IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v13y2025i3p37-d1754036.html

Re-Examining Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Zaka Ratsimalahelo

    (CRESE (UR 3190), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, F-25000 Besançon, France)

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of constructing confidence intervals (CIs) for nonlinear functions of parameters, particularly ratios of parameters a common issue in econometrics and statistics. Classical CIs (such as the Delta method and the Fieller method) often fail in small samples due to biased parameter estimators and skewed distributions. We extended the Delta method using the Edgeworth expansion to correct for skewness due to estimated parameters having non-normal and asymmetric distributions. The resulting bias-corrected confidence intervals are easy to compute and have a good coverage probability that converges to the nominal level at a rate of O ( n − 1 / 2 ) where n is the sample size. We also propose bias-corrected estimators based on second-order Taylor expansions, aligning with the “almost unbiased ratio estimator” . We then correct the CIs according to the Delta method and the Edgeworth expansion. Thus, our new methods for constructing confidence intervals account for both the bias and the skewness of the distribution of the nonlinear functions of parameters. We conduct a simulation study to compare the confidence intervals of our new methods with the two classical methods. The methods evaluated include Fieller’s interval, Delta with and without the bias correction interval, and Edgeworth expansion with and without the bias correction interval. The results show that our new methods with bias correction generally have good performance in terms of controlling the coverage probabilities and average length intervals. They should be recommended for constructing confidence intervals for nonlinear functions of estimated parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaka Ratsimalahelo, 2025. "Re-Examining Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Parameters," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:37-:d:1754036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/3/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/3/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woglom, Geoffrey, 2001. "More Results on the Exact Small Sample Properties of the Instrumental Variable Estimator," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1381-1389, September.
    2. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    3. Hirschberg, Joe & Lye, Jenny, 2010. "A Geometric Comparison of the Delta and Fieller Confidence Intervals," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(3), pages 234-241.
    4. Jean-Marie Dufour & Emmanuel Flachaire & Lynda Khalaf & Abdallah Zalghout, 2024. "Identification-robust methods for comparing inequality with an application to regional disparities," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 22(2), pages 433-452, June.
    5. Krinsky, Itzhak & Robb, A Leslie, 1990. "On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities: A Correction," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(1), pages 189-190, February.
    6. Lukas Leitner, 2024. "Imprecision in the Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Subjective Well-Being Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-40, October.
    7. Peng Wang & Siqi Xu & Yi‐Xin Wang & Baolin Wu & Wing Kam Fung & Guimin Gao & Zhijiang Liang & Nianjun Liu, 2021. "Penalized Fieller's confidence interval for the ratio of bivariate normal means," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1355-1368, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carson, Richard T. & Czajkowski, Mikołaj, 2019. "A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 57-61.
    2. Zaka Ratsimalahelo, 2024. "Re examining confidence intervals for ratios of parameters," Working Papers 2024-20, CRESE.
    3. Zaka Ratsimalahelo, 2025. "Re examining confidence intervals for ratios of parameters," Working Papers 2025-04, CRESE.
    4. Aristide Houndetoungan & Abdoul Haki Maoude, 2024. "Inference for Two-Stage Extremum Estimators," Papers 2402.05030, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    5. Lukas Leitner, 2024. "Imprecision in the Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Subjective Well-Being Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-40, October.
    6. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo & Scaccia, Luisa, 2015. "On finite sample performance of confidence intervals methods for willingness to pay measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-192.
    7. Ortega, David L. & Wang, H. Holly & Wu, Laping & Hong, Soo Jeong, 2015. "Retail channel and consumer demand for food quality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 359-366.
    8. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    9. Choi, Andy S., 2013. "Nonmarket values of major resources in the Korean DMZ areas: A test of distance decay," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 97-107.
    10. Zawojska, Ewa & Czajkowski, Mikotaj, "undated". "Are preferences stated in web vs. personal interviews different? A comparison of willingness to pay results for a large multi-country study of the Baltic Sea eutrophication reduction," Annual Meeting, 2017, June 18-21, Montreal, Canada 258604, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
    11. Brox, James A. & Fader, Christina, 1996. "Production elasticity differences between just-in-time and non-just-in-time users in the automotive parts industry," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 77-90.
    12. Carmelo León & Francisco Vázquez-Polo & Roberto González, 2003. "Elicitation of Expert Opinion in Benefit Transfer of Environmental Goods," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 26(2), pages 199-210, October.
    13. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Tyurina, Elena & Nagapetyan, Artur, 2022. "The economic value of the Glass Beach: Contingent valuation and life satisfaction approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Khan, Mohammed Tajuddin & Kishore, Avinash & Joshi, Pramod K., 2016. "Gender dimensions on farmers’ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India," IFPRI discussion papers 1550, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Caparros, Alejandro & Cerda, Emilio & Ovando, P. & Campos, Pablo, 2007. "Carbon Sequestration with Reforestations and Biodiversity-Scenic Values," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 9323, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Tuan, Tran Huu & Navrud, Stale, 2009. "Applying the dissonance-minimising format to value cultural heritage in developing countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-17.
    17. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Parsons, George R. & Jakus, Paul M. & Tomasi, Ted, 1999. "A Comparison of Welfare Estimates from Four Models for Linking Seasonal Recreational Trips to Multinomial Logit Models of Site Choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 143-157, September.
    19. Maureen Cropper & Yi Jiang & Anna Alberini & Patrick Baur, 2014. "Getting Cars Off the Road: The Cost-Effectiveness of an Episodic Pollution Control Program," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(1), pages 117-143, January.
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:sw6kd_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Roy Brouwer & Solomon Tarfasa, 2020. "Testing hypothetical bias in a framed field experiment," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(3), pages 343-357, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:37-:d:1754036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.