IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v4y2022i2p32-541d830722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sustainable Biogas Production from Co-Digestion of Jatropha De-Oiled Cake and Cattle Dung Using Floating Drum Type Digester under Psychrophilic and Mesophilic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Kumar Sharma

    (Department of Chemistry, Applied Sciences Cluster and Centre for Alternate Energy Research (CAER), School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India)

  • Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo

    (Department of Farm Machinery & Power, Orissa University of Agriculture Technology (OUAT), Bhubaneswar 751003, India)

  • Mainak Mukherjee

    (LRGP, CNRS-Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France
    Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India)

  • Alok Patel

    (Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

Abstract

Biodiesel is an emerging alternative fuel that is generally made from edible and non-edible oilseed crops. Jatropha curcus has a high potential for producing biodiesel, which yields 25–35% oil along with 75–65% solid byproduct, generally called a de-oiled cake. The present manuscript deals with the co-digestion of Jatropha de-oiled cake along with cattle dung (1:1 ratio) for biogas production in a floating-type biogas digester. The experimental study was carried out in a modified KVIC biogas plant of 6 cubic meter capacity for 60 days’ retention time under psychrophilic and mesophilic temperature conditions. During all the experiments, the total solid content of the slurry was maintained fixed at 10–12% by mixing 10 kg Jatropha de-oiled cake and 10 kg cattle dung with 80 kg water. The experimental results showed that the average specific biogas production of Jatropha de-oiled cake and cattle dung slurry was observed to be 0.216 m 3 /kg TS , 0.252 m 3 /kg VS and 0.287 m 3 /kg TS , 0.335 m 3 /kg VS , respectively, under the aforementioned conditions. Moreover, the biogas methane concentration was observed to be 62.33% to 69.16% under mesophilic temperature conditions compared to the psychrophilic temperature conditions, 65.21% to 69.15%, respectively. Furthermore, the average total volatile solids mass removal efficiency of feeding material in the abovementioned process was 7% higher under mesophilic temperature conditions than psychrophilic temperature conditions. Additionally, the results indicated that a total 588.8 kg of input volatile solids produced a total of 7306.56 MJ/m 3 and 5177.88 MJ/m 3 energy in 60 days under psychrophilic and mesophilic temperature conditions. On the basis of the results, it is concluded that Jatropha de-oiled cake may be a superior solution for improving biogas quality and composition as well as a value-added product, i.e., organic manure.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Kumar Sharma & Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo & Mainak Mukherjee & Alok Patel, 2022. "Assessment of Sustainable Biogas Production from Co-Digestion of Jatropha De-Oiled Cake and Cattle Dung Using Floating Drum Type Digester under Psychrophilic and Mesophilic Conditions," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:32-541:d:830722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/2/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/2/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Nsair & Senem Onen Cinar & Ayah Alassali & Hani Abu Qdais & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Amit Kumar Sharma & Pankaj Kumar Sharma & Venkateswarlu Chintala & Narayan Khatri & Alok Patel, 2020. "Environment-Friendly Biodiesel/Diesel Blends for Improving the Exhaust Emission and Engine Performance to Reduce the Pollutants Emitted from Transportation Fleets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    5. Gupta, Aditi & Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati & Vijay, V.K., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1514-1521.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz, 2021. "The Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Methanogenesis in the Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Pan, Junting & Peng, Wanxi & Wang, Yajing & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    3. Gupta, Aditi & Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati & Vijay, V.K., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1514-1521.
    4. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    7. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Gabriel Filipczak & Barbara Dybek & Grzegorz Wałowski, 2023. "Biogas Production Depending on the Substrate Used: A Review and Evaluation Study—European Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Gabriele Di Giacomo, 2021. "Material and Energy Recovery from the Final Disposal of Organic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-2, December.
    9. Senem Onen Cinar & Abdullah Nsair & Nils Wieczorek & Kerstin Kuchta, 2022. "Long-Term Assessment of Temperature Management in an Industrial Scale Biogas Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Barik, Debabrata & Murugan, S., 2014. "Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 760-771.
    11. Sambusiti, C. & Ficara, E. & Malpei, F. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrère, H., 2013. "Effect of sodium hydroxide pretreatment on physical, chemical characteristics and methane production of five varieties of sorghum," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 449-456.
    12. Yanara Alessandra Santana Moura & Daniela de Araújo Viana-Marques & Ana Lúcia Figueiredo Porto & Raquel Pedrosa Bezerra & Attilio Converti, 2020. "Pigments Production, Growth Kinetics, and Bioenergetic Patterns in Dunaliella tertiolecta (Chlorophyta) in Response to Different Culture Media," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Siqueira, J.C. & Braga, M.Q. & Ázara, M.S. & Garcia, K.J. & Alencar, S.N.M. & Ramos, T.S. & Siniscalchi, L.A.B. & Assemany, P.P. & Ensinas, A.V., 2022. "Recovery of vinasse with combined microalgae cultivation in a conceptual energy-efficient industrial plant: Analysis of related process considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Trivedi, Abhinav & Verma, Amit Ranjan & Kaur, Supreet & Jha, Bhaskar & Vijay, Vandit & Chandra, Ram & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Tiwari, Ratnesh & Hariprasad, P. & Prasad, Rajendra, 2017. "Sustainable bio-energy production models for eradicating open field burning of paddy straw in Punjab, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 310-317.
    15. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    16. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T. & Kumar, R., 2012. "Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 273-282.
    17. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. Navarro-Pineda, Freddy S. & Baz-Rodríguez, Sergio A. & Handler, Robert & Sacramento-Rivero, Julio C., 2016. "Advances on the processing of Jatropha curcas towards a whole-crop biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 247-269.
    19. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Hasfalina Che Man & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Recovery Using Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs): Strategies and Achievements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Pascual, Celia & Cantera, Sara & Muñoz, Raúl & Lebrero, Raquel, 2021. "Siloxanes removal in a two-phase partitioning biotrickling filter: Influence of the EBRT and the organic phase," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 52-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:32-541:d:830722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.