economies: Domar, Balassa–Samuelson and Maastricht," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 101-119.
    7. Elizabeth Caucutt & Thomas Cooley & Nezih Guner, 2013. "The farm, the city, and the emergence of social security," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, March.
    8. Michaud, Amanda & Rothert, Jacek, 2014. "Optimal borrowing constraints and growth in a small open economy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 326-340.
    9. Muro, Kazunobu, 2013. "A note on the three-sector Cobb–Douglas GDP function," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 18-21.
    10. Luigi BONATTI & Giulia FELICE, 2009. "Trade and growth in a two-country model with home production and uneven technological spillovers," Departmental Working Papers 2009-13, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    11. Been-Lon Chen & Shian-Yu Liao, 2015. "The Role of Agricultural Productivity on Structural Change," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 971-987, November.
    12. Dalila Nicet-Chenaf & Eric Rougier, 2009. "Human capital and structural change: how do they interact with each other in growth?," Post-Print hal-00389040, HAL.
    13. Usman Mehmood & Salman Tariq & Zia Ul-Haq & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Salah Kamel & Mohamed Elnaggar & Hasan Nawaz & Ammar Hameed & Shafqat Ali, 2022. "Can Financial Institutional Deepening and Renewable Energy Consumption Lower CO 2 Emissions in G-10 Countries: Fresh Evidence from Advanced Methodologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    14. L. Rachel Ngai & Christopher A. Pissarides, 2004. "Balanced Growth With Structural Change," CEP Discussion Papers dp0627, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    15. Sohail Abbas & Zulfiqar Ali Mayo, 2021. "Impact of temperature and rainfall on rice production in Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1706-1728, February.
    16. Berthold Herrendorf & Todd Schoellman, 2017. "Wages, Human Capital, and Structural Transformation," CESifo Working Paper Series 6426, CESifo.
    17. Yuki, Kazuhiro, 2008. "Sectoral Shift, Wealth Distribution, And Development," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 527-559, September.
    18. Jeremy Greenwood & Ananth Seshadri, 2002. "The U.S. Demographic Transition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 153-159, May.
    19. Fedderke, Johannes W., 2018. "Exploring unbalanced growth: Understanding the sectoral structure of the South African economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 177-189.
    20. Mao, Rui & Xu, Jianwei & Zou, Jingxian, 2018. "The labor force age structure and employment structure of the modern sector," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:42-:d:1588176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.