IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v7y2025i1p21-d1606581.html

Financial Feasibility of Bioenergy Products Based on Forest Residues: Case of Costa Rica Northern

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Valverde

    (Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Victoria 631, Concepción 4191996, Región del Biobío, Chile
    Laboratory of Forest Ecophysiology and Ecosystem Applications (ECOPLANT), Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago 159-7050, Costa Rica)

  • Dagoberto Arias-Aguilar

    (Laboratory of Forest Ecophysiology and Ecosystem Applications (ECOPLANT), Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago 159-7050, Costa Rica)

  • Rooel Campos-Rodríguez

    (Agribusiness Engineering School, Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago 159-7050, Costa Rica)

Abstract

This research identified the optimal scenarios to produce three bioenergy outputs: dual generation (electricity and heat), electricity, and heat in two regions located in the northern part of Costa Rica. Two biomass conversion technologies—boilers and gasification—with 2, 5, and 10 MW production capacities were assessed to ascertain the most suitable technology-capacity pairing for each bioproduct. To this end, a comprehensive financial model was developed to maximize the net present value. Following this, the equilibrium point for biomass supply and demand was ascertained, alongside estimations of the associated costs and energy utility. The findings indicated that the three bioenergy products could be completed within the local energy market at prices below 0.14 USD/kWh, with maximum supply distances of 90 km. The boiler and turbine technology proved most suitable for dual and electricity generation, with capacities ranging between 2 MW and 5 MW, where differentiation was influenced by biomass transportation. Furthermore, heat generation demonstrated financial viability at a capacity of 2 MW. In the evaluation of supply-demand break-even points, a maximum benefit of 26% was observed, with dual production yielding the highest benefits and heat production being the least favorable option due to the costs linked to biomass transportation and the low efficiency of energy transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Valverde & Dagoberto Arias-Aguilar & Rooel Campos-Rodríguez, 2025. "Financial Feasibility of Bioenergy Products Based on Forest Residues: Case of Costa Rica Northern," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:21-:d:1606581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/1/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/1/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andre Faaij, 2006. "Modern Biomass Conversion Technologies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 335-367, March.
    2. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh & Griess, Verena C., 2018. "Integrated strategic and tactical optimization of forest-based biomass supply chains to consider medium-term supply and demand variations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 626-638.
    3. Frombo, Francesco & Minciardi, Riccardo & Robba, Michela & Sacile, Roberto, 2009. "A decision support system for planning biomass-based energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 362-369.
    4. Trømborg, Erik & Havskjold, Monica & Lislebø, Ole & Rørstad, Per Kristian, 2011. "Projecting demand and supply of forest biomass for heating in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7049-7058.
    5. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O'Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2020. "A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. M. Jean Blair & Bruno Gagnon & Andrew Klain & Biljana Kulišić, 2021. "Contribution of Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy to Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2020. "Hybrid optimization-simulation for integrated planning of bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Mario Martín-Gamboa & Paula Quinteiro & Ana Cláudia Dias & Diego Iribarren, 2021. "Comparative Social Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biomass-to-Electricity Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleonora Santos, 2025. "Sustainable Scaling in Forest-Based Circular Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henrique Piqueiro & Reinaldo Gomes & Romão Santos & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "Managing Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain: A Decision Support System Based on Simulation/Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Li, Zhengbing & Liang, Yongtu & Ni, Weilong & Liao, Qi & Xu, Ning & Li, Lichao & Zheng, Jianqin & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Pipesharing: economic-environmental benefits from transporting biofuels through multiproduct pipelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Yılmaz, Sebnem & Selim, Hasan, 2013. "A review on the methods for biomass to energy conversion systems design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 420-430.
    5. Alfredo Višković & Vladimir Franki & Angela Bašić-Šiško, 2022. "City-Level Transition to Low-Carbon Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Abbas, Shahbaz & Chiang Hsieh, Lin-Han & Techato, Kuaanan, 2021. "Supply chain integrated decision model in order to synergize the energy system of textile industry from its resource waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Arsani Alina & Stefan George, 2024. "Energy Transition and European Sub-Models. Restructuring EU Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 86-101.
    8. repec:hig:fsight:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:6-17 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Teng, Sin Yong & Lam, Hon Loong & Lim, Chun Hsion & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Stochastic techno-economic evaluation model for biomass supply chain: A biomass gasification case study with supply chain uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Sandberg, Eli & Sneum, Daniel Møller & Trømborg, Erik, 2018. "Framework conditions for Nordic district heating - Similarities and differences, and why Norway sticks out," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 105-119.
    11. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2023. "Investigating the Potential of Nuclear Energy in Achieving a Carbon-Free Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Chehrmonavari, Hamed & Kakaee, Amirhasan & Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Desideri, Umberto & Tsatsaronis, George & Floerchinger, Gus & Braun, Robert & Paykani, Amin, 2023. "Hybridizing solid oxide fuel cells with internal combustion engines for power and propulsion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Suckling, Ian D. & de Miguel Mercader, Ferran & Monge, Juan J. & Wakelin, Steve J. & Hall, Peter W. & Bennett, Paul J. & Höck, Barbara & Samsatli, Nouri J. & Samsatli, Sheila & Fahmy, Muthasim, 2022. "Best options for large-scale production of liquid biofuels by value chain modelling: A New Zealand case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    16. Muhammad Shajih Zafar & Pejman Salimi & Marco Ricci & Jasim Zia & Remo Proietti Zaccaria, 2025. "Environmentally Sustainable Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries Derived from Cattle Bone Waste: A Full-Cell Analysis with a LiFePO 4 Cathode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Mohammed, Y.S. & Mokhtar, A.S. & Bashir, N. & Saidur, R., 2013. "An overview of agricultural biomass for decentralized rural energy in Ghana," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 15-25.
    18. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Rasinmäki, Jussi & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2014. "Methods to optimise the design and management of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 657-670.
    19. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Tomas Karpavicius, 2026. "Energy policy and climate change mitigation at national level in the European Union: A case study of Lithuania," Energy & Environment, , vol. 37(2), pages 656-680, March.
    20. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Evina Katsou, 2024. "A Review Analysis of Electricity Generation Studies with Social Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    21. Verdone, Alessio & Scardapane, Simone & Panella, Massimo, 2024. "Explainable Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for multi-site photovoltaic energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:21-:d:1606581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.