IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i12p1244-d1673943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) as a Feedstock for Methane Production in Northern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Eglė Norkevičienė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Kęstutis Venslauskas

    (Faculty of Engineering, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Kęstutis Navickas

    (Faculty of Engineering, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Carlo Greco

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Kristina Amalevičiūtė-Volungė

    (Lithuanian Agricultural Advisory Service, Stoties St. 5, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Vilma Kemešytė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Aurelija Liatukienė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Giedrius Petrauskas

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Bronislava Butkutė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

Abstract

Interest in using warm-season grasses, including switchgrass (SG) ( Panicum virgatum L.), as a bioenergy crop has increased in Europe. This study evaluated the effects of harvesting regimes with two cuts per year on the productivity, chemical composition and biochemical methane potential of the SG cultivars ‘Dacotah’, ‘Foresburg’ and ‘Cave in Rock’ in environments with cool and moderate climates in Europe with minimal fertilizer application. The results of two harvest years suggest that the biomass yield, chemical composition and energy potential depend on the grass cultivars and harvesting time. Significant effects ( p < 0.05) of the harvest date and cultivar were observed for most of the measured parameters for biomass and silage quality. All three SG cultivars harvested on August 8 produced the lowest ( p < 0.05) volume of methane per kg of biomass (181–202 normal litres (NL) per kg −1 volatile solids (VS)) compared to the biomass of the respective cultivar harvested on 14 July (287–308 NL kg −1 VS) or on October 3, as regrowth after the first cut made in mid-July (274–307 NL kg −1 VS). The stands of all three SG cultivars, when the first harvest was completed in mid-July, achieved a higher annual area-specific methane yield than those harvested first in August (1128–1900 Nm 3 ha −1 and 888–1332 Nm 3 ha −1 , respectively). Depending on the harvest regime and cultivar, the annual gross energy presented as a lower heating value varied from 31.8 GJ ha −1 to 68.0 GJ ha −1 . It is concluded that SG growing under the cool temperate climate of Northern Europe could be an interesting alternative crop for methane production. Our study proves that the cultivar choice also plays an important role.

Suggested Citation

  • Eglė Norkevičienė & Kęstutis Venslauskas & Kęstutis Navickas & Carlo Greco & Kristina Amalevičiūtė-Volungė & Vilma Kemešytė & Aurelija Liatukienė & Giedrius Petrauskas & Bronislava Butkutė, 2025. "Evaluating Switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) as a Feedstock for Methane Production in Northern Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1244-:d:1673943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smeets, Edward M.W. & Lewandowski, Iris M. & Faaij, André P.C., 2009. "The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1230-1245, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Batidzirai, B. & Smeets, E.M.W. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Harmonising bioenergy resource potentials—Methodological lessons from review of state of the art bioenergy potential assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6598-6630.
    2. Vyn, Richard J. & Virani, Tasneem & Deen, Bill, 2012. "Examining the economic feasibility of miscanthus in Ontario: An application to the greenhouse industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 669-676.
    3. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Hou, Yunbing & Li, Hui & Wang, Pengtao, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Miranowski, John & Rosburg, Alicia, 2010. "An Economic Breakeven Model of Cellulosic Feedstock Production and Ethanol Conversion with Implied Carbon Pricing," Staff General Research Papers Archive 13166, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Rahman, Md. Mizanur & B. Mostafiz, Suraiya & Paatero, Jukka V. & Lahdelma, Risto, 2014. "Extension of energy crops on surplus agricultural lands: A potentially viable option in developing countries while fossil fuel reserves are diminishing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 108-119.
    6. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. van der Hilst, F. & Lesschen, J.P. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Riksen, M. & Verweij, P.A. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Spatial variation of environmental impacts of regional biomass chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2053-2069.
    8. van der Hilst, F. & Dornburg, V. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Elbersen, B. & Graves, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Elbersen, H.W. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2010. "Potential, spatial distribution and economic performance of regional biomass chains: The North of the Netherlands as example," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 403-417, September.
    9. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    10. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    11. Yanmei Liu & Astley Hastings & Shaolin Chen & André Faaij, 2023. "A Spatially Explicit Evaluation of the Economic Performance of a Perennial Energy Crop on the Marginal Land of the Loess Plateau and China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Hoefnagels, Ric & Resch, Gustav & Junginger, Martin & Faaij, André, 2014. "International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 139-157.
    13. Xue, Shuai & Kalinina, Olena & Lewandowski, Iris, 2015. "Present and future options for Miscanthus propagation and establishment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1233-1246.
    14. Perrin, Aurelie & Wohlfahrt, Julie & Morandi, Fabiana & Østergård, Hanne & Flatberg, Truls & De La Rua, Cristina & Bjørkvoll, Thor & Gabrielle, Benoit, 2017. "Integrated design and sustainable assessment of innovative biomass supply chains: A case-study on miscanthus in France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 66-77.
    15. Ferrarini, Andrea & Serra, Paolo & Almagro, María & Trevisan, Marco & Amaducci, Stefano, 2017. "Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 277-290.
    16. Hoefnagels, Ric & Smeets, Edward & Faaij, André, 2010. "Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1661-1694, September.
    17. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping, 2018. "Biomass supply contract pricing and environmental policy analysis: A simulation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 557-566.
    18. Pulighe, Giuseppe & Bonati, Guido & Colangeli, Marco & Morese, Maria Michela & Traverso, Lorenzo & Lupia, Flavio & Khawaja, Cosette & Janssen, Rainer & Fava, Francesco, 2019. "Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-70.
    19. van Eijck, Janske & Batidzirai, Bothwell & Faaij, André, 2014. "Current and future economic performance of first and second generation biofuels in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 115-141.
    20. Zhang, Yong & Bao, Xiangtai & Ren, Gang & Cai, Xiaohua & Li, Jian, 2012. "Analysing the status, obstacles and recommendations for WCOs of restaurants as biodiesel feedstocks in China from supply chain’ perspectives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 20-37.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1244-:d:1673943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.