IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i2p116-d491262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Environmental Flows for the Yellow River Estuary by Trading Off Crop Yield and Ecological Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Aiping Pang

    (Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Department of Public Management, Nanjing Academy of Administration, Nanjing 210046, China)

  • Fen Zhao

    (Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Chunhui Li

    (Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yujun Yi

    (Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

To solve the water use conflicts between agriculture and ecosystems in arid and semiarid areas, a multi-objective trade-off analysis method was applied to determine the environmental flows (e-flows) for the Yellow River Estuary, by considering the temporal and spatial discrepancies in water allocation. The results showed that during average years, a loss of 3.7 × 10 8 yuan was caused with every 1 × 10 8 m 3 of e-flows under the baseline scenario. The crop growth stages of April–July are sensitive periods for water requirements, and over 5000 yuan/ha production losses were caused by prioritizing e-flows during this time in dry years. The stages from July–October require more water by ecosystems than other stages, and the recommended e-flows during this time accounted for 57% of the e-flows during the total year. Under scenarios 1–3, which represent the short-term, medium-term and long-term scenarios, more water resources were supplied by underground water and water diversion projects; however, alleviating the water use contradiction remained difficult in dry years. During average years, e-flows between 148 and 168 × 10 8 m 3 are recommended to meet the ecological objectives of survival, reproduction and biological integrity of species for the Yellow River Estuary. The recommended e-flows in wet years could meet higher ecological objectives but still barely achieve the targets of sediment transport and ecosystem dynamic balance. In dry years, the economic losses may be beyond the acceptance of irrigation stakeholders if more water is allocated to improve e-flows. In this case, 71 × 10 8 yuan would be paid to them to compensate for their losses. This study proposes an e-flow recommendation framework that is economically and ecologically optimal in areas with irreconcilable water-use contradictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiping Pang & Fen Zhao & Chunhui Li & Yujun Yi, 2021. "Rethinking Environmental Flows for the Yellow River Estuary by Trading Off Crop Yield and Ecological Benefits," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:116-:d:491262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, E. P. & Jackson, S. & Tharme, R. E. & Douglas, M. & Flotemersch, J. E. & Zwarteveen, M. & Lokgariwar, C. & Montoya, M. & Wali, A. & Tipa, G. T. & Jardine, T. D. & Olden, J. D. & Cheng, L. & , 2019. "Understanding rivers and their social relations: a critical step to advance environmental water management," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 6(6):1-21..
    2. Jonas Jägermeyr & Amandine Pastor & Hester Biemans & Dieter Gerten, 2017. "Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for Sustainable Development Goals implementation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, August.
    3. T. Sun & Z. Yang & B. Cui, 2008. "Critical Environmental Flows to Support Integrated Ecological Objectives for the Yellow River Estuary, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(8), pages 973-989, August.
    4. Daniel Crespo & Jose Albiac & Taher Kahil & Encarna Esteban & Safa Baccour, 2019. "Tradeoffs between Water Uses and Environmental Flows: A Hydroeconomic Analysis in the Ebro Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2301-2317, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, X.A. & Yang, Z.F., 2013. "A reservoir operating model for directing water supply to humans, wetlands, and cones of depression," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 114-120.
    2. Yang, Wei & Yang, Zhifeng & Qin, Yan, 2011. "An optimization approach for sustainable release of e-flows for lake restoration and preservation: Model development and a case study of Baiyangdian Lake, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2448-2455.
    3. Stephen J. Déry & Marco A. Hernández-Henríquez & Tricia A. Stadnyk & Tara J. Troy, 2021. "Vanishing weekly hydropeaking cycles in American and Canadian rivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Siyu Yue & Huaien Li & Fengmin Song, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Variations in the Economic Value Produced by Environmental Flows in a Water Shortage Area in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Zhang, Cheng-Yao & Oki, Taikan, 2023. "Water pricing reform for sustainable water resources management in China’s agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Buchs, Arnaud & Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2021. "Challenging the ecological economics of water: Social and political perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Florian Humpenöder & Alexander Popp & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Anton Orlov & Michael Gregory Windisch & Inga Menke & Julia Pongratz & Felix Havermann & Wim Thiery & Fei Luo & Patrick v. Jeetze & J, 2022. "Overcoming global inequality is critical for land-based mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Li, Zhibin & Feng, Bianbian & Wang, Wei & Yang, Xi & Wu, Pute & Zhuo, La, 2022. "Spatial and temporal sensitivity of water footprint assessment in crop production to modelling inputs and parameters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    9. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Yang, Wei, 2011. "A multi-objective optimization approach to allocate environmental flows to the artificially restored wetlands of China's Yellow River Delta," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 261-267.
    11. McCartney, Matthew P. & Whiting, L. & Makin, Ian & Lankford, B. A. & Ringler, C., 2019. "Rethinking irrigation modernisation: realising multiple objectives through the integration of fisheries," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 70(9):1201-.
    12. Michelle Scobie, 2020. "International aid, trade and investment and access and allocation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-254, June.
    13. Rosa, Lorenzo & Sanchez, Daniel L. & Realmonte, Giulia & Baldocchi, Dennis & D'Odorico, Paolo, 2021. "The water footprint of carbon capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Fernández, J.E. & Alcon, F. & Diaz-Espejo, A. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Cuevas, M.V., 2020. "Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Chen, Xiuzhi & Liu, Chang & van Oel, Pieter & Mergia Mekonnen, Mesfin & Thorp, Kelly R. & Yin, Tuo & Wang, Jinyan & Muhammad, Tahir & Li, Yunkai, 2022. "Water and carbon risks within hydropower development on national scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    16. Melissa Nogueira Sondermann & Rodrigo Proença Oliveira, 2021. "A Shared Vision on the Transboundary Water Management Challenges of the Tagus River Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(13), pages 4647-4664, October.
    17. Wei Yang & Zhifeng Yang, 2010. "An Interactive Fuzzy Satisfying Approach for Sustainable Water Management in the Yellow River Delta, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(7), pages 1273-1284, May.
    18. Lina Yousry & Yixin Cao & Bruno Marmiroli & Olivier Guerri & Guillaume Delaunay & Olivier Riquet & Karl Matthias Wantzen, 2022. "A Socio-Ecological Approach to Conserve and Manage Riverscapes in Designated Areas: Cases of the Loire River Valley and Dordogne Basin, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-38, December.
    19. Afsaneh Kaghazchi & Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany & Alireza Firoozfar, 2022. "Prioritization of agricultural water distribution operating systems based on the sustainable development indicators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 23-40, February.
    20. Doug J. Booker & Ton H. Snelder, 2023. "Climate change and local anthropogenic activities have altered river flow regimes across Canterbury, New Zealand," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2657-2674, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:116-:d:491262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.