IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v8y2023i9p137-d1229018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Evaluating Renewable Energy for Decision-Making Integrating a Hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS Approach: A Case Study in Valle del Cauca, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Mateo Barrera-Zapata

    (Research Group Percepción y Sistemas Inteligentes (PSI), School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 #100-00, Cali 760032, Colombia)

  • Fabian Zuñiga-Cortes

    (Research Group Percepción y Sistemas Inteligentes (PSI), School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 #100-00, Cali 760032, Colombia)

  • Eduardo Caicedo-Bravo

    (Research Group Percepción y Sistemas Inteligentes (PSI), School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 #100-00, Cali 760032, Colombia)

Abstract

At present, the energy landscape of many countries faces transformational challenges driven by sustainable development objectives, supported by the implementation of clean technologies, such as renewable energy sources, to meet the flexibility and diversification needs of the traditional energy mix. However, integrating these technologies requires a thorough study of the context in which they are developed. Furthermore, it is necessary to carry out an analysis from a sustainable approach that quantifies the impact of proposals on multiple objectives established by stakeholders. This article presents a framework for analysis that integrates a method for evaluating the technical feasibility of resources for photovoltaic solar, wind, small hydroelectric power, and biomass generation. These resources are used to construct a set of alternatives and are evaluated using a hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS approach. FAHP-TOPSIS is used as a comparison technique among a collection of technical, economic, and environmental criteria, ranking the alternatives considering their level of trade-off between criteria. The results of a case study in Valle del Cauca (Colombia) offer a wide range of alternatives and indicate a combination of 50% biomass, and 50% solar as the best, assisting in decision-making for the correct use of available resources and maximizing the benefits for stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateo Barrera-Zapata & Fabian Zuñiga-Cortes & Eduardo Caicedo-Bravo, 2023. "A Framework for Evaluating Renewable Energy for Decision-Making Integrating a Hybrid FAHP-TOPSIS Approach: A Case Study in Valle del Cauca, Colombia," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:9:p:137-:d:1229018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/9/137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/9/137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qaiser, Imran, 2022. "A comparison of renewable and sustainable energy sector of the South Asian countries: An application of SWOT methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 417-425.
    2. Yilan, Gülşah & Kadirgan, M.A. Neşet & Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen A., 2020. "Analysis of electricity generation options for sustainable energy decision making: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 519-529.
    3. Ali Mostafaeipour & Ali Sadeghi Sedeh & Shahariar Chowdhury & Kuaanan Techato, 2020. "Ranking Potential Renewable Energy Systems to Power On-Farm Fertilizer Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Dionysios Pramangioulis & Konstantinos Atsonios & Nikos Nikolopoulos & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Panagiotis Grammelis & Emmanuel Kakaras, 2019. "A Methodology for Determination and Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Smart Grids Development in Island Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Singh, Shweta & Upadhyay, Surya Prakash & Powar, Satvasheel, 2022. "Developing an integrated social, economic, environmental, and technical analysis model for sustainable development using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    6. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Ramchandra Bhandari & Benjamin Eduardo Arce & Vittorio Sessa & Rabani Adamou, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Şengül, Ümran & Eren, Miraç & Eslamian Shiraz, Seyedhadi & Gezder, Volkan & Şengül, Ahmet Bilal, 2015. "Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 617-625.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busola D. Akintayo & Oluwafemi E. Ige & Olubayo M. Babatunde & Oludolapo A. Olanrewaju, 2023. "Evaluation and Prioritization of Power-Generating Systems Using a Life Cycle Assessment and a Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    3. Gezen, Mesliha & Karaaslan, Abdulkerim, 2022. "Energy planning based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a goal programming under fuzzy multi-objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    4. Ramchandra Bhandari & Benjamin Eduardo Arce & Vittorio Sessa & Rabani Adamou, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Karaaslan, Abdulkerim & Gezen, Mesliha, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey by integer multi-objective selection problem with interval coefficient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 842-854.
    6. Mateusz Piwowarski & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2021. "The Problem of Non-Typical Objects in the Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of the Level of Renewable Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Bilgili, Faik & Zarali, Fulya & Ilgün, Miraç Fatih & Dumrul, Cüneyt & Dumrul, Yasemin, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for sustainable development in Turkey using ‌intuitionistic‌ ‌fuzzy‌-TOPSIS method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1443-1458.
    8. Horasan, Muhammed Bilal & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk, 2022. "A multi-objective decision-making model for renewable energy planning: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 484-504.
    9. Yechennan Peng & Hossein Azadi & Liang (Emlyn) Yang & Jürgen Scheffran & Ping Jiang, 2022. "Assessing the Siting Potential of Low-Carbon Energy Power Plants in the Yangtze River Delta: A GIS-Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Paula Donaduzzi Rigo & Graciele Rediske & Carmen Brum Rosa & Natália Gava Gastaldo & Leandro Michels & Alvaro Luiz Neuenfeldt Júnior & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, 2020. "Renewable Energy Problems: Exploring the Methods to Support the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Bączkiewicz, Aleksandra & Sałabun, Wojciech, 2022. "New multi-criteria method for evaluation of sustainable RES management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Aldona Kluczek & Patrycja Żegleń & Daniela Matušíková, 2021. "The Use of Prospect Theory for Energy Sustainable Industry 4.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Dalal Aassouli & Ayodele Akande & Ray Jureidini, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Food Governance and the Alignment of Food Security Policies to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of OIC Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Marcin Rabe & Dalia Streimikiene & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "The Concept of Risk and Possibilities of Application of Mathematical Methods in Supporting Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    19. Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain & Ringler, Claudia & Al-Riffai, Perrihan & Eldidi, Hagar & Breisinger, Clemens & Wiebelt, Manfred, 2019. "Long-term optimization of Egypt’s power sector: Policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1063-1073.
    20. Xiaoye Jin & Meiying Li & Fansheng Meng, 2019. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the New Energy Power Generation Development at the Regional Level: An Empirical Analysis from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:9:p:137-:d:1229018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.