IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i3p61-d260053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rivals When We Work Together: Team Rivalry Effects on Performance in Collaborative Learning Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Cătălina Oțoiu

    (Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Lucia Rațiu

    (Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Claudia Lenuța Rus

    (Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Team rivalry has been mostly studied in competition settings, between competing individuals or teams, and has been linked to positive performance outcomes due to its impact on increasing motivation. However, rivalry is not limited to such contexts, it can also occur in collaborative settings, among team members working on a collaborative task. We argue that in such settings rivalry in teams has a negative impact on team performance, due to its negative impact on team learning behaviors. We employed a time-lagged, survey-based design with a sample of 176 students (55 teams) to investigate the relationship between rivalry and team performance through team learning behaviors. Our results based on simple mediation analyses show that, for our sample, rivalry in teams was not in fact negatively correlated to learning behaviors. Furthermore, we did not find support for the hypothesized positive relationship between learning behaviors and team performance, nor for the partial mediation model we proposed. We show how a series of team and task characteristics could explain our results and discuss potential future directions in the study of rivalry in collaborative settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Cătălina Oțoiu & Lucia Rațiu & Claudia Lenuța Rus, 2019. "Rivals When We Work Together: Team Rivalry Effects on Performance in Collaborative Learning Groups," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:61-:d:260053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yip, Jeremy A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E. & Nurmohamed, Samir, 2018. "Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 125-144.
    2. Erika A. Brown & James W. Grice, 2011. "One is Enough," SAGE Open, , vol. 1(3), pages 21582440114, October.
    3. Mateo M. Córcoles-Muñoz & Gloria Parra-Requena & María José Ruiz-Ortega & Pedro M. García-Villaverde & Francisco J. Ramírez-Fernández, 2019. "Psychological and Biographical Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention: Does the Learning Environment Act as a Mediator?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, April.
    4. West, Michael A. & Lyubovnikova, Joanne, 2012. "Real Teams or Pseudo Teams? The Changing Landscape Needs a Better Map," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 25-28, March.
    5. Malhotra, Deepak, 2010. "The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 139-146, March.
    6. Oana C. Fodor & Alina M. Fleștea & Iulian Onija & Petru L. Curșeu, 2018. "Networks Originate in Minds: An Exploration of Trust Self-Enhancement and Network Centrality in Multiparty Systems," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Chen, Gilad & Kanfer, Ruth & DeShon, Richard P. & Mathieu, John E. & Kozlowski, Steve W.J., 2009. "The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of cross-level model of motivation in teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 45-55, September.
    8. Marlow, Shannon L. & Lacerenza, Christina N. & Paoletti, Jensine & Burke, C. Shawn & Salas, Eduardo, 2018. "Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 145-170.
    9. Barry Z. Posner, 2012. "Effectively Measuring Student Leadership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Xue & Gongming Qian & Zhengming Qian & Lee Li, 2021. "Entrepreneurs’ Implicit and Explicit Achievement Motives and Their Early International Commitment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 91-121, March.
    2. Matteo Migheli, 2017. "The winner’s curse in auctions with losses," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 16(1), pages 113-126, November.
    3. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Adam, Marc T.P. & Krämer, Jan & Müller, Marius B., 2015. "Auction Fever! How Time Pressure and Social Competition Affect Bidders’ Arousal and Bids in Retail Auctions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 468-485.
    5. Ganga Sajeewani Karunathilaka, 2022. "Virtual Team Adaptation: Management Perspective on Individual Differences," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Steven Blader & Claudine Gartenberg & Andrea Prat, 2020. "The Contingent Effect of Management Practices," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(2), pages 721-749.
    7. Hsing-Yuan Liu & Su-Ching Sung & Chun-Yen Chao & Nai-Hung Chen & Hsiu-Fang Chen & Sheau-Ming Wu, 2022. "Development and Psychometric Testing of a Taiwanese Team Interactions and Team Creativity Instrument (TITC-T) for Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.
    8. Minson, Julia A. & VanEpps, Eric M. & Yip, Jeremy A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2018. "Eliciting the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: The effect of question phrasing on deception," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 76-93.
    9. Marie BLUM, 2021. "Auction hosts: are they really impartial?," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2021-09, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    10. Janice Francis Super & Teresa K. Betts & Heath Keller & Joy Roach Humphreys, 2020. "Simulation Game Outcomes: A Multilevel Examination of Knowledge Sharing Norms, Transactive Memory Systems, and Individual Learning Goal Orientations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(6), pages 830-858, December.
    11. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Arya, Vikas & Wang, Ying & Akhtar, Naeem & Mubarik, Shujaat & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Panic buying in the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country examination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Paul Pecorino, 2020. "Bridge burning and escape routes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 399-414, September.
    13. Einav Hart & Judith Avrahami & Yaakov Kareev, 2016. "Enlarging the market yet decreasing the profit: An experimental study of competitive behavior when investment affects the prize," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 380-390, July.
    14. Anca Metiu & Nancy P. Rothbard, 2013. "Task Bubbles, Artifacts, Shared Emotion, and Mutual Focus of Attention: A Comparative Study of the Microprocesses of Group Engagement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 455-475, April.
    15. Haji, Anouar El & Krawczyk, Michał & Sylwestrzak, Marta & Zawojska, Ewa, 2019. "Time pressure and risk taking in auctions: A field experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 68-79.
    16. Nahrgang, Jennifer D. & DeRue, D. Scott & Hollenbeck, John R. & Spitzmuller, Matthias & Jundt, Dustin K. & Ilgen, Daniel R., 2013. "Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 12-21.
    17. Santiago Sanchez-Pages & Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz & Enrique Turiegano, 2014. "Facial Masculinity: How the Choice of Measurement Method Enables to Detect Its Influence on Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Sandra Schruijer, 2020. "The Dynamics of Interorganizational Collaborative Relationships: Introduction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-9, August.
    19. Teng Iat Loi & Zhiyu Feng & Kristine M. Kuhn & Thomas M. Tripp, 2022. "When and How Underdog Expectations Promote Cheating Behavior: The Roles of Need Fulfillment and General Self-efficacy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 375-395, November.
    20. Nicola Lacetera & Bradley J. Larsen & Devin G. Pope & Justin R. Sydnor, 2016. "Bid Takers or Market Makers? The Effect of Auctioneers on Auction Outcome," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 195-229, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:61-:d:260053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.