IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i1p13-d305352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield Component Responses of the Brachiaria brizantha Forage Grass to Soil Water Availability in the Brazilian Cerrado

Author

Listed:
  • Camila Thaiana Rueda da Silva

    (Institute of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78735-901, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil)

  • Edna Maria Bonfim-Silva

    (Institute of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78735-901, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil)

  • Tonny José de Araújo da Silva

    (Institute of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78735-901, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil)

  • Everton Alves Rodrigues Pinheiro

    (Institute of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78735-901, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil)

  • Jefferson Vieira José

    (Multidisciplinary Center, Federal University of Acre, 69895-000, Cruzeiro do Sul, AC, Brazil)

  • André Pereira Freire Ferraz

    (Institute of Agricultural and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78735-901, Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil)

Abstract

Brazil is one of the world’s largest producers of beef cattle and dairy products, which requires high forage yield to attend grass-fed animals’ demand. Among the grass species adopted in the forage production system in Brazil, the Brachiaria genus stands out. This genus comprises nearly 85% of all planted forage area. In general, forage production systems in Brazil are essentially rainfed, and thus susceptible to seasonal soil water stresses. Selecting the suitable Brachiaria cultivar for lands susceptible to periodic waterlogging and dry spells is crucial to enhance forage yield, and consequently, to reduce the environmental footprint of the livestock sector. In this research, we investigated the performance of three recent commercial Brachiaria brizantha cultivars (Piatã, BRS Paiaguás, and MG13 Braúna) extensively adopted in Brazil’s grazing systems subjected to different ranges of soil water potential. For three cutting periods, yield related-variables (e.g., plant height, leaf area, dry biomass, and water use efficiency) were measured. Our results point to the existence of a low drought-resistant trait among cultivars, indicating the need for releasing better-adapted cultivars to cope with reduced soil water availability. All cultivars achieved higher performance at soil water pressure head between −15 kPa and −25 kPa; and in general, the cultivar. Piatã showed slightly superior results to most of the treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Camila Thaiana Rueda da Silva & Edna Maria Bonfim-Silva & Tonny José de Araújo da Silva & Everton Alves Rodrigues Pinheiro & Jefferson Vieira José & André Pereira Freire Ferraz, 2020. "Yield Component Responses of the Brachiaria brizantha Forage Grass to Soil Water Availability in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:13-:d:305352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/1/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molden, David & Oweis, Theib & Steduto, Pasquale & Bindraban, Prem & Hanjra, Munir A. & Kijne, Jacob, 2010. "Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 528-535, April.
    2. Pinheiro, Everton Alves Rodrigues & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & Inforsato, Leonardo & Šimůnek, Jirka, 2019. "Measuring full-range soil hydraulic properties for the prediction of crop water availability using gamma-ray attenuation and inverse modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 294-305.
    3. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niclene Ponce Rodrigues de Oliveira & Edna Maria Bonfim-Silva & Tonny José Araújo da Silva & Patrícia Ferreira da Silva & Rosana Andréia da Silva Rocha & Luana Aparecida Menegaz Meneghetti & Alisson S, 2023. "Effects of Fertilization Types and Base Saturation on the Growth and Water Productivity in Panicum maximum cv. BRS Zuri," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ntege, Ivan & Kiggundu, Nicholas & Wanyama, Joshua & Nakawuka, Prossie, 2023. "Napier yield response under different irrigation strategies in a tropical setting," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinheiro, Everton Alves Rodrigues & de Jong van Lier, Quirijn & Šimůnek, Jirka, 2019. "The role of soil hydraulic properties in crop water use efficiency: A process-based analysis for some Brazilian scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 364-377.
    2. Li, Xiaolin & Tong, Ling & Niu, Jun & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Spatio-temporal distribution of irrigation water productivity and its driving factors for cereal crops in Hexi Corridor, Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 55-63.
    3. Eric Njuki & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2019. "Examining irrigation productivity in U.S. agriculture using a single-factor approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-136, June.
    4. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Pereira, Luis S. & Bybordi, Mohammad, 2023. "Water management dilemma in the agricultural sector of Iran: A review focusing on water governance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Fernández, J.E. & Alcon, F. & Diaz-Espejo, A. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Cuevas, M.V., 2020. "Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Liu Liu & Zezhong Guo & Guanhua Huang & Ruotong Wang, 2019. "Water Productivity Evaluation under Multi-GCM Projections of Climate Change in Oases of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Descheemaeker, K. & Bunting, S. W. & Bindraban, P. & Muthuri, C. & Molden, D. & Beveridge, M. & van Brakel, Martin & Herrero, M. & Clement, Floriane & Boelee, Eline & Jarvis, D. I., 2013. "Increasing water productivity in Agriculture," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Zwart, Sander J. & Bastiaanssen, Wim G.M. & de Fraiture, Charlotte & Molden, David J., 2010. "A global benchmark map of water productivity for rainfed and irrigated wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1617-1627, October.
    9. Sebastian Kloss & Raji Pushpalatha & Kefasi Kamoyo & Niels Schütze, 2012. "Evaluation of Crop Models for Simulating and Optimizing Deficit Irrigation Systems in Arid and Semi-arid Countries Under Climate Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(4), pages 997-1014, March.
    10. Nyathi, M.K. & Mabhaudhi, T. & Van Halsema, G.E. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2019. "Benchmarking nutritional water productivity of twenty vegetables - A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 248-259.
    11. Jaafar, Hadi & Khraizat, Zein & Bashour, Isam & Haidar, Mustapha, 2017. "Determining water requirements of biblical hyssop using an ET-based drip irrigation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 107-117.
    12. Alvar-Beltrán, Jorge & Saturnin, Coulibaly & Grégoire, Baki & Camacho, Jose Luís & Dao, Abdalla & Migraine, Jean Baptiste & Marta, Anna Dalla, 2023. "Using AquaCrop as a decision-support tool for improved irrigation management in the Sahel region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    13. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "A comprehensive analysis of water productivity in natural vegetation and various crops coexistent agro-ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Stepanovic, Strahinja & Rudnick, Daran & Kruger, Greg, 2021. "Impact of maize hybrid selection on water productivity under deficit irrigation in semiarid western Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    16. Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan K. & Hilaire, Rolston St. & Begna, Sultan, 2016. "Effect of growth stage based irrigation on soil water extraction and water use efficiency of spring safflower cultivars," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 432-439.
    17. Andarzian, B. & Bannayan, M. & Steduto, P. & Mazraeh, H. & Barati, M.E. & Barati, M.A. & Rahnama, A., 2011. "Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 1-8.
    18. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2019. "Deep tillage and residue mulch effects on productivity and water and nitrogen economy of spring maize in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 724-731.
    19. Ehsan Qasemipour & Ali Abbasi & Farhad Tarahomi, 2020. "Water-Saving Scenarios Based on Input–Output Analysis and Virtual Water Concept: A Case in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Koffi Djaman & Suat Irmak & Komlan Koudahe & Samuel Allen, 2021. "Irrigation Management in Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:13-:d:305352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.