IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1730-d1230213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Distribution Heterogeneity and Influencing Factors of Different Leisure Agriculture Types in the City

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyu Wu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Jia Chen

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

Leisure agriculture is a crucial carrier for city agriculture and tourism growth. This study aims to explore the overall leisure agriculture and different types of leisure agriculture spatial sub-characteristics and their influencing factors. Taking the city of Xi’an, China, as an example, leisure agriculture was classified into four types: agritainments, agricultural parks, resorts, and rural homestays. According to this study, two ring zones and one core belt zone for leisure agriculture in Xi’an are dispersed unevenly and aggregated. Furthermore, geographic detectors and spatial principal components were employed as empirical techniques to investigate the primary factors influencing the spatial distribution of multiple leisure agriculture heterogeneity. The results about the influence mechanism indicate that the gross domestic product, population density, and accessibility to transportation dominated the overall spatial distribution, while the distance to scenic spots and water areas had a significant impact on the spatial distribution of some types. This research contributes to the reconstruction of leisure agriculture and promotes the sustainable development of agriculture and recreation by merging leisure agriculture spatial resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyu Wu & Jia Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Heterogeneity and Influencing Factors of Different Leisure Agriculture Types in the City," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1730-:d:1230213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Sandt, Anders & Low, Sarah A. & Thilmany, Dawn, 2018. "Exploring Regional Patterns of Agritourism in the U.S.: What's Driving Clusters of Enterprises?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 592-609, December.
    2. Nesrine Khazami & Zoltan Lakner, 2021. "Influence of Social Capital, Social Motivation and Functional Competencies of Entrepreneurs on Agritourism Business: Rural Lodges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Norberto Pelegrín Entenza & Antonio Vázquez Pérez & Analién Pelegrín Naranjo, 2022. "Rural Agrotourism Development Strategies in Less Favored Areas: The Case of Hacienda Guachinango de Trinidad," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Michał Roman & Piotr Grudzień, 2021. "The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Chenmei Liao & Yifan Zuo & Rob Law & Yingying Wang & Mu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation, Influencing Factors, and Development Paths of Rural Tourism Resources in Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Giulia Grillini & Giovanna Sacchi & Lisa Chase & Jacqui Taylor & Christelle C. Van Zyl & Peet Van Der Merwe & Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Fischer, 2022. "Qualitative Assessment of Agritourism Development Support Schemes in Italy, the USA and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Myriam Yolanda Sarabia-Molina & Jakson Renner Rodrigues Soares & Rubén Camilo Lois-González, 2022. "Innovations in Community-Based Tourism: Social Responsibility Actions in the Rural Tourism in the Province of Santa Elena–Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Carine Pachoud & Riccardo Da Re & Maurizio Ramanzin & Stefano Bovolenta & Damiano Gianelle & Enrico Sturaro, 2020. "Tourists and Local Stakeholders’ Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Summer Farms in the Eastern Italian Alps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Khairabadi, Omid & Sajadzadeh, Hassan & Mohammadianmansoor, Saheb, 2020. "Assessment and evaluation of tourism activities with emphasis on agritourism: The case of simin region in Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Sgroi, Filippo & Donia, Enrica & Mineo, Angelo Marcello, 2018. "Agritourism and local development: A methodology for assessing the role of public contributions in the creation of competitive advantage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 676-682.
    11. Binbin Li & Kai Du, 2023. "Analysis on the Development Mode of Leisure Agriculture Industrialization Based on General Equilibrium Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Vincenzo Giaccio & Luigi Mastronardi & Davide Marino & Agostino Giannelli & Alfonso Scardera, 2018. "Do Rural Policies Impact on Tourism Development in Italy? A Case Study of Agritourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Changhui Hu & Weidong Liu & Yuqiu Jia & Yaya Jin, 2019. "Characterization of Territorial Spatial Agglomeration Based on POI Data: A Case Study of Ningbo City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Yawen Lu & Binbin Li, 2021. "Research on Regional Differences of the Leisure Agriculture’s Impact on Farmers’ Income—An Empirical Analysis Based on Nonlinear Threshold Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Baoding Sun & Guixia Wang & Yunjia Liu, 2023. "Leisure Agriculture and Rural Tourism Benefit Analysis on Eco-Environmental Resource Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Chadley R. Hollas & Lisa Chase & David Conner & Lori Dickes & R. David Lamie & Claudia Schmidt & Doolarie Singh-Knights & Lindsay Quella, 2021. "Factors Related to Profitability of Agritourism in the United States: Results from a National Survey of Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Chen, Wenhui & Li, Sha & Chenqi, Xi, 2021. "Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Crop Loss Caused by Wildlife," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 36(1-2), pages 103-123, February.
    19. Devesa, María & Laguna, Marta & Palacios, Andrés, 2010. "The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 547-552.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Panagiotis Liargovas & Stavros Stavroyiannis & Ilias Makris & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Dimitrios Petropoulos & Eleni Anastasopoulou, 2020. "Sustaining Rural Areas, Rural Tourism Enterprises and EU Development Policies: A Multi-Layer Conceptualisation of the Obstacles in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Ahmad M. AboAlkhair & Sameh Fayyad & Alaa M. S. Azazz, 2023. "Post-COVID-19 Family Micro-Business Resources and Agritourism Performance: A Two-Mediated Moderated Quantitative-Based Model with a PLS-SEM Data Analysis Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:483-502 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Giulia Grillini & Giovanna Sacchi & Lisa Chase & Jacqui Taylor & Christelle C. Van Zyl & Peet Van Der Merwe & Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Fischer, 2022. "Qualitative Assessment of Agritourism Development Support Schemes in Italy, the USA and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Kenneth T. Benignos & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2022. "Viability of an Integrated Farm as an Agritourism Site in Toboso, Negros Occidental inthe New Normal," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 483-502, August.
    6. Mastronardi, Luigi & Cavallo, Aurora & Romagnoli, Luca, 2022. "How did Italian diversified farms tackle Covid-19 pandemic first wave challenges?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    7. Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco & Amedeo Boscolo & Dauro Mattia Zocchi, 2023. "Rural Culinary Tourism in Southern Europe: Emerging Educational Needs of a Growing Sector," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Maryam Mahmoodi & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Features and Challenges of Agritourism: Evidence from Iran and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Péter Szálteleki & Gabriella Bánhegyi & Zsuzsanna Bacsi, 2024. "The Impacts of CAP Subsidies on the Financial Risk and Resilience of Hungarian Farms, 2014–2021," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, February.
    10. Chen, Chun-Chu & Huang, Wei-Jue & Petrick, James F., 2016. "Holiday recovery experiences, tourism satisfaction and life satisfaction – Is there a relationship?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 140-147.
    11. Marta Teston & Daniel Villalba & Marco Berton & Maurizio Ramanzin & Enrico Sturaro, 2020. "Relationships between Organic Beef Production and Agro-Ecosystems in Mountain Areas: The Case of Catalan Pyrenees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    13. Pengfei Ban & Wei Zhan & Qifeng Yuan & Xiaojian Li, 2021. "Delineating the Urban Areas of a Cross-Boundary City with Open-Access Data: Guangzhou–Foshan, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei & Xihua Zhang, 2022. "Landscape and Unique Fascination: A Dual-Case Study on the Antecedents of Tourist Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Chiara Mazzocchi & Guido Sali, 2022. "Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 701-723, January.
    16. Bojan Đerčan & Dragica Gatarić & Milka Bubalo Živković & Marija Belij Radin & Danijela Vukoičić & Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Tamara Lukić & Petar Vasić & Milena Nikolić & Miloš Lutovac & Milena Lutova, 2023. "Evaluating Farm Tourism Development for Sustainability: A Case Study of Farms in the Peri-Urban Area of Novi Sad (Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Setiawan Priatmoko & Moaaz Kabil & Ali Akaak & Zoltán Lakner & Csaba Gyuricza & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Understanding the Complexity of Rural Tourism Business: Scholarly Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. María Redondo-Carretero & Carmen Camarero-Izquierdo & Ana Gutiérrez-Arranz & Javier Rodríguez-Pinto, 2017. "Language tourism destinations: a case study of motivations, perceived value and tourists’ expenditure," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 155-172, May.
    19. Shabbar Jaffry & Alexandros Apostolakis, 2011. "Evaluating individual preferences for the British Museum," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(1), pages 49-75, February.
    20. Torres-Sovero, Claudia & González, José A. & Martín-López, Berta & Kirkby, Christopher A., 2012. "Social–ecological factors influencing tourist satisfaction in three ecotourism lodges in the southeastern Peruvian Amazon," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 545-552.
    21. Christina Katsikari & Leonidas Hatzithomas & Thomas Fotiadis & Dimitrios Folinas, 2020. "Push and Pull Travel Motivation: Segmentation of the Greek Market for Social Media Marketing in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1730-:d:1230213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.