IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1127-d1662849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Agricultural Futures Return Prediction: Insights from Rolling VMD, Economic Factors, and Mixed Ensembles

Author

Listed:
  • Yiling Ye

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiaowen Zhuang

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Cai Yi

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Dinggao Liu

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Zhenpeng Tang

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

The prediction of agricultural commodity futures returns is crucial for understanding global economic trends, alleviating inflationary pressures, and optimizing investment portfolios. However, current research that uses full-sample decomposition to predict agricultural futures returns suffers from data leakage, and the resulting forecast bias leads to overly optimistic outcomes. Additionally, previous studies have lacked a comprehensive consideration of key economic variables that influence agricultural prices. To address these issues, this study proposes the “Rolling VMD-LASSO-Mixed Ensemble” forecasting framework and compares its performance with “Rolling VMD” against univariate models, “Rolling VMD-LASSO” against “Rolling VMD”, and “Rolling VMD-LASSO-Mixed Ensemble” against “Rolling VMD-LASSO”. Empirical results show that, on average, “Rolling VMD” improved MSE, MAE, Theil U, ARV, and DA by 3.05%, 1.09%, 1.52%, 2.96%, and 11.11%, respectively, compared to univariate models. “Rolling VMD-LASSO” improved these five indicators by 2.11%, 1.15%, 1.09%, 2.13%, and 1.00% over “Rolling VMD”. The decision tree-based “Rolling VMD-LASSO-Mixed Ensemble” outperformed “Rolling VMD-LASSO” by 1.98%, 0.96%, 1.28%, 2.55%, and 4.18% in the five metrics. Furthermore, the daily average return, maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and Calmar ratio based on prediction results also show that “Rolling VMD” outperforms univariate forecasting, “Rolling VMD-LASSO” outperforms “Rolling VMD”, and “Rolling VMD-LASSO-Mixed Ensemble” outperforms “Rolling VMD-LASSO”. This study provides a more accurate and robust forecasting framework for the global agricultural futures market, offering significant practical value for investor risk management and policymakers in stabilizing prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiling Ye & Xiaowen Zhuang & Cai Yi & Dinggao Liu & Zhenpeng Tang, 2025. "Enhancing Agricultural Futures Return Prediction: Insights from Rolling VMD, Economic Factors, and Mixed Ensembles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1127-:d:1662849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rad, Hossein & Low, Rand Kwong Yew & Miffre, Joëlle & Faff, Robert, 2022. "The strategic allocation to style-integrated portfolios of commodity futures," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    2. Tim Bollerslev & Benjamin Hood & John Huss & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2018. "Risk Everywhere: Modeling and Managing Volatility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(7), pages 2729-2773.
    3. Jian Li & Jean-Paul Chavas & Xiaoli L. Etienne & Chongguang Li, 2017. "Commodity price bubbles and macroeconomics: evidence from the Chinese agricultural markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(6), pages 755-768, November.
    4. Xu, Kunliang & Niu, Hongli, 2023. "Denoising or distortion: Does decomposition-reconstruction modeling paradigm provide a reliable prediction for crude oil price time series?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Elżbieta M. Kacperska & Katarzyna Łukasiewicz & Marta Skrzypczyk & Joanna Stefańczyk, 2025. "Price Volatility in the European Wheat and Corn Market in the Black Sea Agreement Context," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Xu Gong & Mengjie Li & Keqin Guan & Chuanwang Sun, 2023. "Climate change attention and carbon futures return prediction," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(9), pages 1261-1288, September.
    7. Daxuan Cheng & Yin Liao & Zheyao Pan, 2023. "The geopolitical risk premium in the commodity futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 1069-1090, August.
    8. Massimo Guidolin & Manuela Pedio, 2021. "Forecasting commodity futures returns with stepwise regressions: Do commodity-specific factors help?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 1317-1356, April.
    9. Yang, Kun & Sun, Yuying & Hong, Yongmiao & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "Forecasting interval carbon price through a multi-scale interval-valued decomposition ensemble approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Zheng, Li & Sun, Yuying & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "A novel interval-based hybrid framework for crude oil price forecasting and trading," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Xiaowen Dai & Yi Chen & Chunyan Zhang & Yanqiu He & Jiajia Li, 2023. "Technological Revolution in the Field: Green Development of Chinese Agriculture Driven by Digital Information Technology (DIT)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Zhang, Yaojie & Ma, Feng & Wang, Yudong, 2019. "Forecasting crude oil prices with a large set of predictors: Can LASSO select powerful predictors?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 97-117.
    13. Wei, Yu & Liu, Jing & Lai, Xiaodong & Hu, Yang, 2017. "Which determinant is the most informative in forecasting crude oil market volatility: Fundamental, speculation, or uncertainty?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 141-150.
    14. Ma, Feng & Liao, Yin & Zhang, Yaojie & Cao, Yang, 2019. "Harnessing jump component for crude oil volatility forecasting in the presence of extreme shocks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-55.
    15. Ewa Szafraniec-Siluta & Agnieszka Strzelecka & Roman Ardan & Danuta Zawadzka, 2024. "Determinants of Financial Security of European Union Farms—A Factor Analysis Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Sun, Shaolong & Sun, Yuying & Wang, Shouyang & Wei, Yunjie, 2018. "Interval decomposition ensemble approach for crude oil price forecasting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 274-287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiafei & Liang, Chao & Chen, Zhonglu & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Forecasting crude oil volatility with uncertainty indicators: New evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Zhang, Yaojie & Wahab, M.I.M. & Wang, Yudong, 2023. "Forecasting crude oil market volatility using variable selection and common factor," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 486-502.
    3. Guo, Xiaozhu & Huang, Dengshi & Li, Xiafei & Liang, Chao, 2023. "Are categorical EPU indices predictable for carbon futures volatility? Evidence from the machine learning method," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 672-693.
    4. Chen, Zhonglu & Liang, Chao & Umar, Muhammad, 2021. "Is investor sentiment stronger than VIX and uncertainty indices in predicting energy volatility?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Huang, Yisu & Xu, Weiju & Huang, Dengshi & Zhao, Chenchen, 2023. "Chinese crude oil futures volatility and sustainability: An uncertainty indices perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Yan, Xiang & Bai, Jiancheng & Li, Xiafei & Chen, Zhonglu, 2022. "Can dimensional reduction technology make better use of the information of uncertainty indices when predicting volatility of Chinese crude oil futures?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Wang, Jiqian & He, Xiaofeng & Ma, Feng & Li, Pan, 2022. "Uncertainty and oil volatility: Evidence from shrinkage method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Liang, Chao & Tang, Linchun & Li, Yan & Wei, Yu, 2020. "Which sentiment index is more informative to forecast stock market volatility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Li, Tao & Ma, Feng & Zhang, Xuehua & Zhang, Yaojie, 2020. "Economic policy uncertainty and the Chinese stock market volatility: Novel evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-33.
    10. Wang, Jiqian & Ma, Feng & Bouri, Elie & Zhong, Juandan, 2022. "Volatility of clean energy and natural gas, uncertainty indices, and global economic conditions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Wen, Danyan & He, Mengxi & Wang, Yudong & Zhang, Yaojie, 2024. "Forecasting crude oil market volatility: A comprehensive look at uncertainty variables," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 1022-1041.
    12. Lu, Xinjie & Ma, Feng & Wang, Tianyang & Wen, Fenghua, 2023. "International stock market volatility: A data-rich environment based on oil shocks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 184-215.
    13. Chao Liang & Yin Liao & Feng Ma & Bo Zhu, 2022. "United States Oil Fund volatility prediction: the roles of leverage effect and jumps," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2239-2262, May.
    14. Chao Liang & Yan Li & Feng Ma & Yaojie Zhang, 2022. "Forecasting international equity market volatility: A new approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1433-1457, November.
    15. Luo, Qin & Ma, Feng & Wang, Jiqian & Wu, You, 2024. "Changing determinant driver and oil volatility forecasting: A comprehensive analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Zhao, Yuan & Gong, Xue & Zhang, Weiguo & Xu, Weijun, 2024. "Forecasting carbon futures returns using feature selection and Markov chain with sample distribution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Dinggao Liu & Liuqing Wang & Shuo Lin & Zhenpeng Tang, 2025. "A Novel Multi-Task Learning Framework for Interval-Valued Carbon Price Forecasting Using Online News and Search Engine Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Li, Xiafei & Liao, Yin & Lu, Xinjie & Ma, Feng, 2022. "An oil futures volatility forecast perspective on the selection of high-frequency jump tests," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Chen, Zhonglu & Ye, Yong & Li, Xiafei, 2022. "Forecasting China's crude oil futures volatility: New evidence from the MIDAS-RV model and COVID-19 pandemic," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Chao Liang & Yi Zhang & Yaojie Zhang, 2022. "Forecasting the volatility of the German stock market: New evidence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 1055-1070, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1127-:d:1662849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.