IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i6p484-d561003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hops ( Humulus lupulus L.) as a Novel Multipurpose Crop for the Mediterranean Region of Europe: Challenges and Opportunities of Their Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Rossini

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Virga

    (Research Consortium for the Development of Innovative Agro-Environmental Systems (Corissia), Via della Libertà 203, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Paolo Loreti

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Nicolò Iacuzzi

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 13, Building 4, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Roberto Ruggeri

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Maria Elena Provenzano

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

The common hop ( Humulus lupulus L.) is a dioecious perennial climbing plant, mainly known for the use of its female inflorescences (cones or, simply, “hops”) in the brewing industry. However, the very first interest towards hops was due to its medicinal properties. Actually, the variety of compounds present in almost all plant parts were (and still are) used to treat or prevent several ailments and metabolic disorders, from insomnia to menopausal symptoms as well as obesity and even cancer. Although hops are predominantly grown for hopping beer, the increasing interest in natural medicine is widening new interesting perspectives for this crop. Moreover, the recent success of the craft beer sector all over the world, made the cultivated hop come out from its traditional growing areas. Particularly, in Europe this resulted in a movement towards southern countries such as Italy, which added itself to the already existing hop industry in Portugal and Spain. In these relatively new environments, a complete knowledge and expertise of hop growing practices is lacking. Overall, while many studies were conducted globally on phytochemistry, bioactivity, and the genetics of hops, results from public research activity on basic hop agronomy are very few and discontinuous as well. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of possible uses, phenology, and agronomic aspects of hops, with specific reference to the difficulties and opportunities this crop is experiencing in the new growing areas, under both conventional and organic farming. The present review aims to fill a void still existing for this topic in the literature and to give directions for farmers that want to face the cultivation of such a challenging crop.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Rossini & Giuseppe Virga & Paolo Loreti & Nicolò Iacuzzi & Roberto Ruggeri & Maria Elena Provenzano, 2021. "Hops ( Humulus lupulus L.) as a Novel Multipurpose Crop for the Mediterranean Region of Europe: Challenges and Opportunities of Their Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:6:p:484-:d:561003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta & Concetta Nazzaro, 2020. "Measuring consumers’ preferences for craft beer attributes through Best-Worst Scaling," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette & Bergès, Fabian, 2016. "Consumers' Motivations Driving Organic Demand: Between Self-interest and Sustainability," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 522-538, December.
    3. Megan E. Waldrop & Jill J. McCluskey, 2019. "Does information about organic status affect consumer sensory liking and willingness to pay for beer?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 149-167, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    2. Áron Török & Ching-Hua Yeh & Davide Menozzi & Péter Balogh & Péter Czine, 2023. "Consumers' preferences for processed meat: a best–worst scaling approach in three European countries," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Chun-Wei Chen, 2023. "A Feasibility Discussion: Is ML Suitable for Predicting Sustainable Patterns in Consumer Product Preferences?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    4. András István Kun & Marietta Kiss, 2021. "On the Mechanics of the Organic Label Effect: How Does Organic Labeling Change Consumer Evaluation of Food Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. László Mucha, 2024. "Applying the theory of planned behavior to examine the customer behavior towards craft bakery products: evidence from Hungary," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Mili, Samir & Arfa, Imen, 2020. "Uncovering Value Creation Factors in Organic Food Supply Chains," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(05), December.
    7. Martin Mozny & Miroslav Trnka & Vojtech Vlach & Zdenek Zalud & Tomas Cejka & Lenka Hajkova & Vera Potopova & Mikhail A. Semenov & Daniela Semeradova & Ulf Büntgen, 2023. "Climate-induced decline in the quality and quantity of European hops calls for immediate adaptation measures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-6, December.
    8. Tuncay Turan TARABOĞLU & Tuğba Nur TOPALOĞLU & Serdar YAMAN, 2019. "The Effects of Macroeconomic Indicators on Leveraged Forex Volume: Evidence from Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 160-175, November.
    9. Veronica Marozzo & Alessandra Costa & Tindara Abbate, 2024. "The relationship between the perceived product sustainability of organic food and willingness to buy: a parallel mediation effect of product traceability and consumers’ environmental concerns," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(4), pages 375-393, December.
    10. Bosbach, Moritz & Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2019. "The Implicit Price for Fair Trade Coffee: Does Social Capital Matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 34-41.
    11. Sevtap ÜNAL & F. Görgün DEVECİ & Tuğba YILDIZ, 2019. "The main aim of this study is determining which consumption motives and personal and social factors affect organic food buying decisions. Ajzen’s Planned Behavior Theory (TPB) is used to explain consu," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(1), pages 1-35, May.
    12. Maria Cipollaro & Sara Fabbrizzi & Veronica Alampi Sottini & Bruno Fabbri & Silvio Menghini, 2021. "Linking Sustainability, Embeddedness and Marketing Strategies: A Study on the Craft Beer Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Marcello Stanco & Marco Lerro, 2020. "Consumers’ Preferences for and Perception of CSR Initiatives in the Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Anetta Barska, 2021. "Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Rangson Chirakranont & Sirijit Sunanta, 2021. "Applications of Experience Economy in Craft Beer Tourism: A Case Study in Thailand’s Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Neill, Clinton L. & Lahne, Jacob, 2022. "Matching reality: A basket and expenditure based choice experiment with sensory preferences," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    17. Tessitore, Sara & Iraldo, Fabio & Apicella, Andrea & Tarabella, Angela, 2020. "The Link between Food Traceability and Food Labels in the Perception of Young Consumers in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(05), December.
    18. Bonisoli, Lorenzo & Piedra-Muñoz, Laura & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio & Pérez Mesa, Juan Carlos, 2019. "Benchmarking agri-food sustainability certifications: evidences from applying SAFA in the Ecuadorian banana agri-system," MPRA Paper 119956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Katherine Fuller & Carola Grebitus & Troy G. Schmitz, 2022. "The effects of values and information on the willingness to pay for sustainability credence attributes for coffee," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 775-791, September.
    20. Rossi, Jairus & Vassalos, Michael & Schmidt, Claudia & Lamied, R. David & Wade, Anne, 2023. "Consumer Perceptions of Craft Breweries in the American South," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 54(03), November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:6:p:484-:d:561003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.